Saturday, January 30, 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Omerbashich Dynasty - dinastija Omerbasic
I finally had time to compile a royal family tree (kraljevsko porodično stablo, in Bosnian) of the Omerbašić dynasty. For those who don't know, members of all 200-some Omerbashich families (Anglicized spelling; the pro-Byzantium spelling is Omerbašić; see below for a Bosnian version of the tree) represent the successor dynasty to the Bosnian and Serbian thrones, and possibly to the throne of England (Britain) as well. We are the direct (paternal) descendants of the first Ban and Viceroy of Bosnia, Boril Borić (also: Borič), and the heirs apparent to the extinguished House of Kotromanić. Ban Borič was the Bosnia's founding father - a Black Knight (Templar) sent after the Second Crusade by the Pope in 1154 to create a fender-state at the border between the Western and the Byzantine Empires, newly revived due to the Church Schism and for the first time after the collapse of the Roman Empire five centuries earlier. But Borič could also be young Eustace IV, the heir apparent to the throne of England, who was known for his savagery and battlefield mercilessness. The Pope refused to appoint him as the king of England in 1152, stating his evilness as an excuse, which enabled the Rome to give the throne of England to the Church's allies, the French first dynasty of Anjou. The fact that England at one time in its history was so close to collapse just because they had only one heir apparent (after his brother was killed, and family was scarce), will become the main motivation behind the English monarchs frenetically intermarrying other royal Houses around Europe, so that nowadays there are 2000 individuals in the Line of Succession to the British throne -- the world's record of all times. As for the Count Eustace IV, he "mysteriously" disappeared in 1153, aged 25. He could have been ousted as the only heir to the throne of England by the Church, and as part of his punishment sent off to Bosnia as the then-easternmost border of the Western Christendom, to utilize his alleged savagery in fighting against the Byzantine. This could be true because his coat of arms (pictured right), discovered in 2003, obviously is that of a Royal (barred helmet, purple ostrich feathers) Black Knight, but with heraldic symbols of disgrace (such as bend sinister and a rat). If so, Omerbašićs hold a rightful claim for the heir apparent to the throne of England (Britain), taking priority over any subsequent English Houses' claims. The very surname Borič is unusual, and it stems from Breuci, the name of the large Illyrian tribe that inhabitted the area and was known for its bravery in the Third Illyrian War it waged against the Rome in 6 A.D.
Soon after the Pope urged the Hungarian monarch to name Borič to the throne of Bosnia, the Normans (an English tribe) invaded Italy, forcing the Pope to enter into alliance with the only available military power around -- the Byzantines. But the Byzantines had already partnered with the English, after the English regained in 1154 their stability (outsmarting the Pope by using his French to stabilize England for the English), which they had previously lost to a grave anarchy dealt to them by the Church and which devastated England for decades. Because the same Pope who had sent Borič to found a new state Bosnia, has now sided with the Byzantines in exchange for their help in saving his papacy from the invading Normans, the Holy See officially lost interest in East European affairs. The Byzantines then took advantage of this, and bribed the uncles of the child-King of Hungary, who hire Hungarian mercenaries Gutkeleds to depose Borič, in 1163. The Byzantines' intention was to seat their patsy instead. However, a grave instability in Rome and the fights over the right for papacy (resulting in two Antipopes named by the Holy Roman Emperor Barbarossa without consent from the Church which elected their own Pope, in exile), halted them for fifteen years. As those internal problems of Rome's were losing up, with the help of the Church-chosen new Pope and in exchange for the Byzantine's support in his fighting Barbarossa, the Byzantines assassinate the now adult King of Hungary (former child-King), at age 23, after he took powers back from his corrupt uncles and started fighting the Byzantines naively (as a good Catholic kid unaware of the Pope's bigger worries than just saving the souls). The Byzantines then install his brother who was raised at their court, as the King of Hungary, and supply him with enormous quantities of gold. This made him one of the richest monarchs of Europe, which in turn made the Church-elected Pope again influential as he crowned one powerful King, thus fending off Barbarossa who allows the new Pope to return to Rome in 1179. The new Hungarian patsy of the Byzantine Empire then installs in 1180 as a new Ban of Bosnia one traitor -- an 18-year old soldier named Kulin, who then proclaims a new pro-Byzantine (anti-Church) dynasty, the House of Kulinić. As one sappy local myth would have it, the times of Ban Kulin were amongst most peaceful in Bosnia's history. It was nothing but treason, surrender, a sort of what goes on today too, because the only thing that Kulin brought to Bosnia was the Bulgarian sect so-called Bogomils, so that the Bosnians be diverted from the Catholic faith. This delusion will cost them their freedom of mind for the next half millennium, as it will soon be replaced by Islam brought in by the Ottomans who adjusted Islamic symbolics (added the Crescent) so to capture the hearts of Bosnians whose symbol of adoration since the Illyrian Kingdom and through the Bogomils, was precisely the Crescent.
