Saturday, January 30, 2010

New blog announcement

See a new blog on World for (making) dummies:
a
Only truth matters!

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Omerbashich Dynasty - dinastija Omerbasic

I finally had time to compile a royal family tree (kraljevsko porodično stablo, in Bosnian) of the Omerbašić dynasty. For those who don't know, members of all 200-some Omerbashich families (Anglicized spelling; the pro-Byzantium spelling is Omerbašić; see below for a Bosnian version of the tree) represent the successor dynasty to the Bosnian and Serbian thrones, and possibly to the throne of England (Britain) as well. We are the direct (paternal) descendants of the first Ban and Viceroy of Bosnia, Boril Borić (also: Borič), and the heirs apparent to the extinguished House of Kotromanić. Ban Borič was the Bosnia's founding father - a Black Knight (Templar) sent after the Second Crusade by the Pope in 1154 to create a fender-state at the border between the Western and the Byzantine Empires, newly revived due to the Church Schism and for the first time after the collapse of the Roman Empire five centuries earlier. But Borič could also be young Eustace IV, the heir apparent to the throne of England, who was known for his savagery and battlefield mercilessness. The Pope refused to appoint him as the king of England in 1152, stating his evilness as an excuse, which enabled the Rome to give the throne of England to the Church's allies, the French first dynasty of Anjou. The fact that England at one time in its history was so close to collapse just because they had only one heir apparent (after his brother was killed, and family was scarce), will become the main motivation behind the English monarchs frenetically intermarrying other royal Houses around Europe, so that nowadays there are 2000 individuals in the Line of Succession to the British throne -- the world's record of all times. As for the Count Eustace IV, he "mysteriously" disappeared in 1153, aged 25. He could have been ousted as the only heir to the throne of England by the Church, and as part of his punishment sent off to Bosnia as the then-easternmost border of the Western Christendom, to utilize his alleged savagery in fighting against the Byzantine. This could be true because his coat of arms (pictured right), discovered in 2003, obviously is that of a Royal (barred helmet, purple ostrich feathers) Black Knight, but with heraldic symbols of disgrace (such as bend sinister and a rat). If so, Omerbašićs hold a rightful claim for the heir apparent to the throne of England (Britain), taking priority over any subsequent English Houses' claims. The very surname Borič is unusual, and it stems from Breuci, the name of the large Illyrian tribe that inhabitted the area and was known for its bravery in the Third Illyrian War it waged against the Rome in 6 A.D.

Soon after the Pope urged the Hungarian monarch to name Borič to the throne of Bosnia, the Normans (an English tribe) invaded Italy, forcing the Pope to enter into alliance with the only available military power around -- the Byzantines. But the Byzantines had already partnered with the English, after the English regained in 1154 their stability (outsmarting the Pope by using his French to stabilize England for the English), which they had previously lost to a grave anarchy dealt to them by the Church and which devastated England for decades. Because the same Pope who had sent Borič to found a new state Bosnia, has now sided with the Byzantines in exchange for their help in saving his papacy from the invading Normans, the Holy See officially lost interest in East European affairs. The Byzantines then took advantage of this, and bribed the uncles of the child-King of Hungary, who hire Hungarian mercenaries Gutkeleds to depose Borič, in 1163. The Byzantines' intention was to seat their patsy instead. However, a grave instability in Rome and the fights over the right for papacy (resulting in two Antipopes named by the Holy Roman Emperor Barbarossa without consent from the Church which elected their own Pope, in exile), halted them for fifteen years. As those internal problems of Rome's were losing up, with the help of the Church-chosen new Pope and in exchange for the Byzantine's support in his fighting Barbarossa, the Byzantines assassinate the now adult King of Hungary (former child-King), at age 23, after he took powers back from his corrupt uncles and started fighting the Byzantines naively (as a good Catholic kid unaware of the Pope's bigger worries than just saving the souls). The Byzantines then install his brother who was raised at their court, as the King of Hungary, and supply him with enormous quantities of gold. This made him one of the richest monarchs of Europe, which in turn made the Church-elected Pope again influential as he crowned one powerful King, thus fending off Barbarossa who allows the new Pope to return to Rome in 1179. The new Hungarian patsy of the Byzantine Empire then installs in 1180 as a new Ban of Bosnia one traitor -- an 18-year old soldier named Kulin, who then proclaims a new pro-Byzantine (anti-Church) dynasty, the House of Kulinić. As one sappy local myth would have it, the times of Ban Kulin were amongst most peaceful in Bosnia's history. It was nothing but treason, surrender, a sort of what goes on today too, because the only thing that Kulin brought to Bosnia was the Bulgarian sect so-called Bogomils, so that the Bosnians be diverted from the Catholic faith. This delusion will cost them their freedom of mind for the next half millennium, as it will soon be replaced by Islam brought in by the Ottomans who adjusted Islamic symbolics (added the Crescent) so to capture the hearts of Bosnians whose symbol of adoration since the Illyrian Kingdom and through the Bogomils, was precisely the Crescent.

Royal Knight Borič was the common paternal ancestor to all other Bosnian dynasties: Boričević, Kotromanić, and Berislavić. But in the 15th century the Pope's then-already worst nightmare a.k.a. the English royals enlisted help of their buddies-to-become a.k.a. the Ottoman dynasty. This was to add to the "fine" company made of rulers of Hungary, Serbia and other European lands, who by then already turned against the Holy See, thus gathered in the Order of the Dragon that continues its high antipapal activities to this day. For example, the Order had furnished the Ottomans with tons of gold as well as secret 23 m long supercannons to enable the Turks to savagely capture Constantinople, in 1453. In return, the Ottomans immediately marched on Rome to conquer it. On their way, they annihilated Bosnia's statehood, killing Bosnia's last crowned King Tomašević in 1463, and leveling to the ground all of its 500 castles. No other country received such a savage treatment by the Ottomans, as Bosnia did... It was all playing well for the Order of the Dragon. It had previously softened the field for the Turks: its founder King Sigismund of Hungary was a madman who led in 1408 the massacre at Dobor (see post of 9 April, 2009), of most of Bosnia's nobility (over 200 families) including his wife's cousins. This also removed most of Bosnia's Generals too, so crucial for the country's defense. (The Order was also fundamentally attacking the Church: by sponsoring one Jan Hus; and after the Church defended itself from Hus, the Order then sponsored one Martin Luther, and kept so on and on, subverting the Church in the following centuries and decimating it into hundreds of fractions, which continues to this day.) Bosnia's nobility resisted valiantly long after 1463, so that Turkey was able to establish its first administration, called Eyalet of Bosnia, only in 1527. The Sultan sent his Admiral to Spain with the Emperial Ship to drag over elite Sephardic Jews who were elite-for-pay. They took Islam and were given the invented nobility titles such as "Beys" and "Aghas". They thus became the most powerful capos of the Balkans for England's interests and they remain such to this day. They rule Bosnia as we speak, and are easily recognized by their last names' suffixes of begić, begović, agić, agović, etc. Most prominent amongst these today are Izetbegovićs, Tihićs, Gavrankapetanovićs...

