Belfast Phase is an excuse to end Bosnia

It took a mere day and a half of one poorly staged performance at the NATO military base in Butmir near Sarajevo, to see right through the circus entirely. In this sorry-arse event (see preceding article), undeservedly dubbed by media the "Dayton Two", all of Bosnia's "leading politicians" took part. However, most of them are actually MI6 players (surrogate Muslim aristocrats) and known (as in: documented and publicized about) agents of the Serbian SDB-Intelligence!

It has become obvious after the play that all the actors, directors and screenplay writers had actually gathered in Butmir only to mimic the original Dayton gathering, while in actuality they drank, ate, and scared the hell out of the public exhausted in the past two decades, with statements such as "Bosnia will collapse unless we compromise". Actually, it is now obvious that the opposite applies! In order to prepare the terrain for the dissolution of one of the world's oldest nations, they and their western masonic mentors are softening the Bosnia's patriots, first by increasing bloody incidents around the country (see preceding article), and as of today also by throwing in baits such as alleged proposals to create "common national government" and "single office of the President", offering "NATO membership", "EU candidacy status", "visas lifting" and, as a cream to top it off, they offer to abolish the "ethnic parliamentary vote" (but only in one of two Houses, so the proposal is meaningless!).

Of course, none of that really matters, and is/are mere food for spectators who have opened their jaws, ready to swallow the idiocy of all idiocies. What really and only matters in Bosnia, today as ever, is a historical fact that's being minted in a cold blood as we speak: genocide shall be recognized as a valid means for resolving world issues. Consequences of this are obvious too: the UN shall make an entry into its free-fall orbit, only to make a hard landing on the same dumpster where the League of Nations had been buried earlier by their common mom England. And the Munich Accord that brought about World War II shall be studied by scholars of tomorrow as the "forerunner of the Dayton Accord that brought about World War III". Kids of XXIII century (under reign of Elisabeth III) shall be polishing their school projects titled "Why we didn't learn from mistakes that led to the WWII, to help us prevent WWIII"...

Alas, too late, as the masonic world shall at that same time be making preparations for WWIV, while making sure that those same kids become fresh corpses of tomorrow.

Dayton Two means Belfast Phase for Bosnia

After sentencing Ms. Hartmann (she was fined a few Euros, but, more importantly, also found guilty of -- justice!?), warmongers led by Carl Bildt (an obedient freemason who couldn't graduate from college) and Miroslav Lajčak have arrived in Sarajevo on 08 October, 2009. They are trying to carve up Bosnia, and finish their two-decade long effort of underground intelligence ops aimed at pushing the Drina geostrategic separator farther towards Rome.

As an overture to the planned grand finale (along with a crescendo), the writers of this libretto of death started setting a series of bloody incidents all over Bosnia, aimed at destabilizing the country. A 24-years old soccer fan of FC Sarajevo, Vedran Puljic was murdered execution-style two days ago by known intelligence operatives who had mixed with the police in what was supposed to be a controlled gathering of fan groups of two opposing soccer clubs before their game in Siroki Brijeg, FC Sarajevo (guests) and FC Siroki (hosts from the predominantly Catholic part of Southern Bosnia). Things didn't go that well for the intelligence operatives, as they actually assassinated a wrong guy -- while aiming and shooting (videos are posted all over the net) at the crowd which they assumed was composed exclusively of Muslims. But the executed young man was actually a Croat who supported FC Sarajevo! Thus the Bosnia's multicultural millennium is saving her once again.

With the situation amiss, the intelligence underground community composed of Serbian SDB operatives and collaborators from all ethnic groups, led by MI6, has naturally began expanding their theater of ops. So now Catholic churches in Sarajevo are being attacked, and insulting messages painted all over them. The theater was previously softened by an increase in ethnic incidents in the last month or so, where, for example, Croatian flags were set on fire by groups of Sarajevan soccer fans controlled by the SDA party (meaning: Serbian SDB). This all means that, in order to accomplish their geostrategic goal as mentioned above, the op analysts led by the aforementioned freemasons are doing their best to plant the seed of hatred once again amongst Bosnian Muslims and Catholics. There could hardly be a more unnatural conflict on the face of the Earth, than an animosity amongst these two groups because they are the one (Illyrian) people divided by misfortune of historic occupations (by Ottomans; by Habsburgs), always in the interest of English royals and their obsession with how to destabilize the Holy See. This time around, as initiated already a few decades ago, they are aiming to carve up Bosnia into three even funnier (and, obviously, less stable) puppet statelets than is the case presently with the Brussels Phase (Dayton Phase minus Bonn Authorities for enforcing the Dayton Agreement).

In other words, after they had officially recognized the genocidal puppet-creature called "Republika Srpska" as their equal partner (simply by virtue of moving on to the so-called Dayton Two phase, instead of reverting the situation to what was before the Bosnian Genocide established by the International Court of Justice), we are now being pushed by London away from the Dayton Phase, across the Brussels Phase, and on to the "Belfast Phase" for Bosnia. And the English know bloody well how to fire up an Ireland, don't they.

Sign Petition for Florence Hartmann

A true heroine of our age, Florence Hartmann deserves your attention and support. This brave lady has stood up against geostrategic powers. She simply acted in compliance with her consciousness, and out of her heart, which happened to be against imperialistic supremacy as well. Learn first-hand why we all still live in the darkness of the 19th century, regardless the glamour and colors of false hopes such as the UN. The strings are being pulled by English royals and their masonic puppeteers. Learn also what sorts of human scum wears judges' robes these days, judges who may be no better than those who once blindly served one chancellor of Germany and his "laws".

Learn and remember this: since vast majority of people are innately good at heart, every dictatorship needs appearance of legality, and therefore writes up own sets of laws and "laws" alike. It's up to us on the receiving end of their arrogant mercy, to distinguish the true from false "laws". The false ones are scarce but far more dangerous for a society than anything you could ever imagine... This petition is about your uprising against one and all of the "laws" of our World. More specifically yet, it's about liberating a potential political prisoner from the reach of a western albeit obviously antidemocratic "law".

Don't just wait for history to happen so you can "read all about it". Instead, write it yourself: sign the petition to save Florence Hartmann from an absolutely insane prosecution:

http://www.caseflorencehartmann.org/

Being evil is a family business

As mentioned earlier, the Britain's Geostrategy of Controlled Chaos is a family business ran by a few families most notably the Salisbury's. Their confidants in the field, who see that the geostrategy is implemented on the decade-to-century scales, are also families; obviously this is the only way for the thing to go wholly unnoticed by the unsuspecting public. In Bosnia, these are the Sephardic families that were migrated from Spain to Bosnia in 1492, a few decades after the Ottomans annihilated the Bosnian Kingdom by leveling to the ground all of its 500 castles and towns, while leaving intact only the gravestones (so-called "stećci") to scare the visitor away from the No-man's-land. The Ottomans were paid for by London, who put them in throne in 1453 and had them immediately rush to Bosnia, thus conquering her in 1463. No other nation's statehood was annihilated by the Ottomans on their route to Bosnia and beyond, such as Macedonia, Serbia, Monte Negro, Hungary... Obviously, the goal of their campaign was to annihilate Bosnia. The immediate and long-term goals of this were to create permanent instability in the Pope's immediate vicinity, by inducing Bosnia's majority into all sorts of beliefs and systems, just not Catholicism -- England's deadliest enemy of all. Thus Bosnia was served all sorts of diverging baits, such as Bulgarian bogomilianism, Turkish Islam, Russian/Serb orthodoxy, then atheism, and now Bosnian majority (Illyrians-Muslims) are being Serbicized as we speak.