Royal Knight Borič was the common paternal ancestor to all other Bosnian dynasties: Boričević, Kotromanić, and Berislavić. But in the 15th century the Pope's then-already worst nightmare a.k.a. the English royals enlisted help of their buddies-to-become a.k.a. the Ottoman dynasty. This was to add to the "fine" company made of rulers of Hungary, Serbia and other European lands, who by then already turned against the Holy See, thus gathered in the Order of the Dragon that continues its high antipapal activities to this day. For example, the Order had furnished the Ottomans with tons of gold as well as secret 23 m long supercannons to enable the Turks to savagely capture Constantinople, in 1453. In return, the Ottomans immediately marched on Rome to conquer it. On their way, they annihilated Bosnia's statehood, killing Bosnia's last crowned King Tomašević in 1463, and leveling to the ground all of its 500 castles. No other country received such a savage treatment by the Ottomans, as Bosnia did... It was all playing well for the Order of the Dragon. It had previously softened the field for the Turks: its founder King Sigismund of Hungary was a madman who led in 1408 the massacre at Dobor (see post of 9 April, 2009), of most of Bosnia's nobility (over 200 families) including his wife's cousins. This also removed most of Bosnia's Generals too, so crucial for the country's defense. (The Order was also fundamentally attacking the Church: by sponsoring one Jan Hus; and after the Church defended itself from Hus, the Order then sponsored one Martin Luther, and kept so on and on, subverting the Church in the following centuries and decimating it into hundreds of fractions, which continues to this day.) Bosnia's nobility resisted valiantly long after 1463, so that Turkey was able to establish its first administration, called Eyalet of Bosnia, only in 1527. The Sultan sent his Admiral to Spain with the Emperial Ship to drag over elite Sephardic Jews who were elite-for-pay. They took Islam and were given the invented nobility titles such as "Beys" and "Aghas". They thus became the most powerful capos of the Balkans for England's interests and they remain such to this day. They rule Bosnia as we speak, and are easily recognized by their last names' suffixes of begić, begović, agić, agović, etc. Most prominent amongst these today are Izetbegovićs, Tihićs, Gavrankapetanovićs...
The Ottomans believed that by executing the last crowned ruler of Bosnia King Tomašević, in 1463, they were also eradicating the Bosnia's ruling bloodline. But soon the Ottomans discovered in battlefield that the Bosnia's ruling bloodline was well and kicking (thank you very much). Brave brothers Generals Franjo and Ivaniš Berislavić, direct descendants of Ban Borič, led the fierce resistence from north and west. When the Turks became too strong in Bosnia, Ivaniš's son Stjepan tried to trick them by posing as their tactical but not strategic ally. Namely, he would not convert to Islam, not even under the death threat by Gazi-Husref Bey the commander of the occupying forces and Sultan's grandson (who therefore knew how paramount it was to eradicate the ruling bloodline in a Christendom country). Stjepan was the first one to join the Turks in arms, to the amazement of other Catholic nobility. But it didn't take long for the Ottomans to realize that subduing Bosnia by decapitating its last crowned King Tomašević or by taking away all of Queen Katarina's children to Turkey to raise them Muslim did not end the bloodline. Namely, the first Kotromanić, Prijezda I, who was a Berislavić and who ended the pale Kulinić Dynasty while starting his own House of Kotromanić (named after his ancestor and Borič's adversary German mercenary Kotroman), was at the same time a direct descendant of Ban Borič. And so was Stjepan too, as the leading Berislavić. So after the sad ending of the Kotromanićs, Stjepan Berislavić remained the King Apparent of Bosnia (paternally) and Despot-in-exile of Serbia (matrilineally). In order to finish up what they had started by murdering King Tomašević and kidnapping child heirs apparent, the Turks execute Stjepan Berislavić too, in 1535 at age 33.