The Ottomans believed that by executing the last crowned ruler of Bosnia King Tomašević, in 1463, they were also eradicating the Bosnia's ruling bloodline. But soon the Ottomans discovered in battlefield that the Bosnia's ruling bloodline was well and kicking (thank you very much). Brave brothers Generals Franjo and Ivaniš Berislavić, direct descendants of Ban Borič, led the fierce resistence from north and west. When the Turks became too strong in Bosnia, Ivaniš's son Stjepan tried to trick them by posing as their tactical but not strategic ally. Namely, he would not convert to Islam, not even under the death threat by Gazi-Husref Bey the commander of the occupying forces and Sultan's grandson (who therefore knew how paramount it was to eradicate the ruling bloodline in a Christendom country). Stjepan was the first one to join the Turks in arms, to the amazement of other Catholic nobility. But it didn't take long for the Ottomans to realize that subduing Bosnia by decapitating its last crowned King Tomašević or by taking away all of Queen Katarina's children to Turkey to raise them Muslim did not end the bloodline. Namely, the first Kotromanić, Prijezda I, who was a Berislavić and who ended the pale Kulinić Dynasty while starting his own House of Kotromanić (named after his ancestor and Borič's adversary German mercenary Kotroman), was at the same time a direct descendant of Ban Borič. And so was Stjepan too, as the leading Berislavić. So after the sad ending of the Kotromanićs, Stjepan Berislavić remained the King Apparent of Bosnia (paternally) and Despot-in-exile of Serbia (matrilineally). In order to finish up what they had started by murdering King Tomašević and kidnapping child heirs apparent, the Turks execute Stjepan Berislavić too, in 1535 at age 33.

Like Stjepan his heirs too were aware of gravity of the situation. Faced with the looming extinction of the Bosnia's only rightful bloodline, they decide to convert to Islam under obvious duress, just as with Stjepan, King Tomašević, or Queen Katarina. In doing so, they change their last name from Berislavić (Berislavicci) to Omerbašić (Omerbassicci in Romanized spelling). The new surname came from: Omer & Basha. A non-Turk of the era would understand this as Semitic for the Firstborn King (in Arabic and Hebrew, respectively), i.e. the Dynasty founder. This was a Red Herring aimed at the Ottomans, as in Turkish this meant simply -- one Lord Omer. Being brave and sharp as their ancestors, Duke Ivan Omerbašić (of whose name and title records survive to this day) is a proof that Berislavićs were trying to save the rightful dynasty of Bosnia's, Serbia's and probably England's too, from biological extinction. (The remaining noble families descending from Ban Borič had either remained in Croatia or fled to Hungary, while other Dynasty lines got eradicated.) His Duchy of Dubočac lasted until 1691 when Count Erdödy attacked the Turks to regain Slavonia. The House of Berislavić Omerbašić, led by the Franciscans and Duke Ivan Omerbašić retreats, not to Croatia, not to Hungary, but deeper in Bosnia. The Berislavić Omerbašić Dynasty, as the only Royal apparents in Bosnia, had thus settled the northern (Tuzla-Odžak), eastern (Foča-Ustikolina) and central (Maglaj-Tešanj) region of the country.

We as dynasts survive to this day, and can be found practically exclusively in those same locations as four centuries ago. Bosnia survives too, despite disguised Sephardic Jews' continuing on with their game of subversion. After having been kicked out of yet another country for their n-th attempt to capture its economy through favoritism and schemes instead of craft and merit, they were brought to Bosnia in 1492 by the Ottomans who were the conquerors at the time. Thus no one has ever asked Bosnians or their authentic rulers for opinion in this matter. So it's pointless for Jews nowadays to thank Bosnians for "accepting" them in 1492. Taking up Islam themselves, these Sephardis will become Bosnia's surrogate aristocracy ('Beys' and 'Aghas'), replacing the rightful, dethroned and slain Bosnian nobility. These English capos of the Balkans pull major strings in Bosnia during the past few centuries. Today they are gathered around political party SDA. Their seemingly moronic (as no treason looks intelligent, Bosnians are merely being played!) strategic moves are all aimed against Catholicism and Bosnians. Just imagine: Bosnia is the only country in the world which doesn't allow for its citizens to claim in censuses their nationality as that belonging to their nation - Bosnians - because, simply, it does not exist under the law. Everyone must officially proclaim to be something else, a "Serb", a "Croat", a "Bosniak" (legally: a Turkish minority). This mind-occupation of Bosnia(ns) continues, serving to the Balkans agenda of the English monarchs ("how to send the Pope to hell"), who are the Sephardis' masters and partners in crime world-wide.

Bringing in an "elite for pay" to administer a province on behalf of its conqueror was a common practice in the times of old. Thus when 10000 Avar horsemen captured Bosnia from the Byzantine (6th-9th century), the Avars hired services of a nomadic tribe called Kutrigurs, in the same manner the Ottomans will drag the Sephardis over, in 1492. But the role of the elite Jews in Bosnia is far more sinister, as they were/are the means for maintaining the mind-occupation of Bosnia for long after the Ottomans were gone. As already proven by the Byzantine and Avar occupations, the Anglo-Saxon long-term agenda of preventing Catholicism from settling in Bosnia could not be accomplished by military and bureaucracy alone. It could only be achieved via a fundamental change of the occupied people’s mindset, i.e. through a religion as powerful as Catholicism. To that effect, while making preparations 1454-1462 for annihilation of Bosnia’s statehood, the Ottomans have actually changed the very symbolism of Islam by introducing the Crescent. Bosnian Illyrians were known as fierce fighters since the Ancient Rome. But they were already influenced by the unassuming and seemingly good-intentioned sect of "Bogomils" (that also used the Crescent symbolics) which was brought to Bosnia during Middle Ages by traitor Kulin in yet another failed attempt by the English and their allies Byzantines to avert Bosnians from Catholicism/Rome. Both the Bogomillic and Islamic late use of Crescent with Star just before their penetrating Bosnia, was aimed at endearing those ideologies to the Illyrians of Bosnia - the last few non-assimilated Illyrian tribes of the Balkans. This because the Crescent and the Venus were also two chief symbols of the Ancient Illyrians, and had been deeply embedded in the tradition and culture of Bosnia. It was only by the way of symbolism such as the Crescent/Venus, that Bosnians could swallow the Islam bait, remaining hooked on it for centuries to come.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Nature of mud