Immediately preceding the occupation and obliteration of Kingdom of Bosnia, were two massacres of practically entire Bosnian nobility, first one in Križevci in 1397 and then in Dobor in 1408. The Pope was tricked into giving his blessings to the Hungarian king who committed the massacre, by a faked "coronation" of the Bosnian king for the King of Serbia in 1377 (thus the Pope was made to believe that Bosnia was going to become an Orthodox province). Hungarian king belonged to the Order of the Knights of Dragon, an English geostrategist shield gathering duke of Norfolk de Mowbray, Austrian archduke Ernst, Serbian despot Stefan, Polish king Ladislav, Danish king Christopher etc., a shield that nowadays exists via different forms of "Freemasonry". The real (geostrategic) reason for the massacres however was to soften Bosnia militarily, as practically all generals of the brave Bosnian army and navy were noblemen. Even after such measures, Bosnia didn't give in so easily to the Ottomans, mostly thanks to its rugged terrain and brave people, which prevented any other occupation in prior times (even the mighty Roman Empire took four long years to conquer Bosnia/Illyria proper, in what Roman historians regard as the toughest war that Roman Empire had ever undertaken, on par with the Punic wars).

So soon after the Ottoman annihilation of the country, educated Sephardic families replaced the slain Bosnian aristocracy, took Islam, and were now given the nobility posts and titles, such as Beys and Agas. They have been holding most important posts in Bosnia ever since, making sure that the British geostrategy is being always implemented. This of course is done at the extremely high cost: Bosnia always seems "strange", "unlikely", etc., a nation, with always the most ridiculous political solutions being implemented for Bosnia, while international conferences and foreign occupations shape her destiny geopolitically. These families run government (behind the scenes), but also quite openly run state hospitals, courts, national companies, etc. It's worth noting that, no matter the type of the regime, most of the time members of the same families run the show. Thus the same families, who gave ruling class and intellectuals under the Ottoman occupation, simply continued doing so under the Austrian occupation, as well as under the Serbia's monarchy, as well as in the Communism, as well as today in what mimics Capitalism. At the same time, it's quite obvious to every Bosnian Muslim today that not only our aristocracy wannabes are the least faithful believers of all, but they also care about the national interests the least. Sounds familiar? Of course, the like surrogate-aristocracy is being positioned strategically around the globe, such as, say, the Saudi family. Same goes for the Ottoman family as well; they too were seated using London's gold. Just as they have been seating useful families around the world, the English have been also dethroning families loyal to the Pope. For this they use London's "freemasonry" dogs (a bunch of money grabbing morons) who stage revolutions, invent idiotic regimes such as communism, or play "sudden-billionaire-turned-democrat" roles.

Thus the matter of allowing for some 10000 of his citizens to be massacred in a well planned and organized genocide in Srebrenica, while stopping his own army to rush and rescue them, was easy to one traitor and a Sephard by blood Alija Izetbegović (the suffix "begović" means he's rightfully a "Bey"). Other examples include the Bey Families of Tihić's, Lagumdžija's, Gavrankapetanović's, Filipović's, etc. No matter what, the same families always give the nation's most prominent dignitaries and leaders, managers, judges, media influentials, etc., for full five centuries now. That's how the mechanism of the Britain's geostrategy is being so successfully implemented: by imitating that of the Monarchy herself. It's all a family business, bloodiest one at that... Obviously, the only way to secure stability for Bosnia is to allow her to return to her roots. Ethnically, this means acknowledging that the so-called "Slavic origin" of the Western Balkan's peoples was a fallacy created by England through grants to Vuk Karadžić (proven nowadays by the DNA studies that find the majority of that population to be of Illyrian descent, with virtually no one being of Slavic descent). Politically, this return to the roots means implementing the Spanish solution, and reinstating the last rightful dynasty in Bosnia.

Zeitgeist III nails it

Zeitgeist movement is right on the spot this time, I hear. Third time's the charm, so Zeitgeist III (the Movie), has it all, and truly debunked: from geopolitics, the "good v. evil" and economic shortage trickeries, to crime true causes and the ever-going money hypnosis... Wholeheartedly recommended, not only for debunking the bastards behind the scenes, but even more so for proposing a fully workable alternative! Hopefully we won't hear more of the same old: "it's the best system possible" (in reference to what's going on already, including perpetual economic crises and world wars). See for yourself what the world is all about. Don't forget: the key evidence for all this is easily found in history of geopolitical hotspots such as Bosnia!

Zeitgeist reality check

So we have a world's savior, called the Zeitgeist movement, I hear. No doubt: with the advent of the Internet over the last decade people are becoming convinced that conspiracies are not just theories, but the way human society on Earth is organized. Yet, they seem to be going into another extreme -- while they were underinformed before, they are overinformed now. The result is the same: confusion. (Though, one must congratulate Zeitgeist films creators for not falling in the trap of immediately dismissing anecdotal evidence, or of instead trusting only the idiotic "100% material evidence" trickery, as in the London's so-called "Anglo-Saxon Law system").

The way we live has been predetermined not by some esoteric concepts such as "a grand-scale, never-ending fight between Good and Evil", or by the will of some handful of bankers' families to rule the world (banks don't have armies!). It's far simpler than that. Our world has been shaped by the will of those who have geostrategic potential to rule the world and are using it to that effect precisely! There are only two ways this can go: either by occupying one's mind/soul (via a set of beliefs), or by capturing one's body (militarily or/and via credits). The two absolute geostrategic powers in these two domains are: the Pope and the English Royal family, respectively. While Vatican uses the Good (bless them for that), London misuses the Evil. The most important tool for achieving their goals are their own priests. As we know it through the mouth of its US creator, the "Freemasonry" means merely London's pastors created to follow and pray to Lucifer instead of Jesus... But not in order to "provide a save haven for all who seek protection from the Church prosecution both physical and mental" as masonry likes to say. No! It's a matter of fact, where Bosnia is the key to the ultimate truth, that the reason why the US was created two centuries ago is to serve as a never-ending supply of cannon meat for achieving London's geostrategy that tries to imitate that of the Roman Empire. For instance, this is the strategic reason why Americans are kept undereducated so that their society depends on foreign intellect (60% of US university professors are foreign-born)...

The ultimate geostrategic goal of England is to destroy the (idea of) Pope, which can be done only in his domain. In order to do just that, they will have to destroy Christianity itself. They are doing a great job indeed: from the dragging of the Serb-Slavic hordes from Mt. Ural 1500 years ago to force their way (of like brutality) towards Rome, via the "witchery/sorcery" of the Mid Ages that was successfully crushed by the Church, the splitting of the Church into thousands of denominations, the Italian and later on World (but mostly European) wars including the creation of USA and LN/UN, or Communism and Fascism for which they inverted no less than the Catholic symbolism (of 5-pointed star; of Swastika) so to make it appear the Pope was behind both... The devil truly does come with a thousand faces.

The only way to save the world from the unavoidable destruction of the upcoming (this time surely nuclear) "Reichstag fire - Pearl Harbor - 9/11" intro to (even deadlier) WWIII, is to make the change within the US herself, as well as at the very top of Russia's and China's ruling class so that the "Freemasonry"-type of stupidity is forever eradicated from the face of the Earth. It is on that change, and on sincerity and agility of President Obama and his team that his own physical future depends, as does the future of the United States, and as does the future of our entire World.

EU misled to believe in China

So EU is looking at China (Asia) for help in reforming the world financial system, I hear. EU has started with this wannabe-geostrategy of hers pretty slowly and shy, by first creeping into Beijing some seven years ago and trying ever since to build a geostrategic alliance with China. Well, guess who was there first (by a couple of centuries)? England, of course -- surprise!

The earliest interest by the English (lords) in China started almost a thousand years ago. It culminated in English Navy defeating the Chinese and capturing Hong Kong little over a century ago, to make it a safe haven for the Family Royalle's drug smuggling business (opium; hashish). The "business" turned them into the richest dynasty on Earth, and so encouraged, they later expanded on cocaine markets of Columbia, nowadays safeguarded by MI6 and (parts of) CIA. So China has been a geostrategic puppet of London's ever since. Along the way, Chinese also got their "revolution" just like Germans, French, Italians etc. got their own faked "revolutions" too.

Whenever you find yourself completely overwhelmed by a situation the origins of which you cannot even begin to explain, chances are that you are looking at a grand conspiracy. Such was the case with "fall of Communism" in Russia, where out of 110 armies totaling 5 million soldiers (2nd largest on Earth), not a single hard-line communist general marched on Moscow to capture Parliament or TV, so (not just any but the then-deadliest enemy) Capitalism replaced Communism. Give me a break! Such was the "Communism turned Capitalism" in China too...