at
15:21
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Nature of mud
Who hasn't heard of a journal called "Nature". Check out any media that reports science news, and it jumps at you right away: Nature says... Occasionally, its "counterpart", called "Science", fills in when Nature is away on vacation, as they are roomies living under the same roof belonging to the same landlord. Every West must have its East, every Left must have its Right, every Coke must have its Pepsi. And that's that, in a faked reality-show at least. But how do 'science news', which in most cases are minted under the pens of Nature editors, end up displayed on your screen, and deep-drilled inside your eyes and ears? The shortest answer is: via world's largest news agencies of course, Reuters or AP, as well as large news mills such as CNN or BBC. Coincidentally, they all belong to the same group of bankers and royals, called The Bilderberg groupies, who, for over a millennium and under various names and pretexts, desire to rule the world (scientifically extrapolating -- probably longer and deeper than what is known!).When Climategate erupted last month, and literally knocked down the Copenhagen and all future gatherings of the sort, thin air traders Al Gore and Michael Mann became a heavy burden for Nature. Its pillars for the past decade, just like Einstein was for the past century, Gore and Mann have incidentally created the first circumstantial evidence in history, if by shear repetition, of a clear-cut conspiracy aimed at capping of our minds and keeping them so tightly shut for ever, and ever, and ever. So Nature seems to have promptly dumped the duo; they are nowhere to be seen: Gore confined to the blogosphere, and Mann down-downgraded to scripting editorials for bankrupt newspapers. After years of living in denial and refusing to believe in man-made climate change, I admit I finally succumbed to the overwhelming bastardism of the duo, of Nature, and of their global wannabe-government The Bilderbergs, so from now on I believe in -- Mann-made climate change.
But the mud that Nature is, was obvious for quite some time to those who wanted to see, i.e. who didn't need a scandal of the Climategate caliber. After killing a few papers from "the world's leading scientific journal", I was faced with a brutal reality that Nature might be a political agenda and nothing more. Soon after, I found out that its senior editor named Henry Gee was a fulltime biggot, racist, and openly a Muslim hater (not that I'm religious). After reporting his racism to some trillionaire from Germany who actually owns Nature, Gee was disciplined by a warning, while his fascist blog was promptly deleted by the service provider. Dr. Gee however is still making crucial decisions at Nature, as according to editor-in-chief, "they have been buddies for ten years". Now, that's a sort of a criterion to bow to! But the gallery of characters of Mann and Gee type is resourceful indeed. While learning more and more about Nature, I came across a geophysics editor who, on a closer look, greenlights mostly papers written by his former Department's alumni. Now, that's another criterion to bow to, isn't it. Not to mention Nature's Web Site where dirty tricks (resembling those seen at Wikipedia) are used to mute any real debate: by locking of comment fields when debate becomes to-the-point, by mocking of posts that touch on real debate issues, by deleting entire recent pages after caching them with false summary and then redirecting, etc. Not to mention their support for eugenics (quasi-scientific genocide) giving room to darkest ideology such as http://www.optimumpopulation.org/ Institute that recommends "downsizing" of the world population, in such a detailed and sickening manner that makes Josef Mengele look like a novice (check out their Tables detailing each country's proposed "human cleansing": declaring for example that 3 out of 4 million Bosnians are "surplus", just like they claim 3-5 billion people overall are). Not to mention a military-linked reviewer of Nature, who wrote to me once that "everybody knows that most Nature papers are wrong, anyway"...
at
20:50
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Belfast Phase is an excuse to end Bosnia
at
01:21
Friday, October 9, 2009
Dayton Two means Belfast Phase for Bosnia
With the situation amiss, the intelligence underground community composed of Serbian SDB operatives and collaborators from all ethnic groups, led by MI6, has naturally began expanding their theater of ops. So now Catholic churches in Sarajevo are being attacked, and insulting messages painted all over them. The theater was previously softened by an increase in ethnic incidents in the last month or so, where, for example, Croatian flags were set on fire by groups of Sarajevan soccer fans controlled by the SDA party (meaning: Serbian SDB). This all means that, in order to accomplish their geostrategic goal as mentioned above, the op analysts led by the aforementioned freemasons are doing their best to plant the seed of hatred once again amongst Bosnian Muslims and Catholics. There could hardly be a more unnatural conflict on the face of the Earth, than an animosity amongst these two groups because they are the one (Illyrian) people divided by misfortune of historic occupations (by Ottomans; by Habsburgs), always in the interest of English royals and their obsession with how to destabilize the Holy See. This time around, as initiated already a few decades ago, they are aiming to carve up Bosnia into three even funnier (and, obviously, less stable) puppet statelets than is the case presently with the Brussels Phase (Dayton Phase minus Bonn Authorities for enforcing the Dayton Agreement).