Who hasn't heard of a journal called "Nature". Check out any media that reports science news, and it jumps at you right away: Nature says... Occasionally, its "counterpart", called "Science", fills in when Nature is away on vacation, as they are roomies living under the same roof belonging to the same landlord. Every West must have its East, every Left must have its Right, every Coke must have its Pepsi. And that's that, in a faked reality-show at least. But how do 'science news', which in most cases are minted under the pens of Nature editors, end up displayed on your screen, and deep-drilled inside your eyes and ears? The shortest answer is: via world's largest news agencies of course, Reuters or AP, as well as large news mills such as CNN or BBC. Coincidentally, they all belong to the same group of bankers and royals, called The Bilderberg groupies, who, for over a millennium and under various names and pretexts, desire to rule the world (scientifically extrapolating -- probably longer and deeper than what is known!).

Nature's bestseller was the Einstein's nonsense-theory called "General Relativity". In that fairiest world of imagination ever created, Time is a living being, black holes hide stuff where sun shines not (b-holes; get the joke?), while jetting elevators and never ageing brothers spark imagination of small children. Faced with grave opposition by the leading minds of the time, like Tesla or Jeffreys, the groupies had come up with a brilliant idea: sell the utter nonsense to the unsuspecting public directly, thus bypassing the most relevant minds for debate altogether! (Yes, we are seeing the same method used again to "handle" the Climate Warming scam). Times paper then joined in, and the legend was to be made. Dr. Drude, the editor who accepted Einstein's plagiarist paper, died under suspicious circumstances immediately after accepting it. Eddington, the astronomer who did the sloppiest job of proving a theory, allegedly "proved" the Einstein's theory in 1919, and was in return rewarded by King who issued a pardon for astronomer's deserting in World War I (trading firing squad for world fame isn't such a bad deal after all). And the rest was meant to be history... Alas, a hundred years and hundreds of billions of dollars later, it became obvious that Einstein was wrong for about 97%, as this is by how much the astrophysical models based on his theory fail to predict the mass of the Universe. A trifle... It turns out that all the greatest minds who laughed at him then, had done it righfully so. Instead of listening to those minds, our ancestors and teachers alike were made to believe the storytelling from Nature and Times!

When Climategate erupted last month, and literally knocked down the Copenhagen and all future gatherings of the sort, thin air traders Al Gore and Michael Mann became a heavy burden for Nature. Its pillars for the past decade, just like Einstein was for the past century, Gore and Mann have incidentally created the first circumstantial evidence in history, if by shear repetition, of a clear-cut conspiracy aimed at capping of our minds and keeping them so tightly shut for ever, and ever, and ever. So Nature seems to have promptly dumped the duo; they are nowhere to be seen: Gore confined to the blogosphere, and Mann down-downgraded to scripting editorials for bankrupt newspapers. After years of living in denial and refusing to believe in man-made climate change, I admit I finally succumbed to the overwhelming bastardism of the duo, of Nature, and of their global wannabe-government The Bilderbergs, so from now on I believe in -- Mann-made climate change.

But the mud that Nature is, was obvious for quite some time to those who wanted to see, i.e. who didn't need a scandal of the Climategate caliber. After killing a few papers from "the world's leading scientific journal", I was faced with a brutal reality that Nature might be a political agenda and nothing more. Soon after, I found out that its senior editor named Henry Gee was a fulltime biggot, racist, and openly a Muslim hater (not that I'm religious). After reporting his racism to some trillionaire from Germany who actually owns Nature, Gee was disciplined by a warning, while his fascist blog was promptly deleted by the service provider. Dr. Gee however is still making crucial decisions at Nature, as according to editor-in-chief, "they have been buddies for ten years". Now, that's a sort of a criterion to bow to! But the gallery of characters of Mann and Gee type is resourceful indeed. While learning more and more about Nature, I came across a geophysics editor who, on a closer look, greenlights mostly papers written by his former Department's alumni. Now, that's another criterion to bow to, isn't it. Not to mention Nature's Web Site where dirty tricks (resembling those seen at Wikipedia) are used to mute any real debate: by locking of comment fields when debate becomes to-the-point, by mocking of posts that touch on real debate issues, by deleting entire recent pages after caching them with false summary and then redirecting, etc. Not to mention their support for eugenics (quasi-scientific genocide) giving room to darkest ideology such as http://www.optimumpopulation.org/ Institute that recommends "downsizing" of the world population, in such a detailed and sickening manner that makes Josef Mengele look like a novice (check out their Tables detailing each country's proposed "human cleansing": declaring for example that 3 out of 4 million Bosnians are "surplus", just like they claim 3-5 billion people overall are). Not to mention a military-linked reviewer of Nature, who wrote to me once that "everybody knows that most Nature papers are wrong, anyway"...

I could go on like this for days, but let's stop here. Climategate, Relativegate, this gate, that gate... (Are you too picturing a Farmacogate in the making?) Once a crook, always a crook. One thing is sure: science in the near future, just like the world it tries to safeguard and eventually save, won't look anything like science of yesterday. No false flag of any sort, be it even nuclear (as is likely to come sooner than later), is able to subdue a people let alone the entire humankind. For truth is the utter peace of a rational mind, and all bodies tend to assume a resting position, according to what real science has to say. My dear reader: don't forget that real science -- fairytales and quadrillionaire-wannabes absent -- does exist, and it is well-intentioned towards the human. It's just that it has been highjacked centuries ago, muted and mutilated alike, yet it is all that more eagerly waiting to be liberated from the shackles of corrupt executive governments and imbecile royals and their bookies, who simply misuse evil and weaknesses within each one of us, as a weapon aimed at all of us.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Belfast Phase is an excuse to end Bosnia

It took a mere day and a half of one poorly staged performance at the NATO military base in Butmir near Sarajevo, to see right through the circus entirely. In this sorry-arse event (see preceding article), undeservedly dubbed by media the "Dayton Two", all of Bosnia's "leading politicians" took part. However, most of them are actually MI6 players (surrogate Muslim aristocrats) and known (as in: documented and publicized about) agents of the Serbian SDB-Intelligence!