Namely, what's been going on in China for the past decade or so is not fundamentally different from what London had contemplated in fmr. Yugoslavia -- a social lab for inventing all sorts of idiotic concepts ranging from genocides to worker-self-governance and back to genocides... Just like the Russian/French/German etc. "revolution" leaders were actually fakes installed by London, so were the Chinese fakes too. The same method is used everywhere: a frustrated individual who would give anything to gain power is opened a huge gold-credit line by London to fulfill his dreams after his masonic predecessor "coincidentally overthrows" the preceding regime. In return, the credit monkey appoints a third individual, carefully picked by London for his heavily disturbed psychology, as the successor of the rabbit-forerunner. Then follow "world" wars, Gulags etc. More is to come, as Putin appointed Medvedev after mason Yeltsin "overthrew" communism, just like Lenin appointed Stalin after masons Kerensky/Lvov "overthrew" monarchy, Hindenburg appointed Hitler after mason Ebert "overthrew" monarchy, Kai-Shek appointed Zedong after mason Yat-sen "overthrew" monarchy, Stambolić appointed Milošević after mason Tito "overthrew" monarchy, and so on... The method is seen so many times, yet it never failed!

So the Chinese excitement with their "sudden" prosperity, followed by national awakening, the Olympics (who said Sarajevo 1984) and even own "Space program", are all sure signs of an upcoming calamity to be brought upon the Chinese by their very leaders -- loyal to London only. What a retarded move on part of the EU leaders (most of whom belong to "Freemasonry" and similar Londoner freaks), to actually declare high hopes in such China!? 'Speak geostrategicsish, anyone?

Missiles, not airplanes hit the Towers on 9/11

YouTube has problem with this video, I hear. They do not allow it on their servers! No, it is not pornography of any type... It is the most staggering piece of evidence yet that the 9/11 was just a (CGI-computer animated graphics) fairytale. What really hit the Towers were air-to-land missiles, the image and trajectory trace of which were digitally re-mastered to look like airliners in the footage broadcast by five national news corporations simultaneously (with an obvious 17-seconds delay). The broadcast was actually controlled from a single (command) center, while military communication was intercepted by early news reports on that morning... No digital equipment was operational on that morning in the Manhattan area (military electronic spoofing) so no amateur digital images exist, while NYPD officers spent that whole day confiscating rolls of film that people turned in to local photographer stores for developing, under the excuse of "protecting memories of families of the victims". Yeah, right: too carrying a police force, a little too soon... Literally all of the so-called amateur video-footage of the "planes" smashing (cartoon-like slicing) into the buildings was "taped" by actual professionals in CGI -- the list of names and their professions is staggering! No eyewitness has ever reported of an airplane, while instead many (suppressed in media reports) did report of missiles, including a news veteran with war experience from Iraq and Afghanistan. The only dozen-or-so "eyewitnesses" who claimed they saw airplanes hitting the buildings were (wow!) top executives of those five national news corporations! That list of names and professions is as staggering... But if you thought this was not enough to prove the mother of all conspiracies: people from the allegedly hijacked airplanes never meant to take those flights (at least one of which never existed as a regular flight), nor has anyone showed up at the destination (LA) airport that day to expectedly ask about their love ones -- no relatives, no friends, no one... Indeed, as we now know with certainty, a missile struck the Pentagon on that day, so the whole operation including NY and PA logically was accomplished in the same manner -- using missiles... What a documentary! What a shameful place Anglo-Saxonia is! And what a dumbass gang the "Freemason" pyramidiots are!

Leading US student paper goes fascist?

At the beginning of this month, a young man named Caleb Posner published an article in a leading US student newspaper (Newspaper of Washington University), titled "Bosnia's predictable demise". The article caused concern in the cyber world, but not only there as it is full of plain fascist views on how an ancient nation ought to be "dismantled". Below (on top of preceding posts in blue) I reproduce my comment that this newspaper censored on their Web Site. As you will see, there is nothing whatsoever in my post that warrants it being censored, except for a series of facts and opinions, just like the author's... [Addendum, 30 Nov 2008: the below post was approved only today on the newspaper's Web site, five days since initial posting and two days after this "protest" appeared on this blog of mine. Previous posts to that paper's blog were posted in a matter of hours.]
------------------

Mensur Omerbashich (several attempts to leave the following comment have failed) Never heard of "disappearing peoples", especially those allegedly gone in a mere few centuries? Were they adopted by an alien civilization? Seriously now: more likely, the sources (Roman, Hellenic, later Serbian, Croatian...) started calling Bosnians their own. It's called geopolitics. Happens often, all around the globe, e.g. today in the Middle East where freedom fighters are commonly regarded as terrorists. You catch my drift… Which brings me to an earlier comment by this propaganda’s author: Serbs and Croats became as such around the Renaissance, with other nationalist movements of Europe. So, no Serbs or Croats existed as such in "5th century". Just us, Illyrians, later regarded as Bosnians (after a centrally positioned Illyrian tribe and river) – the people of Kingdom of Bosnia put in place along with many other kingdoms to safeguard the Pope in the collapsed-Rome aftermath, when Slav hordes began unstoppably advancing towards Rome…

Reminder: around 17th/18th century, immediately after England got nearly nailed by powerful Spaniard fleet under the Pope, masonic creeps (London's puppets) spread across Europe to instate capitalism instead of monarchies. England wanted to preemptively get rid of “Papal armies” after her “Deadliest War”, so by manipulating human weaknesses (as today!) England and her Freemoronic Trojan Horse put in power a number of money-grabbing morons called capitalists, across Europe… (By the way, they still run most of Europe.)

The Pope’s noble intention of 17th century was to civilize the Anglo-Saxons, something even Romans never managed to do. Slavs were the only other significant European tribe that Romans never civilized either. These two failures by the Romans/Pope are the cause for all major troubles that Europe has gone through since 17th century at least. Even as we speak, the EU has been sabotaged by London (finances/monetary) and its credit-puppet Moscow (energy)… At the same time they pretend (recall the joke called "Fall of Communism"?) to be grave rivals over Bosnia and thereby afraid of each other, thus justifying the Bosnia’s gridlock, when in fact London supported Serbia in early 1990-ies when Russia was on her knees. So keeping the Pope in his Golden Cage (a.k.a. Vatican) that Italian masonic traitors have placed him in one century ago, is of utmost importance to London. We all know how to make a golden cage golden. It’s the part ‘how you make it a cage' that’s relevant here.

--

Mrtav Hladan Fri Nov 14 2008 04:21 Illyrians don't make me laugh they disappeared and then 3-4 hundred years later Albanians are mentioned.Now all of the Balkans is Illyran.Seems that The Austro-Hugaran propaganda is still in effect.Bosnia is a EU colony and will eventually split between Srbija nad Hrvatska.And the Muslims will get what we leave them.

--

Mensur Omerbashich Thu Nov 13 2008 13:32 To Alexandar: around 2/3 of all Bosnians are Illyrian, according to independent (Western) DNA studies in the last decade or so. Most Croatians, Montenegrens and Albanians are also Illyrian. It also turns out that most Serbians are not even Slav... The Bosnians=Illyrians equation coincides well with ancient maps depicting Greco-Roman period, showing Illyria centered on Bosnia and naming the today's Adriatic Sea (Emperor Hadrian's Sea) as Mare Illyricum - the Illyrian Sea. Professor John Wilkes, a world leading authority on Illyrians, also supports this equation. So, you were saying?

--

Aleksandar Thu Nov 13 2008 11:00 In ten, twenty, or hundred years, sooner or later Bosnia will separate into three pieces and the Croatian and Serbian thirds will unite with Croatia and Serbia respectively. All south slavs (except the Slovenes) are eitehr Serbs or Croats. These are the only two slavic tribes mentioned in in the Balkans since antiquity. Montengrins, Bosnijaks, Macedonians, what were their ancestors called before they moved to the Balkans?

Croatia's bridge on Britain's orders

Construction is Freemasonry's favorite cover-up (another one is visiting local hospitals and posing as a group Santa). To that effect, they even stole the famous Egyptian pyramids story, and are selling it as their own brand. (As I mentioned earlier, they were created only in 17th century, on English Crown's orders, to pose as a Trojan horse in continental Europe, which then extended around the Globe.) In imposing its naughty little game, the British government doesn't care much about what it is that its Horse preaches, or how many histories it makes up (such as: imprinting pyramid images on bank notes, inventing faked hopes like US, UN, etc.). All they want is to impress us, by creating as much and as shiny as possible, in any area imaginable from economy to art to engineering to science, no matter the cost and no matter the value... Most importantly, they use their "obsession" with construction so as to advance their philosophy as that "of those who spread the light", as if students must be lied to about questions we cannot answer, as if buildings must be oversized and stretch ever extendedly and overshadow anything humans make and outshine everything within the surroundings including the nature herself. Because you see, Freemasonry believes that it is them, the chosen few, who are the light, who are the nature, who are the god... And the rest of us? Well, every pyramids story requires slaves, remember? Now you may ask -- why am I telling you all this on a blog about Bosnia?
.

A 1919 secret document by the Foreign Office proves UK is aware for a long time of the highest value a Bosnian harbor would have. Britain is trying to prevent Bosnia's access to the International waters, and for this she hired services of her puppet -- the Croatia's government ran by HDZ.

See, the fake pyramids near Visoko aren't the only symbolism that Masonic creeps are trying to impose on Bosnia in order to demonstrate to Vatican that Bosnia will never exit the seventh circle of hell that London had pushed her into, some 1600 years ago, so as to keep the continental Europe permanently unstable and thus Vatican permanently miserable (of course, people tend to grow in numbers, so larger catastrophes are cooked up from time to time, such as fake -- nonetheless bloody -- World Wars, or, before those, Italian Wars, and so on). Thus, as their faked (Visoko) pyramids mass-hysteria as a diversion to the passing of faked Amendments to the faked Bosnia's faked Constitution have all failed in the B&H Parliament (in sweet April of 2006 -- the anniversary of the Bosnia's Grand Masonic Lodge resurrection), new construction was needed, new illusions were to be called for, and new morons were to be drafted into the ranks of fake light. Hence there came about the Pelješac Bridge story...

Now, that's not an ordinary bridge, mind you, for it's supposed to connect Croatia's coastline with Croatia's Pelješac peninsula. The official explanation is that, by building this bridge, Croatia connects Dubrovnik and Croatia's inlands via road, thus entirely abandoning the existing (single-)ferryboat line land-Pelješac. (The Bosnian coastline interrupts that of Croatia!) But there's something really odd about that: to build a bridge is the most expensive solution that the government of an overextended (credit-wise) Croatia has at its disposal! Other, far cheaper solutions include digging an undersea tunnel, or even cheaper yet -- purchasing more ferryboats... But No -- says Croatia's governments, not coincidentally ran by HDZ party -- an MI6 creation (the HDZ infamous counterpart is Bosnia's ruling SDA party -- both created by MI6 to serve England's geostrategic needs). Believe it or not: they're going to build this economic disaster of a bridge -- despite clear and loud opposition from the Bosnian Presidency, and clear and obvious maps by fmr. Yugoslavia Military Cartographic Institute showing the marine delineation [see image above]! And it won't be just any bridge, oh no. It will be built so as to impress, so as to overstretch, so as to overshadow and so as to outshine everything ever seen on both sides of the Adriatic Sea! Not less importantly, in doing so they are going to usurp not less that 1 km of Bosnia's territorial seawaters [see image above]. And that's where our story begins...

.

And where it ends, too. Namely, as it can be seen from the first, third and fourth image [Bosnia's territorial border shown pink; Top image: Croatia's territorial claim shown red if Bosnian islands of Great Školj and Little Školj (not shown) were to belong to Croatia], this "unexplainable" bridge is going to expel Bosnia from the marine nations club -- by simply crossing Bosnia's territorial waters for about 1 km. It is a well-established practice by the International Court to accept the right of exploitation, and all Croatia has to do in order to grab this little tiny piece of Adriatic Seacoast (to add to 98% it already claims -- without Yugoslavia succession delineation ever carried out!) is to build something... anything, really. The Pelješac bridge thus means: no access for Bosnia to the International waters, and no future for Bosnia's envisioned Neum-Klek harbor, so no bright days for a brave Illyrian nation that have been suffering for the past 2 millennia like no one else has ever suffered on this planet we call Earth. So as a new Constitution is being drafted (as we speak), a new diversion stage has been set up. Bring it on, maestro! When you think about it, all of this just so to provide peaceful dreams for one average nation we call England... Indeed, someplace, someday, may those dreams turn into a nightmare!

To my Albanian compatriot

(A reply to my Illyrian-Albanian compatriot, from the "pyramids" blog)


Dear "anonymous",

Thanks for your sincere thoughts. I agree with what you say. It's very sad that Bosnian, Albanian, Montenegrin, and Croatian intellectuals are so submissive to Serbian nationalism.

But in my opinion, geostrategically speaking, Serbs are a victim too: of the England-Russia holy alliance. One century ago, these two powers made a deal to keep continental Europe in state of cyclic misery. Major results of this were the use of English bankers' gold to install communism in Russia (and then using the same gold for communism's comical “fall”), then the two World Wars including the two Yugoslavias, and so forth. As long as the Serbs play along, and attack peaceful Illyria at their command, England and Russia encourage Serb nationalism (England and Russia pretend to be rivals and “afraid” of each other, but England supported Serbia in 1990-ies when Russia was on her knees, so their current “struggle” regarding Kosovo-Bosnia is faked). But as soon as the Serbs arise to become a regional power, those very “allies” of theirs knock them down (the latest example being NATO bombardment of Serbia). Germany must play a similar role to that of Serbia's, except on a larger scale.

England keeps on sabotaging the EU on monetary and agriculture issues, just as Russia does with her constant energy blackmails towards the EU. Finances, food and energy are the three pillars of geostrategy. In other words, they are prerequisites for a strong geopolitical entity to exist at all. The lack of those three pillars is the reason why the EU is so weak geopolitically. There are other mechanisms for England to achieve this, such as via Austria and Turkey – England’s major geostrategic partners of a thousand years (for instance, it was England that had brought the Ottomans in to the Balkans, in 1463, and then England brought Austria too, in 1878). But a major leverage the English are using to accomplish their racist geopolitics is their creation of Freemasonry they use as a Trojan horse to manipulate the unsuspecting (peaceful) peoples around the globe, via control of target-nations’ lead politicians and media. Other creations by the English include the UN and the USA. Just what the Swiss are in cheese-making, the French in wine-making, and the German in machinery-making, the English are in war-making. Their global dominance has become their major purpose of living.

Unfortunately, Illyria proper (Dalmatia-to-Albania) is geographically in the way of this ober-strategy by Anglo-Saxon and Slav races. That’s the only reason why the Balkans is in the state of permanent turmoil. Namely, without brave Illyrians (some 20 million strong) enjoying a stable and prosperous state, the pope loses his most faithful guard, and he is thus being permanently disarmed. No wonder why England (a.k.a. never-enough-Great-Britain) is the 4th richest nation on Earth, though itself without any significant (comparatively) natural resources.

Sincerely,
Mensur Omerbashich

Whooo let the Turks in (is letting the Russians in)?

By the beginning of 15th century, the English spies in the eastern parts of the Christendom became aware of the preparations to create the Russian Empire. As a strategic counter-measure, England encouraged and financed the Ottoman (family's) aspirations to the throne of Turkey, hoping to create a shielding counter-empire able of picking fights with Russia, for England. Indeed, after the Great Russian Empire was created (under the auspices of the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1453), that same year the English signaled the Ottomans to march on Constantinople. Indeed, the Ottomans captured with great savagery the capital of the dying Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, thus ending the Roman Empire as well as the Mid Ages...