It has become obvious after the play that all the actors, directors and screenplay writers had actually gathered in Butmir only to mimic the original Dayton gathering, while in actuality they drank, ate, and scared the hell out of the public exhausted in the past two decades, with statements such as "Bosnia will collapse unless we compromise". Actually, it is now obvious that the opposite applies! In order to prepare the terrain for the dissolution of one of the world's oldest nations, they and their western masonic mentors are softening the Bosnia's patriots, first by increasing bloody incidents around the country (see preceding article), and as of today also by throwing in baits such as alleged proposals to create "common national government" and "single office of the President", offering "NATO membership", "EU candidacy status", "visas lifting" and, as a cream to top it off, they offer to abolish the "ethnic parliamentary vote" (but only in one of two Houses, so the proposal is meaningless!).

Of course, none of that really matters, and is/are mere food for spectators who have opened their jaws, ready to swallow the idiocy of all idiocies. What really and only matters in Bosnia, today as ever, is a historical fact that's being minted in a cold blood as we speak: genocide shall be recognized as a valid means for resolving world issues. Consequences of this are obvious too: the UN shall make an entry into its free-fall orbit, only to make a hard landing on the same dumpster where the League of Nations had been buried earlier by their common mom England. And the Munich Accord that brought about World War II shall be studied by scholars of tomorrow as the "forerunner of the Dayton Accord that brought about World War III". Kids of XXIII century (under reign of Elisabeth III) shall be polishing their school projects titled "Why we didn't learn from mistakes that led to the WWII, to help us prevent WWIII"...

Alas, too late, as the masonic world shall at that same time be making preparations for WWIV, while making sure that those same kids become fresh corpses of tomorrow.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Dayton Two means Belfast Phase for Bosnia

After sentencing Ms. Hartmann (she was fined a few Euros, but, more importantly, also found guilty of -- justice!?), warmongers led by Carl Bildt (an obedient freemason who couldn't graduate from college) and Miroslav Lajčak have arrived in Sarajevo on 08 October, 2009. They are trying to carve up Bosnia, and finish their two-decade long effort of underground intelligence ops aimed at pushing the Drina geostrategic separator farther towards Rome.

As an overture to the planned grand finale (along with a crescendo), the writers of this libretto of death started setting a series of bloody incidents all over Bosnia, aimed at destabilizing the country. A 24-years old soccer fan of FC Sarajevo, Vedran Puljic was murdered execution-style two days ago by known intelligence operatives who had mixed with the police in what was supposed to be a controlled gathering of fan groups of two opposing soccer clubs before their game in Siroki Brijeg, FC Sarajevo (guests) and FC Siroki (hosts from the predominantly Catholic part of Southern Bosnia). Things didn't go that well for the intelligence operatives, as they actually assassinated a wrong guy -- while aiming and shooting (videos are posted all over the net) at the crowd which they assumed was composed exclusively of Muslims. But the executed young man was actually a Croat who supported FC Sarajevo! Thus the Bosnia's multicultural millennium is saving her once again.

With the situation amiss, the intelligence underground community composed of Serbian SDB operatives and collaborators from all ethnic groups, led by MI6, has naturally began expanding their theater of ops. So now Catholic churches in Sarajevo are being attacked, and insulting messages painted all over them. The theater was previously softened by an increase in ethnic incidents in the last month or so, where, for example, Croatian flags were set on fire by groups of Sarajevan soccer fans controlled by the SDA party (meaning: Serbian SDB). This all means that, in order to accomplish their geostrategic goal as mentioned above, the op analysts led by the aforementioned freemasons are doing their best to plant the seed of hatred once again amongst Bosnian Muslims and Catholics. There could hardly be a more unnatural conflict on the face of the Earth, than an animosity amongst these two groups because they are the one (Illyrian) people divided by misfortune of historic occupations (by Ottomans; by Habsburgs), always in the interest of English royals and their obsession with how to destabilize the Holy See. This time around, as initiated already a few decades ago, they are aiming to carve up Bosnia into three even funnier (and, obviously, less stable) puppet statelets than is the case presently with the Brussels Phase (Dayton Phase minus Bonn Authorities for enforcing the Dayton Agreement).

In other words, after they had officially recognized the genocidal puppet-creature called "Republika Srpska" as their equal partner (simply by virtue of moving on to the so-called Dayton Two phase, instead of reverting the situation to what was before the Bosnian Genocide established by the International Court of Justice), we are now being pushed by London away from the Dayton Phase, across the Brussels Phase, and on to the "Belfast Phase" for Bosnia. And the English know bloody well how to fire up an Ireland, don't they.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Sign Petition for Florence Hartmann

A true heroine of our age, Florence Hartmann deserves your attention and support. This brave lady has stood up against geostrategic powers. She simply acted in compliance with her consciousness, and out of her heart, which happened to be against imperialistic supremacy as well. Learn first-hand why we all still live in the darkness of the 19th century, regardless the glamour and colors of false hopes such as the UN. The strings are being pulled by English royals and their masonic puppeteers. Learn also what sorts of human scum wears judges' robes these days, judges who may be no better than those who once blindly served one chancellor of Germany and his "laws".

Learn and remember this: since vast majority of people are innately good at heart, every dictatorship needs appearance of legality, and therefore writes up own sets of laws and "laws" alike. It's up to us on the receiving end of their arrogant mercy, to distinguish the true from false "laws". The false ones are scarce but far more dangerous for a society than anything you could ever imagine... This petition is about your uprising against one and all of the "laws" of our World. More specifically yet, it's about liberating a potential political prisoner from the reach of a western albeit obviously antidemocratic "law".