Immediately after taking over Constantinople (renamed then to Istanbul) and enacting their own Ottoman Empire instead, the now Ottoman Dynasty began returning favors to the English. There was no time to waste, so within a decade the Ottomans had rushed into the Balkans, conquering Bosnia in 1463. While annihilating the Bosnian Church, exterminating the Bosnian royalty, and burning down/leveling to the ground all traces of Bosnia's statehood such as more than 500 castles and churches (yet all 50,000 gravestones called stećci were left to this day as a scarecrow warning of a dead zone - a true No Man's Land!), Ottomans at the same time had left Serbia intact; moreover, Turkey had paid for 99% of all Serbia's churches to be built! Thus Serbia was turned into a reliable ally for future Turkish attacks on the (then entirely Catholic) Europe. A strong geostrategic shield was thus put in place that enabled England sweet dreams for centuries to come, while most of the continental Europe became a never-ending Warfield for geostrategic battles to be fought at, battles that will claim hundreds of millions of lives over the next five centuries...

Just like it brought the Bulgarian schismatic "Bogomilians" to Bosnia in the 11th century to prevent Bosnians from identifying themselves with Catholicism (and from consequently pledging allegiance to Vatican), England used the subsequent Turkish presence in the 16th century for the same purpose (via Islamization). In the same manner as in the previous cases, Austria was brought to Bosnia in 1878, just as Russia is being brought to Bosnia today - as we speak. In order to keep them in check so they never fly off the handle (that is: start thinking they're greater than what's needed for England's needs), England exposes its subdued allies to all sorts of historical burdens. Thus the entire Turkish people "got" the stigma of Armenian Genocide, the Germans "got" the Jewish Holocaust, and now all Serbs "got" the Srebrenica Genocide (limited - as Serbs aren't to be disposed of just yet!) What the English are doing here is using the Roman Empire's strategy of divide and rule very efficiently, where one tribe/people is used against another, however always in a different era and under seemingly contradictory geopolitical circumstances. (The English are careful to impact the mankind's history only for so much, where at least one average lifetime passes between consecutive havocs, so that no one could relate the events or connect them with England).

The famous "majesty" of the England's global dominance stems entirely from the willingness of the English (more precisely: their symbiotic diplomats and financiers) to manipulate the weaknesses of foreign regimes and their key individuals via the infamous unholy B-trinity of the Mid Ages: Blackmail them, or Bribe them, or Burn them. The shiny glamour of the English "culture" holds on to indisputable mountains of starched blood of the innocent. This 4th wealthiest nation in the world - yet itself without (comparatively) any significant natural resources whatsoever - has been using the best of its culprit minds (mostly Lords, then as nowadays, but today also some esteemed university professors) for the past 1600 years, that is, since the English bishops effectively separated from the Vatican. It's exclusively due to their culprit psyche, and not their qualities of any sort, that the English have become so unbelievably rich, so undeservedly powerful, and so unspeakably guilty.

Salisbury's secret cycle

The two historical moments that defined today's Bosnia were the occupation by Ottoman Turkey in 1463, and handing Bosnia over to Austria-Hungary in 1878. The latter undoubtedly defined Bosnia's destiny for centuries to come, which culminated in the heavy crisis she's going through as we speak. The current crisis is the consequence of unresolved questions from the 1878 Congress of Berlin. ("...the Congress failed to consider adequately the aspirations of the Balkan peoples and, thereby, laid the foundation for future crises in the Balkans", Britannica, 1999). But how did the change of occupation happen in the first place, and why? Moreover, how do entire countries (European at that!) simply "change hands", and how is this done over night? Of course, one correct answer is: via treason. Another correct answer is: via shameful betrayal of the national interests by domestic aristocracy and intellectuals whose personal gains (financial; career) became their only concern. The third correct answer is (why I'm not surprised) - Britain. Namely, the chief engineer of the monstrous project of replacing one occupationist in Bosnia with another was a British lord (why I'm not surprised, again) Robert Salisbury (1830-1903) [pictured right]. (He also had a train of funny sounding titles characteristic of brainwashed ant-like humans who adore (live for - die for) one person, akin of ants adoring their chief fatty insect). The details from his biography that are relevant for the Bosnia case are that he lost his mom at age 10, that he had such an unfortunate childhood that even his biographers couldn't avoid mentioning it, and that he was bullied big time all the way through his schooling. What a profile of a grow-up-to-become-a-Hitler!

.
Cartoon that appeared in European newspapers of 1878: German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, to British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, as they play gods discussing the Turkey-Austria switch on Bosnia: "I fancy our friend the Turk don't half like it?" Disraeli, a proud racist, replies: "Ha! That's another "Party" that will have to be "EDUCATED" "

.

The unresolved issues from the 1877 Russo-Turkish war had made a new war inevitable just one year later - this time between Russia and England (the Turkey's geostrategic "partner of a thousand years"). Britain became fearful, so British foreign minister Salisbury came up with the following genocidal plan. Since Turkey was getting weak as it was feudal and stretched on three continents, Bosnia was becoming a burden. At the same time, another British geostrategic partner of a thousand years, the industrial but smaller Austria (Austria-Hungary) had become desperate for resources and territory. But most importantly, Russia sought to expend into Bosnia, thus acquiring exit to the strategic mid-Adriatic waters... So, what did Salisbury do? He replaced the Ottoman occupation for the Austrian occupation. For this, he undertook secret diplomacy, and a cover-up "1878 Congress of Berlin" was set up within a week. In it, Austria pretended she was worried about the destiny of Bosnian Christians, and asked if she could occupy Bosnia. As expected, most European states sympathized. So in a single move Turkey has freed 100,000 soldiers and moved them from Bosnia to the Russian front, while Austria became enormously rich at the expense of her new colony Bosnia (minerals; 1st class forest). Austria's gains from Bosnia are estimated at over $100 billion worth today.

Russia realized that situation had changed, and the war preparations against England were called off. Bosnians entirely took Islam in the times English-ally Turkey occupied Bosnia in 1463 - as there were no Slavs in then-Bosnia. In order to make the handover appear unsuspicious to Bosnians, the secret diplomacy culminated with a staged armed resistance that took several thousand Bosnian lives. For his genocidal plan, queen Victoria awarded Salisbury the Order of the Garter, the highest decoration she could bestow. Conservative party was delighted with this man's cruelty , so they elected him the party president in 1885. He served as a British Prime Minister in three terms over 13 years, during which time he maniacally held on to his foreign minister post as well. In his mandate as a PM/foreign affairs minister, Salisbury's psychotic profile of a bullied kid simply exploded, and he personally redrew borders of most of the states in Africa, split up the entire Arabia into dozens of funny-shaped countries (drawing borders to match the oil reserves i.e. the oil companies' interests), reinstated cruelty in the British army - India in particular, occupied Cyprus and South Africa... For his cold-blooded dictatorship and cruelty he was dubbed the "PM with Imperial Ambitions" and "English Napoleon". That it was the case of madness can be seen from the way he raised his children too: his son lord Robert Cranborne (1893-1972) designed the apartheid regime of South African Republic. The other son, lord Edward Gascoyne-Cecil (1867-1917) was a colonial administrator of Egypt, and was known for cruelty and smuggling. Yet another son of Salisbury's, lord Robert Cecil (1864-1958), has founded in 1919 the "League of Nations" - the predecessor of the "United Nations"... Like father like sons, and these grabbing maniacs took a big bite of the cake themselves, so the Salisbury estate today is estimated at around $ 1 billion... Demonstrably, the world as we know it is a creation of a single dynasty of money-grabbing lunatics! (And by dynasty I don't mean just the Salisbury's, since the creation of the two key geostrategic points - the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal - was commissioned before and after Salisbury's terms, respectively, so the British collective never depends on any single person - it rather uses many individuals' relentnessness - relentlessly).

.

In his last interview, that appeared in Sunday Times of March 1980, Josip Broz "Tito" opened his heart and admitted that Yugoslavia was a mere creation set up for Britain's interests. This explains the illogical moves not characteristic of a communist leader, which Tito has taken during his lifelong reign, such as: why he never named his successor, why he (shortly before he died) prepared the country for dissolution by imposing a new Constitution of 1974 that invented federal units ready-made to become independent, and so on. In his death-bad interview, Tito recalled his meeting of 1944 with Winston Churchill in Naples (Napoli), Italy [pictured on the right]. They had agreed Tito would have Yugoslavia the way he wanted, in return for acting as a deterrent or a shield against the Soviet Union (but already in September he met with Stalin in Moscow, so the whole thing was a performance culminating in the Tito's 1948 staged "No!" to Stalin). The 1943 Teheran Conference took place ahead, leveling the ground for this agreement. But in the same week when the Teheran Conference was held, the 2nd Session of the so-called AVNOJ (communist supreme body) took place, pretending to mean an act of independence by Tito's partisans. So even Tito's famous "No!" to Stalin, of 1948, was just a materialization of the secret deal reached a few years earlier between Tito and the British...

.

When he realized how successful he was in the western Balkans, Salisbury made his idea a permanent one: whenever Russia gets strong - homogenize the Balkans, and whenever Russia gets weak - dissolve the Balkans. Make sure it's all done in secrecy and with bloodshed using unprecedented savagery. In order to see her plan always executed and then brought to the desired outcome, Britain has sponsored the creation of both the Chetniks (Serbian fascists) and the Ustashe (Croatian fascists). As a result, two Yugoslavias were created and dissolved so far. The first, in 1918, in response to the October Revolution of 1917 (that Britain financed herself through Rothschild family's credits to Lenin), resulting in the creation of the Soviet Union (SU). The first Yugoslavia then dissolved in blood as Russia (SU) became weak under Hitler's attacks. (Hitler too was on Rothschilds' credit-stub, which explains why he allowed Chetniks' and Ustashes' presence in Bosnia despite the Nazi propaganda from 1920-ies and on claiming racial non-Slavic purity of Bosnian Illyrians that Nazis saw as being Germans' kin). Second Yugoslavia was then resurrected in 1944, in response to the 1943 victory of the Red Army over Nazi Germany, enabling Russia (SU) to become stronger than ever. This second Yugoslavia was also dissolved in blood, in 1991, after the SU got dissolved in 1989 which had made Russia weakest since 1941.

.

By instating such a cyclic havoc upon the western Balkans, Britain re-attains a large maneuvering space in the geopolitical arena each time a new cycle of violence erupts. Although many developed nations with good intelligence services know very well what's going on, most nations are actually unaware it's Britain who sets the fire in the first place. Namely, Britain uses such times of crises to reinforce her image in the world as a superior nation able to solve even the gravest atrocities of the mankind. Her strategists are then called upon in many other areas of the world and asked for help and advice (the lord seems to be the Britain's best exporting produce). Imagine how easy it gets for Britain then to impose her own interests/will worldwide, by selling her own interests as - yours. It's a simple game really, no big science involved; in fact, it's made such a shallow game on purpose, precisely so that no one sane would ever believe it to be real. It's also a game that enables Britain to keep Slavic races at bay (see article of 17 September), though this isn't the primary concern of Britain's any more, as she's been a secret geostrategic ally of Russia's without interruption since 1917 at least. This is evident in Bosnian case too, from the fact that Tito himself had prepared the field for Yugoslavia's second collapse, but also from the recent events - because the so-called animosity between Russia and Britain/US today is clearly a faked one as Britain supported Serbia in 1992 too, i.e., when Russia was extremely weak. Therefore it cannot be that Britain/US are now afraid of Serbia when Russia is strong, either. Then the real reason behind the current crisis isn't the Bosnia-for-Kosovo trade, but the other way around: Kosovo-for-Bosnia, as Britain is trying to move the Orthodox frontier westward from the Drina River for the first time since the fall of the Roman Empire. The reasons why Britain is doing this (for which it has committed Genocide provably twice at least) is to create a tighter partnership with Russia for the upcoming actions against China, but also to harm the geostrategic position of her other (beside China) foe - the Vatican - by letting the Orthodox Church into the Vatican's "back yard". Lastly, there is her old goal as well: curb out the potentially only sovereign non-Christian tribe of all Europe - the Illyrians.

.

As you can imagine, given what I showed earlier (on the ignorance being as useful as knowledge is), the above story has never been told by any history textbook in fmr. Yugoslavia. (And they say conspiracies don't exist - obviously, the only possible conspiracy theory is the one which says that all conspiracies must be - theories!) Also, British history today largely ignores Mr. Salisbury, just like it tries to ignore the game of geostrategy, which is why the Encyclopedia Britannica, despite its century-old tradition, year after year "forgets" to mention GEOSTRATEGY. This happens because Britain benefited from Salisbury's criminal mind and global piracy more than she has ever benefited from anyone or anything else in her entire history - which, by the way, is a history of the world's biggest parasite (geoparasite) that's been selling mirrors and shiny glass jewelry to the mankind for over one and a half millennium now...

.

Who'd say that we (the world) are still buying it - and from the same bullied morons under cylinders. The beast must be confined within its own physical borders - for the good of humanity...

Bosnia, what's in the shape

World as the playground of three essentially racial axes and one religious axis for the past 1500 years

.

Thirst for material resources (and obviously for territories and aquatories containing those resources too) has been the driving force behind all grand outbursts of evil since the dawn of the mankind. As a result, there are four main axes so-called interest spheres in the world: the Anglo-Saxon (Britain + "Commonwealth", USA), the Slavic (Russia), the Chinese and the Catholic (Vatican) axis. The latter one is religious, while the first three are racial - for instance, when the Soviet Union dissolved no one has raised question of the Soviet permanent seat in the UN Security Council although it was the Soviet Union that founded the UN, not Russia. The Anglo-Saxon interest sphere has been dominating the world affairs practically since the so-called "fall of the Roman Empire" 1500 years ago. As a result, English is a primary international language of diplomacy, science, economy... Above depicted [see photo] are the world regions comprising territories over which the Anglo-Saxon financial/government interests have decisive influence, vs. such territories under the moral/ethical dominance of Vatican, vs. those territories that are under military and industrial dominance of Russia (and, separately, of China). Shown green are the most flammable separation lines between different geostrategic axes. Note Bosnia lying at the critical point of the Euro-Asian (Baltic-Bosnia-Arabia-India) strategic separator - meant to enclave the Slavic (Russia) and Chinese axes. Britain maintains Bosnia a hotspot by periodically imposing wars in here, as such permanent instability increases Britain's maneuvering space in world affairs with the rival axes. Similarly, the South American separator divides zones of the Vatican and Anglo-Saxon influences; the unnatural 15,000-km long border between Chile and Argentina (with Argentinean territory approaching the Pacific Ocean as close as 50 km at places, but never reaching it) is the most obvious materialization of a geostrategic separator, so for instance the Anglo-Saxon axis will even remove from power any democratic presidents in any nation west from the separator if he/she exhibits strategic disobedience to London. (A similar materialization of the Anglo-Saxon geostrategic shield is the Bosnia-Croatia southern border, unnaturally elongated since the Britain's strategic Asian ally Ottomans occupied Bosnia in 1463 in order to repel the then freshly-created Russia; colonies often have unnatural e.g. geometrically regular borders). Thus the Anglo-Saxon axis today controls effectively (via brute force and perversions of International law that only masks the real picture of the world we live in) the entire western coast in both of Americas. In this way, the planet's major transportation lines can be easily obstructed at Britain's will by just one or two conveniently selected points serving as the global bottlenecks. Other such spots firmly controlled by the Anglo-Saxon axis to this day are the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal in Arabia, as well as the Gibraltar door to the entire Mediterranean. Thus the main territory of the Anglo-Saxon axis is actually marked on the ground, so firmly in fact that Canada, as a Britain's geostrategic partner, recently announced she would ban all transit through the Arctic passage that's widening due to global warming; only in that way could Britain retain the high value of the Panama Canal. As a result of British imperialism that never disappears but only changes its shape and mask, today no South American nation spans territory coast-to-coast, unlike North American nations that both belong to the Anglo-Saxon axis. Note that smaller geostrategic players exist as well, such as France or Japan, however they are allowed to enter the game only occasionally, and play their brief role in return for a promised share in form of bits and pieces of the Anglo-Saxon pie.