Don't just wait for history to happen so you can "read all about it". Instead, write it yourself: sign the petition to save Florence Hartmann from an absolutely insane prosecution:

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Being evil is a family business

The Britain's Geostrategy of Controlled Chaos is a family business ran by a few families most notably the Salisbury's. Their confidants in the field, who see that the geostrategy is implemented on the decade-to-century scales, are also families; obviously this is the only way for the thing to go wholly unnoticed by the unsuspecting public. In Bosnia, these are the Sephardic families that were migrated from Spain to Bosnia in 1492, a few decades after the Ottomans annihilated the Bosnian Kingdom by leveling to the ground all of its 500 castles and towns, while leaving intact only the gravestones (so-called "stećci") to scare the visitor away from the No-man's-land. The Ottomans were paid for by London, who put them in throne in 1453 and had them immediately rush to Bosnia, thus conquering her in 1463. No other nation's statehood was annihilated by the Ottomans on their route to Bosnia and beyond, such as Macedonia, Serbia, Monte Negro, Hungary... Obviously, the goal of their campaign was to annihilate Bosnia. The immediate and long-term goals of this were to create permanent instability in the Pope's immediate vicinity, by inducing Bosnia's majority into all sorts of beliefs and systems, just not Catholicism -- England's deadliest enemy of all. Thus Bosnia was served all sorts of diverging baits, such as Bulgarian bogomilianism, Turkish Islam, Russian/Serb orthodoxy, then atheism, and now Bosnian majority (Illyrians-Muslims) are being Serbicized as we speak.

Immediately preceding the occupation and obliteration of Kingdom of Bosnia, were two massacres of practically entire Bosnian nobility, first one in Križevci in 1397 and then in Dobor in 1408. The Pope was tricked into giving his blessings to the Hungarian king who committed the massacre, by a faked "coronation" of the Bosnian king for the King of Serbia in 1377 (thus the Pope was made to believe that Bosnia was going to become an Orthodox province). Hungarian king belonged to the Order of the Knights of Dragon, an English geostrategist shield gathering duke of Norfolk de Mowbray, Austrian archduke Ernst, Serbian despot Stefan, Polish king Ladislav, Danish king Christopher etc., a shield that nowadays exists via different forms of "Freemasonry". The real (geostrategic) reason for the massacres however was to soften Bosnia militarily, as practically all Generals of the brave Bosnian army and navy were noblemen. Even after such measures, Bosnia didn't give in so easily to the Ottomans, mostly thanks to its rugged terrain and brave people, which prevented any other occupation in prior times (even the mighty Roman Empire took four long years to conquer Bosnia/Illyria proper, in what Roman historians regard as the toughest war that Roman Empire had ever undertaken, on par with the Punic wars).

So soon after the Ottoman annihilation of the country, educated Sephardic families replaced the slain Bosnian aristocracy, took Islam, and were now given the nobility posts and titles, such as 'Beys' and 'Agas'. They have been holding most important posts in Bosnia ever since, making sure that the English geostrategy is being always implemented. This of course is done at the extremely high cost: Bosnia always seems "strange", "unlikely", etc., a nation, with always the most ridiculous political solutions being implemented for Bosnia, while international conferences and foreign occupations shape her destiny geopolitically. These families run government (behind the scenes), but also quite openly run state hospitals, courts, national companies, etc. It's worth noting that, no matter the type of the regime, most of the time members of the same families run the show. Thus the same families, who gave ruling class and intellectuals under the Ottoman occupation, simply continued doing so under the Austrian occupation, as well as under the Serbia's monarchy, as well as in the Communism, as well as today in what mimics capitalism. At the same time, it's quite obvious to every Bosnian Muslim today that not only that Bosnia's aristocracy wannabes are the least faithful believers of all, but they also care about the national interests the least. Sounds familiar? Of course, the like surrogate-aristocracy is being positioned strategically around the globe, such as, say, the Saudi family. Same goes for the Ottoman family as well; they too were seated using London's gold. Just as they have been seating useful families around the world, the English have been also dethroning families loyal to the Pope. For this they use London's "freemasonry" dogs (a bunch of money grabbing morons) who stage revolutions, invent idiotic regimes such as communism, or play "sudden-billionaire-turned-democrat" roles.

Thus the matter of allowing for some 10000 of his citizens to be massacred in a well planned and organized genocide in Srebrenica, while stopping his own army to rush and rescue them, was easy to one traitor and a Sephardi by blood, Alija Izetbegović (the suffix 'begović' means he's rightfully a 'Bey'). Other examples include the 'Bey' families: Tihić, Lagumdžija, Gavrankapetanović, Filipović, etc. No matter what, the same families always give the nation's most prominent dignitaries and leaders, managers, judges, media influentials, etc., for full five centuries now. That's how the mechanism of the Britain's geostrategy is being successfully implemented: by imitating that of the Monarchy herself. It's all a family business, bloodiest one at that... Obviously, the only way to secure stability for Bosnia is to allow her to return to her roots. Ethnically, this means acknowledging that the so-called "Slavic origin" of the Western Balkans peoples was a fallacy created by England through grants to Vuk Karadžić (proven nowadays by the DNA studies that find the majority of that population to be of Illyrian descent, with virtually no one being of Slavic descent). Politically, this return to the roots means implementing the Spanish solution, and reinstating the last rightful dynasty in Bosnia.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Croatia's bridge on Britain's orders

Construction is Freemasonry's favorite cover-up (another one is visiting local hospitals and posing as a group Santa). To that effect, they even stole the famous Egyptian pyramids story, and are selling it as their own brand. (As I mentioned earlier, they were created only in 17th century, on English Crown's orders, to pose as a Trojan horse in continental Europe, which then extended around the Globe.) In imposing its naughty little game, the British government doesn't care much about what it is that its Horse preaches, or how many histories it makes up (such as: imprinting pyramid images on bank notes, inventing faked hopes like US, UN, etc.). All they want is to impress us, by creating as much and as shiny as possible, in any area imaginable from economy to art to engineering to science, no matter the cost and no matter the value... Most importantly, they use their "obsession" with construction so as to advance their philosophy as that "of those who spread the light", as if students must be lied to about questions we cannot answer, as if buildings must be oversized and stretch ever extendedly and overshadow anything humans make and outshine everything within the surroundings including the nature herself. Because you see, Freemasonry believes that it is them, the chosen few, who are the light, who are the nature, who are the god... And the rest of us? Well, every pyramids story requires slaves, remember? Now you may ask -- why am I telling you all this on a blog about Bosnia?
.

A 1919 secret document by the Foreign Office proves UK is aware for a long time of the highest value a Bosnian harbor would have. Britain is trying to prevent Bosnia's access to the International waters, and for this she hired services of her puppet -- the Croatia's government ran by HDZ.