.

In the midst of all the gulfs and fronts, at the meeting point of three major geostrategic axes, lies Bosnia (Illyria proper). Three major geostrategic axes that are playing the role in the Balkans for the last 1500 years or so, and that have shaped Bosnia to her present unnatural (triangular) shape, are: the Slavic, the Anglo-Saxon and the Catholic (Vatican) axis. (For instance, constant fighting for power between the latter two is the reason why "Freemasons" - a British Trojan Horse created to manipulate the Third World leaders - are so preoccupied with denouncing Catholicism.) Bosnia is only one of several hotspots of this geostrategic fighting, but situation with Bosnia is particularly difficult in that respect, given her three-corner position along the most important separator. Thus the first two axes use mostly methods of special warfare in order to periodically destroy Bosnia's essence (i.e., its unhampered brotherhood between various faiths and races, as due to the country's crossroads position) and thereby secure their own supremacy over Bosnia. Main methods of special warfare they're using are: 1. cause localized wars by creating, sponsoring and cyclically fueling ethnic extremists such as Chetniks, Ustashe and Mujahadeen with resources and opportunities; 2. bribe local politicians so that they obey the axes entirely, including to commit treason; 3. impose strict media and judiciary control that disable mechanisms of nationalism as the only able enemy of globalism (meaning: globalization hijacked for interests of any of the given axes). It's really remarkable that any human activity, let alone science as the most complex one of all, has remained largely intact, although clear signs of elitism and unscientific control along the geostrategic axes' borders do exist in science as well.

.

The three axes, which dominate Bosnia for a millennium and a half, have huge amounts of accumulated wealth, manpower and weaponry at their disposal. However, the Vatican axis possesses no armed forces, which it makes up by playing on the card of human weaknesses - if you can't control peoples' bodies, then you can try to capture their hearts instead. The first two axes are then very dangerous to the existence of Bosnia's essence (but never of Bosnia herself, as each axis aspires to subduing entire Bosnia at any given time); as soon as her population becomes truly brotherly - which is a natural state of spirits due simply to Bosnia's position - a new cycle of bloodshed gets brought upon it. Thus no war has ever taken place in Bosnia that wasn't imported from the outside.

.

The only true (and largely utopist) solution for the world is to abandon the metal-monetary tranquility (perceived as such by 99% of the world), as most of the power of the Anglo-Saxon axis stems from loans that most governments of the world owe to the Rothschild family and other western bankers that are in business for over one millennium. The only solution for Bosnia, that could also bring a long-lasting stability to all three involved axes in the coming centuries of ever-modernizing warfare, is to soon enable and encourage the self-structuring of a homogeneous, non-Slavic, secular Bosnian nation with strong, centralized state within the Illyria's (proper) natural land/sea borders. Just like the Anglo-Saxon axis had supplied other hotspots such as India, Pakistan or Israel with nuclear weapons, Bosnia and the Baltic region must also go nuclear in order for the axis shield to be completely put in place. However, should no such solution occur for Bosnia, then the world could necessarily face retributions by depraved 1% of the mankind that has been left as "food for lions". Probably, such retaliations could attain unpredictable forms, as no axis could control it, unlike the present-day "terrorism" of Al-Qaeda or Wahhabis that are both just another geostrategic creation of the Anglo-Saxon axis (other axes have created their own like creatures albeit not as relevant globally).

Bosnia-H%z$w&#a, what's in the name

Imagine a European country in which official history teaches for over a century that "no one knows how the country became" or cannot explain why the country was named the way it was named. In addition, all official discussions of that country's history since the Antiquity and on, carry compulsory labels that say: "very little known about", "not understood", "very little evidence" etc. Well, imagine no more, for that country is Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hmm, Bosnia and what? Oh, you thought I said Bosnia and Southern Bosnia... Because, doesn't "Herzegovina" stand for a southern region of the country, named after Duke (German: Herzog) Stjepan Kosača, a medieval landowner of that region's largest chunk?

.

You heard it correct!

.

Imagine now some "mysterious" force renaming your country, by adding to its millennium-old name also the name of one of its parts. Is nonsense like that possible in real life? For instance, if you live in France, this could sound something like "France and Corsica"... Whew! Did I just split your France apart, you ask? You bet I did!

.

Now, imagine it's year 1853.

.

Bosnia (officially called so until 1853) is under the Ottoman occupation. Totally out-of-the-blue, the occupationist administration renames the country to "Bosnia and Herzegovina". Around that time, Croatia, then under occupation by the Austria-Hungarian Empire, also gets renamed to "Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia". Twenty five years later, equally "mysteriously", Bosnia changes hands from the Ottoman to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, keeping her name. While Croatia managed to get rid of her ridiculous name soon after she got it, 154 years later and Bosnia today still has her same ol' ridiculous name... (I say ridiculous because it's even less logical than the above example: unlike Corsica, Herzegovina is a mere geographical term without known physical borders).

.

The fact that Croatia has managed to get out of the Twilight Zone so fast, and the fact that a veil of secrecy still surrounds the renaming of the two countries (official histories in Bosnia and Croatia virtually don't refer to this crucial event), point at one possible explanation: the renaming was done with "oberpolitics" (geostrategy) in mind, or, more precisely, for the purpose of colonization in this case. Not only that Bosnia today is still called "Bosnia and Herzegovina", but she recently (in Dayton in 1995) got stripped of her "Republic" status too, making it quite obvious that Bosnia is the last unofficial colony in the world. If you recall those school lessons on safari-Africa, in colonies you can kill or rape or destroy or loot pretty much anything that moves or holds any value, without ever having to pay a price. Which brings us to the issue of "Republika Srpska" a genocidal creature also recently (in Dayton 1995) placed on the map of Europe - by that same Europe...

.

After the world got rid of South African apartheid regime, Bosnia with its colonial status remains the last shameful spot of the world (that stands united under one International Law, right? Wroooong!). Alernatively, it could also be that Bosnia is the first shameful spot of the world of tomorrow - under the New World Order.

.

Apparently, as always, the choice is (y)ours.

Britain - complicit to genocide, TWICE!

xx xxxxxxxxx, xxxx

.

Exercising her free will and the rights reserved as stated in the earlier proceedings in this case [see below]; Following the 14 years of delays under Britain-instated duress in the Bosnia v. Serbia case; Unsatisfied with the obviously unjust verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case by the International Court in Hague presided by an English woman; the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is hereby suing the United Kingdom and other states previously implicated as stated in the above, for GENOCIDE.

.

The fact that the United Kingdom was twice complicit to genocide proves not just her complicity any more, but the act of genocide itself. The specific crimes of genocide that the United Kingdom has committed are as follows:

1. in 1992, she lead a group of UN-member nations that instated arms embargo to fmr. Yugoslav republics. The arms embargo had de facto affected only the Government of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, preventing her using her rights for self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter that states: "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security."

2. in 1995, she actively opposed military intervention by the UN and NATO that would enforce protection of the UN "safe zone" in Srebrenica. This resulted in deaths of over 8,000 unarmed men, women and children.

3. in 1995-1996, she and her allies imposed the so-called "Dayton Peace Accord" that was designed in a way so to create an "impossible regime" by recognizing the results of aggression and genocide, with the de facto effect of further exhausting the civilian population of the plaintiff, with the genocidal goal of depopulating the country of its major ethnic group.

4. in 2006, she and her allies threatened for three days and two nights the MP's of the Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina who were in a permanent marathon session, that they must finally ratify the Dayton Peace Accord by amending it, but the Parliament has refused to do so.

5. in 2006, she arranged untimely and insufficiently documented death of Serbia's fmr. President Slobodan Milošević in his prison cell at the War Tribunal for fmr. Yugoslavia, thus preventing his deposition and case to become the crucial parts of the verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case before the International Court.