See, the fake pyramids near Visoko aren't the only symbolism that Masonic creeps are trying to impose on Bosnia in order to demonstrate to Vatican that Bosnia will never exit the seventh circle of hell that London had pushed her into, some 1600 years ago, so as to keep the continental Europe permanently unstable and thus Vatican permanently miserable (of course, people tend to grow in numbers, so larger catastrophes are cooked up from time to time, such as fake -- nonetheless bloody -- World Wars, or, before those, Italian Wars, and so on). Thus, as their faked (Visoko) pyramids mass-hysteria as a diversion to the passing of faked Amendments to the faked Bosnia's faked Constitution have all failed in the B&H Parliament (in sweet April of 2006 -- the anniversary of the Bosnia's Grand Masonic Lodge resurrection), new construction was needed, new illusions were to be called for, and new morons were to be drafted into the ranks of fake light. Hence there came about the Pelješac Bridge story...

Now, that's not an ordinary bridge, mind you, for it's supposed to connect Croatia's coastline with Croatia's Pelješac peninsula. The official explanation is that, by building this bridge, Croatia connects Dubrovnik and Croatia's inlands via road, thus entirely abandoning the existing (single-)ferryboat line land-Pelješac. (The Bosnian coastline interrupts that of Croatia!) But there's something really odd about that: to build a bridge is the most expensive solution that the government of an overextended (credit-wise) Croatia has at its disposal! Other, far cheaper solutions include digging an undersea tunnel, or even cheaper yet -- purchasing more ferryboats... But No -- says Croatia's governments, not coincidentally ran by HDZ party -- an MI6 creation (the HDZ infamous counterpart is Bosnia's ruling SDA party -- both created by MI6 to serve England's geostrategic needs). Believe it or not: they're going to build this economic disaster of a bridge -- despite clear and loud opposition from the Bosnian Presidency, and clear and obvious maps by fmr. Yugoslavia Military Cartographic Institute showing the marine delineation [see image above]! And it won't be just any bridge, oh no. It will be built so as to impress, so as to overstretch, so as to overshadow and so as to outshine everything ever seen on both sides of the Adriatic Sea! Not less importantly, in doing so they are going to usurp not less that 1 km of Bosnia's territorial seawaters [see image above]. And that's where our story begins...
.
And where it ends, too. Namely, as it can be seen from the first, third and fourth image [Bosnia's territorial border shown pink; Top image: Croatia's territorial claim shown red if Bosnian islands of Great Školj and Little Školj (not shown) were to belong to Croatia], this "unexplainable" bridge is going to expel Bosnia from the marine nations club -- by simply crossing Bosnia's territorial waters for about 1 km. It is a well-established practice by the International Court to accept the right of exploitation, and all Croatia has to do in order to grab this little tiny piece of Adriatic Seacoast (to add to 98% it already claims -- without Yugoslavia succession delineation ever carried out!) is to build something... anything, really. The Pelješac bridge thus means: no access for Bosnia to the International waters, and no future for Bosnia's envisioned Neum-Klek harbor, so no bright days for a brave Illyrian nation that have been suffering for the past 2 millennia like no one else has ever suffered on this planet we call Earth. So as a new Constitution is being drafted (as we speak), a new diversion stage has been set up. Bring it on, maestro! When you think about it, all of this just so to provide peaceful dreams for one average nation we call England... Indeed, someplace, someday, may those dreams turn into a nightmare!

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Whooo let the Turks in (is letting the Russians in)?

By the beginning of 15th century, the English spies in the eastern parts of the Christendom became aware of the preparations to create the Russian Empire. As a strategic counter-measure, England encouraged and financed the Ottoman (family's) aspirations to the throne of Turkey, hoping to create a shielding counter-empire able of picking fights with Russia, for England. Indeed, after the Great Russian Empire was created (under the auspices of the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1453), that same year the English signaled the Ottomans to march on Constantinople. Indeed, the Ottomans captured with great savagery the capital of the dying Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, thus ending the Roman Empire as well as the Mid Ages...

Immediately after taking over Constantinople (renamed then to Istanbul) and enacting their own Ottoman Empire instead, the Ottoman Dynasty began returning favors to the English. There was no time to waste, so within a decade the Ottomans had rushed to Rome via the Balkans, conquering Bosnia in 1463. While annihilating the Bosnian Church, exterminating the Bosnian royalty, and burning down/leveling to the ground all traces of Bosnia's statehood such as more than 500 castles and churches (yet all 50,000 gravestones called stećci were left to this day as a scarecrow warning of a dead zone - a true No Man's Land!), the Ottomans at the same time had left Serbia intact; moreover, Turkey had paid for 99% of all Serbia's churches to be built. Thus Serbia was turned into a reliable ally for future Turkish attacks on the (then entirely Catholic) Europe. A strong geostrategic shield was thus put in place that was supposed to enable England sweet dreams for centuries to come. Most of the continental Europe indeed became a never-ending Warfield for geostrategic battles to be fought at, battles that will claim hundreds of millions of lives over the next five centuries, some of which however left England quite harmed as well...

Just like it cooperated with the Byzantine Empire in dragging the Bulgarian schismatic "Bogomilians" over to Bosnia in the 12th century (as soon as the Pope created Bosnia) to prevent Bosnians from identifying themselves with Catholicism and consequently pledging allegiance to the Holy See, England used the subsequent Turkish presence in the 16th century for the same purpose, via Islamization. In the same manner as in the previous cases, the Hapsburgs were given Bosnia in 1878, just as Russia is given Bosnia - today, as we speak. In order to keep them in check so they never fly off the handle (that is: start thinking they're greater than what's needed for England's needs), England exposes its subdued allies to all sorts of historical burdens. Thus the entire Turkish people "got" the stigma of Armenian Genocide, the Germans "got" the Jewish Holocaust, and now all Serbs "got" the Srebrenica Genocide (limited - as Serbs aren't to be disposed of just yet!) What the English are doing here is using the Roman Empire's strategy of divide and rule very efficiently, where one tribe/people is used against another, however always in a different era and under seemingly contradictory geopolitical circumstances. (The English are careful to impact the mankind's history only for so much, where at least one average lifetime passes between consecutive havocs, so that no one could relate the events or connect them with England).

The famous "majesty" of the England's global dominance stems entirely from the willingness of the English (more precisely: their symbiotic diplomats and financiers) to manipulate the weaknesses of foreign regimes and their key individuals via the infamous unholy B-trinity of the Mid Ages: Blackmail them, or Bribe them, or Burn them. The shiny glamour of the English "culture" holds on to indisputable mountains of starched blood of the innocent. This 4th wealthiest nation in the world - itself without (comparatively) any significant natural resources - has been using the best of its culprit minds (mostly Lords, then as nowadays, but today also some esteemed university professors) for the past 1600 years, that is, since the English bishops effectively separated from the Vatican. It's exclusively due to their culprit psyche, and not their qualities of any sort, that the English have become so unbelievably rich, so undeservedly powerful, and so unspeakably guilty. Alas, there is no Galactic Police to arrest them.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Bosnia-H%z$w&#a, what's in the name

Imagine a European country in which official history teaches for over a century that "no one knows how the country became" or cannot explain why the country was named the way it was named. In addition, all official discussions of that country's history since the Antiquity and on, carry compulsory labels that say: "very little known about", "not understood", "very little evidence" etc. Well, imagine no more, for that country is Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hmm, Bosnia and what? Oh, you thought I said Bosnia and Southern Bosnia... Because, doesn't "Herzegovina" stand for a southern region of the country, named after Duke (German: Herzog) Stjepan Kosača, a medieval landowner of that region's largest chunk?
.
You heard it correct!
.
Imagine now some "mysterious" force renaming your country, by adding to its millennium-old name also the name of one of its parts. Is nonsense like that possible in real life? For instance, if you live in France, this could sound something like "France and Corsica"... Whew! Did I just split your France apart, you ask? You bet I did!
.
Now lets go back to year 1853 for a moment.
.
Bosnia (officially called so until 1853) is under the Ottoman occupation. Totally out-of-the-blue, the occupationist administration renames the country to "Bosnia and Herzegovina". Around that time, Croatia, then under occupation by the Austria-Hungarian Empire under the Habsburg family (another ally of the English royals, besides the Ottoman family), also gets renamed to "Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia". Twenty five years later, equally "mysteriously", Bosnia changes hands from the Ottoman to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, keeping her name. While Croatia managed to get rid of her ridiculous name soon after she got it, 150+ years on and Bosnia still has her same old ridiculous name... (I say ridiculous because it's even less logical than the above example: unlike Corsica, Herzegovina is a mere geographical term without known physical borders!)
.
The fact that Croatia has managed to get out of the Twilight Zone so fast, and the fact that a veil of secrecy still surrounds the renaming of the two countries (official histories in Bosnia and Croatia virtually don't refer to this crucial event), point at one possible explanation: the renaming was done with oberpolitics (geostrategy) in mind, or, more precisely still, for the purpose of colonization in this case. Not only that Bosnia today is still called "Bosnia and Herzegovina", but she recently (in Dayton in 1995) got stripped of her "Republic" status too, making it quite obvious that Bosnia is the last unofficial colony in the world. If you recall those school lessons on safari-Africa, in colonies you can kill or rape or destroy or loot pretty much anything that moves or holds any value, without ever having to pay a price. Which brings us to the issue of "Republika Srpska", a genocidal creature also recently (in Dayton 1995) placed on the map of Europe, by that same Europe led by English puppets since 17th century...
.
After the world got rid of South African apartheid regime, Bosnia with its colonial status remains the last shameful spot of the world. Alernatively, it could also be that Bosnia is the first shameful spot of the world of tomorrow - under the New World Order.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Britain - complicit to genocide, TWICE!

xx xxxxxxxxx, xxxx
.
Exercising her free will and the rights reserved as stated in the earlier proceedings in this case [see below]; Following the 14 years of delays under Britain-instated duress in the Bosnia v. Serbia case; Unsatisfied with the obviously unjust verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case by the International Court in Hague presided by an English woman; the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is hereby suing the United Kingdom and other states previously implicated as stated in the above, for GENOCIDE.
.
The fact that the United Kingdom was twice complicit to genocide proves not just her complicity any more, but the act of genocide itself. The specific crimes of genocide that the United Kingdom has committed are as follows:

1. in 1992, she lead a group of UN-member nations that instated arms embargo to fmr. Yugoslav republics. The arms embargo had de facto affected only the Government of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, preventing her using her rights for self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter that states: "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security."

2. in 1995, she actively opposed military intervention by the UN and NATO that would enforce protection of the UN "safe zone" in Srebrenica. This resulted in deaths of over 8,000 unarmed men, women and children.

3. in 1995-1996, she and her allies imposed the so-called "Dayton Peace Accord" that was designed in a way so to create an "impossible regime" by recognizing the results of aggression and genocide, with the de facto effect of further exhausting the civilian population of the plaintiff, with the genocidal goal of depopulating the country of its major ethnic group.

4. in 2006, she and her allies threatened for three days and two nights the MP's of the Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina who were in a permanent marathon session, that they must finally ratify the Dayton Peace Accord by amending it, but the Parliament has refused to do so.

5. in 2006, she arranged untimely and insufficiently documented death of Serbia's fmr. President Slobodan Milošević in his prison cell at the War Tribunal for fmr. Yugoslavia, thus preventing his deposition and case to become the crucial parts of the verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case before the International Court.

6. in 2007-2008, during the Kosovo second crisis, and following the Bosnia's general elections of November 2006 in which the patriotic MP's and their parties won the popular vote, she and her allies nevertheless continued pressuring the Bosnian authorities while forcing them to ratify the never-ratified and never-officially-translated Dayton Peace Accord and thereby enable full international recognition of the genocidal state so-called "Republika Srpska".

7. at least between 1991-2007, she and her allies designed and committed acts of subversive actions, illegal intelligence operations, parallel public-hoax operations ("Bosnian pyramids" project designed to divert public attention in a critical moment), bribe of local officials, media control/oppression, judiciary and legislative subversions, prevention of Bosnia's access to international waters, illegal export of timber and minerals, unlawful arrests, kidnapping of Bosnian citizens, as well as other illicit activities, in order to achieve her long-term so-called strategic goals in the Balkans.

8. in 2007, she imposed her geostrategic will upon the international order by having her citizen who presided the Bosnia v. Serbia case run the process in a way that, as well as swing the vote of other judges and justices in the direction that, benefits her strategic goals in the Balkans. One of such strategic goals is the part of the verdict that claims Serbia owes no damages to the plaintiff despite the factual (documented) war damages exceeding USD 100 billion, which does not include punitive damages for at least 100,000 deaths, more than half a million wounded, and more than 2 million displaced individuals, all this despite the documented presence and decisive involvement of the formal Serbian military forces on the plaintiff's territory and aquatory during 1992-1995. This clearly implicates her as not only an accomplice in the Bosnian genocide (1992-1995) any more, but now it exposes her as a UN-member state that has been willingly committing various acts of genocide against the people of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

9. by committing the above crimes, she placed herself above the international law, and purposely broke numerous international conventions to which she herself officially abides.