6. in 2007-2008, during the Kosovo second crisis, and following the Bosnia's general elections of November 2006 in which the patriotic MP's and their parties won the popular vote, she and her allies nevertheless continued pressuring the Bosnian authorities while forcing them to ratify the never-ratified and never-officially-translated Dayton Peace Accord and thereby enable full international recognition of the genocidal state so-called "Republika Srpska".

7. at least between 1991-2007, she and her allies designed and committed acts of subversive actions, illegal intelligence operations, parallel public-hoax operations ("Bosnian pyramids" project designed to divert public attention in a critical moment), bribe of local officials, media control/oppression, judiciary and legislative subversions, prevention of Bosnia's access to international waters, illegal export of timber and minerals, unlawful arrests, kidnapping of Bosnian citizens, as well as other illicit activities, in order to achieve her long-term so-called strategic goals in the Balkans.

8. in 2007, she imposed her geostrategic will upon the international order by having her citizen who presided the Bosnia v. Serbia case run the process in a way that, as well as swing the vote of other judges and justices in the direction that, benefits her strategic goals in the Balkans. One of such strategic goals is the part of the verdict that claims Serbia owes no damages to the plaintiff despite the factual (documented) war damages exceeding USD 100 billion, which does not include punitive damages for at least 100,000 deaths, more than half a million wounded, and more than 2 million displaced individuals, all this despite the documented presence and decisive involvement of the formal Serbian military forces on the plaintiff's territory and aquatory during 1992-1995. This clearly implicates her as not only an accomplice in the Bosnian genocide (1992-1995) any more, but now it exposes her as a UN-member state that has been willingly committing various acts of genocide against the people of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

9. by committing the above crimes, she placed herself above the international law, and purposely broke numerous international conventions to which she herself officially abides.

10. for committing the above crimes, the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is going to seek material and other types of reparations from the United Kingdom. The plaintiff reserves the right to seek reparations for damages dated prior to 1991, based on the available documentation from her earlier imperial involvements in Bosnia of centuries ago.

.

.

******************************

CASE HISTORY

.

.

.

STATEMENT OF INTENTION BY THE REPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA TO INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
.
15 November, 1993
.

Today, the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina hereby states our solemn intention to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom before the International Court of Justice for violating the terms of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; of the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; and of the other sources of general international law set forth in Article 38 of the World Court's Statute. We have already issued formal instructions to that effect to our Attorneys-of-Record before the World Court. They are currently drafting an Application and a Request for Provisional Measures against the United Kingdom. We have instructed our lawyers to file these papers with the World Court as soon as physically possible. In the meantime, we hereby reserve all of our international legal rights against the United Kingdom:
.

I. Both the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Kingdom are contracting parties to the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Article IX
of the Genocide Convention:

Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfillment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of State for genocide or for any of the other acts enumerated in article III, shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.

.

We will sue the United Kingdom for violating the following provisions of the Genocide Convention, inter alia:
First, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has failed in their affirmative obligation and refused "to prevent" genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of Article I of the Genocide Convention, which provides as follows:"The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in the time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish." Second, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has illegally imposed and maintained an arms embargo upon the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51 while acting in its capacity as a Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council. The United Kingdom has also aided and abetted the ongoing genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina by actively opposing all of the efforts by other States to "lift" this illegal arms embargo. For these reasons, we will charge that the United Kingdom has violated Article III, paragraph (e) of the Genocide Convention that expressly prohibits "complicity in genocide." The legal basis for this charge has been developed at length by Judge ad hoc Elihu Lauterpacht in his Separate Opinion attached to the World Court's Order of 13 September 1993 in the Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), which is currently pending. Finally, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom is both jointly and severally liable for all of the harm that has been inflicted upon the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina because the United Kingdom is an aider and abettor to genocide under the Genocide Convention and international criminal law.
.

In drafting these legal pleadings for the World Court, and during the course of the subsequent proceedings, our lawyers will also name and implicate other Member States of the U.N. Security Council that have supported this illegal arms embargo in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51, as aiders and abettors to genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We will not sue these other States at this time.
. We also serve notice upon all of the more than 100 Contracting Parties to the Genocide Convention that each and every one of them has a solemn legal and moral obligation "to prevent" the commission of genocide in and against the People and State of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as required by Article I.
.
.

II. Both the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Kingdom are also contracting parties to the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Article 22 thereof provides as follows:
.

Article 22

Any dispute between two or more States Parties over the interpretation or application of this Convention, which is not settled by negotiation or by the procedures expressly provided for in this Convention, shall at the request of any of the parties to the dispute be referred to the International Court of Justice for decision, unless the disputants agree to another mode of settlement.

.

The United Kingdom has promoted options, ostensibly as solutions to the aggression against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, that are inconsistent with the terms of this treaty.

.
****
.

This Statement was circulated to all Members of the United Nations Organization, and will also be filed with the International Court of Justice.
.
Professor Francis A. Boyle
Law Building 504
E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, Ill.
61820

****************************

.
3 January 1994

.
Professor Boyle ("the author") called the Registrar of the International Court of Justice in order to make three basic Points to him for transmission to the Judges of the World Court:
.
1. The Bosnian decision to withdraw the lawsuit against the United Kingdom was made under duress, threats, and coercion perpetrated by the British government and the governments of several other European states upon the highest level officials of the Bosnian government in Geneva, London, and Sarajevo. Therefore the so-called agreement to withdraw the lawsuit against Britain was void ab initio. I reserved the right of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to denounce this agreement at any time and to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom in accordance with the Statement of 15 November 1993.
.
2. The British government demanded that the author be fired as the General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Court. The British government knew full well that the author was the one responsible for the Bosnian strategy at the World Court, and especially for the recommendation to sue Britain.
.
3. Toward the end of conversation with the Registrar on 3 January 1994, the author made an oral Request that the World Court indicate provisional measures proprio motu in order to protect the People and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina from extermination and annihilation by the rump Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia. He pointed out to the Registrar that this oral Request was in accordance with the terms of the written Request for provisional measures proprio motu in advance that was already set forth in Bosnia's Second Request for Provisional Measures of 27 July 1993. The Registrar informed him that the Court was paying close attention to the situation in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Pursuant to Point 2, above, the author was relieved of his responsibilities as General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the World Court on 12 January 1994.

GEOSTRATEGY, what's in the word

"Geostrategy, a subfield of geopolitics, is a type of foreign policy guided principally by geographical factors as they inform, constrain, or affect political and military planning. As with all strategies, geostrategy is concerned with matching means to ends—in this case, a country's resources (whether they are limited or extensive) with its geopolitical objectives (which can be local, regional, or global). According to Gray and Sloan, geography is "the mother of strategy." Geostrategists, as distinct from geopoliticians, advocate proactive strategies, and approach geopolitics from a nationalist point-of-view. As with all political theories, geostrategies are relevant principally to the context in which they were devised: the nationality of the strategist, the strength of his or her country's resources, the scope of their country's goals, the political geography of the time period, and the technological factors that affect military, political, economic, and cultural engagement." (Wikipedia)
.
Isn't it remarkable indeed that GEOSTRATEGY, a word so important and so frequently cited (Google returns: 100,000) cannot be found in a high-esteemed encyclopedia such as the most famous and most praised one of them all - the Britannica? Things omitted can indeed matter more than things considered. Thus is the case with the Britannica that, to make things even weirder, does report on strategy - from the battlefield to the national level - but stops short of reporting on geostrategy as the "strategy of all strategies". It's with this thought in mind that I write this blog. My goal is to expose those geostrategies that are the culprit behind the millennial suffering of the Bosnian people.

.

I started one month ago today, with a curious case of the "Bosnian pyramids" and the surprising involvement of Russia's geostrategist Khavroshkin [See my other blog http://omerbashich.blogspot.com/] Unfortunately, as it turned out by now, not only that the case isn't about archaeology at all, but it isn't about the corruption of Bosnian officials either; the two (too obvious) views held mostly by people who possess admirable education, but in a field unrelated to geostrategy.

.