10. for committing the above crimes, the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is going to seek material and other types of reparations from the United Kingdom. The plaintiff reserves the right to seek reparations for damages dated prior to 1991, based on the available documentation from her earlier imperial involvements in Bosnia of centuries ago.

.
.
******************************

CASE HISTORY
.
.
.
STATEMENT OF INTENTION BY THE REPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA TO INSTITUTE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
.
15 November, 1993
.

Today, the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina hereby states our solemn intention to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom before the International Court of Justice for violating the terms of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; of the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; and of the other sources of general international law set forth in Article 38 of the World Court's Statute. We have already issued formal instructions to that effect to our Attorneys-of-Record before the World Court. They are currently drafting an Application and a Request for Provisional Measures against the United Kingdom. We have instructed our lawyers to file these papers with the World Court as soon as physically possible. In the meantime, we hereby reserve all of our international legal rights against the United Kingdom:
.
I. Both the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Kingdom are contracting parties to the 1948 Genocide Convention.


Article IX
of the Genocide Convention:
Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfillment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of State for genocide or for any of the other acts enumerated in article III, shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.
.
We will sue the United Kingdom for violating the following provisions of the Genocide Convention, inter alia:
First, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has failed in their affirmative obligation and refused "to prevent" genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of Article I of the Genocide Convention, which provides as follows:"The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in the time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish." Second, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has illegally imposed and maintained an arms embargo upon the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51 while acting in its capacity as a Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council. The United Kingdom has also aided and abetted the ongoing genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina by actively opposing all of the efforts by other States to "lift" this illegal arms embargo. For these reasons, we will charge that the United Kingdom has violated Article III, paragraph (e) of the Genocide Convention that expressly prohibits "complicity in genocide." The legal basis for this charge has been developed at length by Judge ad hoc Elihu Lauterpacht in his Separate Opinion attached to the World Court's Order of 13 September 1993 in the Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), which is currently pending. Finally, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom is both jointly and severally liable for all of the harm that has been inflicted upon the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina because the United Kingdom is an aider and abettor to genocide under the Genocide Convention and international criminal law.
.

In drafting these legal pleadings for the World Court, and during the course of the subsequent proceedings, our lawyers will also name and implicate other Member States of the U.N. Security Council that have supported this illegal arms embargo in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51, as aiders and abettors to genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We will not sue these other States at this time.
. We also serve notice upon all of the more than 100 Contracting Parties to the Genocide Convention that each and every one of them has a solemn legal and moral obligation "to prevent" the commission of genocide in and against the People and State of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as required by Article I.
.
.

II. Both the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Kingdom are also contracting parties to the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Article 22 thereof provides as follows:
.
Article 22
Any dispute between two or more States Parties over the interpretation or application of this Convention, which is not settled by negotiation or by the procedures expressly provided for in this Convention, shall at the request of any of the parties to the dispute be referred to the International Court of Justice for decision, unless the disputants agree to another mode of settlement.
.
The United Kingdom has promoted options, ostensibly as solutions to the aggression against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, that are inconsistent with the terms of this treaty.
.
****
.
This Statement was circulated to all Members of the United Nations Organization, and will also be filed with the International Court of Justice.
.
Professor Francis A. Boyle
Law Building 504
E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, Ill.
61820


****************************

.
3 January 1994

.
Professor Boyle ("the author") called the Registrar of the International Court of Justice in order to make three basic Points to him for transmission to the Judges of the World Court:
.
1. The Bosnian decision to withdraw the lawsuit against the United Kingdom was made under duress, threats, and coercion perpetrated by the British government and the governments of several other European states upon the highest level officials of the Bosnian government in Geneva, London, and Sarajevo. Therefore the so-called agreement to withdraw the lawsuit against Britain was void ab initio. I reserved the right of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to denounce this agreement at any time and to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom in accordance with the Statement of 15 November 1993.
.
2. The British government demanded that the author be fired as the General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Court. The British government knew full well that the author was the one responsible for the Bosnian strategy at the World Court, and especially for the recommendation to sue Britain.
.
3. Toward the end of conversation with the Registrar on 3 January 1994, the author made an oral Request that the World Court indicate provisional measures proprio motu in order to protect the People and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina from extermination and annihilation by the rump Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia. He pointed out to the Registrar that this oral Request was in accordance with the terms of the written Request for provisional measures proprio motu in advance that was already set forth in Bosnia's Second Request for Provisional Measures of 27 July 1993. The Registrar informed him that the Court was paying close attention to the situation in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Pursuant to Point 2, above, the author was relieved of his responsibilities as General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the World Court on 12 January 1994.

Sunday, September 9, 2007

GEOSTRATEGY, what's in the word

"Geostrategy, a subfield of geopolitics, is a type of foreign policy guided principally by geographical factors as they inform, constrain, or affect political and military planning. As with all strategies, geostrategy is concerned with matching means to ends—in this case, a country's resources (whether they are limited or extensive) with its geopolitical objectives (which can be local, regional, or global). According to Gray and Sloan, geography is "the mother of strategy." Geostrategists, as distinct from geopoliticians, advocate proactive strategies, and approach geopolitics from a nationalist point-of-view. As with all political theories, geostrategies are relevant principally to the context in which they were devised: the nationality of the strategist, the strength of his or her country's resources, the scope of their country's goals, the political geography of the time period, and the technological factors that affect military, political, economic, and cultural engagement." (Wikipedia)
.
Isn't it remarkable indeed that GEOSTRATEGY, a word so important and so frequently cited (Google returns: 100,000) cannot be found in a high-esteemed encyclopedia such as the most famous and most praised one of them all - the Britannica? Things omitted can indeed matter more than things considered. Thus is the case with the Britannica that, to make things even weirder, does report on strategy - from the battlefield to the national level - but stops short of reporting on geostrategy as the "strategy of all strategies". It's with this thought in mind that I write this blog. My goal is to expose those geostrategies that are the culprit behind the millennial suffering of the Bosnian people.
.
I started one month ago today, with a curious case of the "Bosnian pyramids" and the surprising involvement of Russia's geostrategist Khavroshkin [See my other blog http://omerbashich.blogspot.com/] Unfortunately, as it turned out by now, not only that the case isn't about archaeology at all, but it isn't about the corruption of Bosnian officials either; the two (too obvious) views held mostly by people who possess admirable education, but in a field unrelated to geostrategy.
.