In other words, after they had officially recognized the genocidal puppet-creature called "Republika Srpska" as their equal partner (simply by virtue of moving on to the so-called Dayton Two phase, instead of reverting the situation to what was before the Bosnian Genocide established by the International Court of Justice), we are now being pushed by London away from the Dayton Phase, across the Brussels Phase, and on to the "Belfast Phase" for Bosnia. And the English know bloody well how to fire up an Ireland, don't they.
at
02:25
Friday, June 26, 2009
Sign Petition for Florence Hartmann
A true heroine of our age, Florence Hartmann deserves your attention and support. This brave lady has stood up against geostrategic powers. She simply acted in compliance with her consciousness, and out of her heart, which happened to be against imperialistic supremacy as well. Learn first-hand why we all still live in the darkness of the 19th century, regardless the glamour and colors of false hopes such as the UN. The strings are being pulled by English royals and their masonic puppeteers. Learn also what sorts of human scum wears judges' robes these days, judges who may be no better than those who once blindly served one chancellor of Germany and his "laws".
at
22:34
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Being evil is a family business
Immediately preceding the occupation and obliteration of Kingdom of Bosnia, were two massacres of practically entire Bosnian nobility, first one in Križevci in 1397 and then in Dobor in 1408. The Pope was tricked into giving his blessings to the Hungarian king who committed the massacre, by a faked "coronation" of the Bosnian king for the King of Serbia in 1377 (thus the Pope was made to believe that Bosnia was going to become an Orthodox province). Hungarian king belonged to the Order of the Knights of Dragon, an English geostrategist shield gathering duke of Norfolk de Mowbray, Austrian archduke Ernst, Serbian despot Stefan, Polish king Ladislav, Danish king Christopher etc., a shield that nowadays exists via different forms of "Freemasonry". The real (geostrategic) reason for the massacres however was to soften Bosnia militarily, as practically all Generals of the brave Bosnian army and navy were noblemen. Even after such measures, Bosnia didn't give in so easily to the Ottomans, mostly thanks to its rugged terrain and brave people, which prevented any other occupation in prior times (even the mighty Roman Empire took four long years to conquer Bosnia/Illyria proper, in what Roman historians regard as the toughest war that Roman Empire had ever undertaken, on par with the Punic wars).
So soon after the Ottoman annihilation of the country, educated Sephardic families replaced the slain Bosnian aristocracy, took Islam, and were now given the nobility posts and titles, such as 'Beys' and 'Agas'. They have been holding most important posts in Bosnia ever since, making sure that the English geostrategy is being always implemented. This of course is done at the extremely high cost: Bosnia always seems "strange", "unlikely", etc., a nation, with always the most ridiculous political solutions being implemented for Bosnia, while international conferences and foreign occupations shape her destiny geopolitically. These families run government (behind the scenes), but also quite openly run state hospitals, courts, national companies, etc. It's worth noting that, no matter the type of the regime, most of the time members of the same families run the show. Thus the same families, who gave ruling class and intellectuals under the Ottoman occupation, simply continued doing so under the Austrian occupation, as well as under the Serbia's monarchy, as well as in the Communism, as well as today in what mimics capitalism. At the same time, it's quite obvious to every Bosnian Muslim today that not only that Bosnia's aristocracy wannabes are the least faithful believers of all, but they also care about the national interests the least. Sounds familiar? Of course, the like surrogate-aristocracy is being positioned strategically around the globe, such as, say, the Saudi family. Same goes for the Ottoman family as well; they too were seated using London's gold. Just as they have been seating useful families around the world, the English have been also dethroning families loyal to the Pope. For this they use London's "freemasonry" dogs (a bunch of money grabbing morons) who stage revolutions, invent idiotic regimes such as communism, or play "sudden-billionaire-turned-democrat" roles.
Thus the matter of allowing for some 10000 of his citizens to be massacred in a well planned and organized genocide in Srebrenica, while stopping his own army to rush and rescue them, was easy to one traitor and a Sephardi by blood, Alija Izetbegović (the suffix 'begović' means he's rightfully a 'Bey'). Other examples include the 'Bey' families: Tihić, Lagumdžija, Gavrankapetanović, Filipović, etc. No matter what, the same families always give the nation's most prominent dignitaries and leaders, managers, judges, media influentials, etc., for full five centuries now. That's how the mechanism of the Britain's geostrategy is being successfully implemented: by imitating that of the Monarchy herself. It's all a family business, bloodiest one at that... Obviously, the only way to secure stability for Bosnia is to allow her to return to her roots. Ethnically, this means acknowledging that the so-called "Slavic origin" of the Western Balkans peoples was a fallacy created by England through grants to Vuk Karadžić (proven nowadays by the DNA studies that find the majority of that population to be of Illyrian descent, with virtually no one being of Slavic descent). Politically, this return to the roots means implementing the Spanish solution, and reinstating the last rightful dynasty in Bosnia.
at
16:14
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Croatia's bridge on Britain's orders
Construction is Freemasonry's favorite cover-up (another one is visiting local hospitals and posing as a group Santa). To that effect, they even stole the famous Egyptian pyramids story, and are selling it as their own brand. (As I mentioned earlier, they were created only in 17th century, on English Crown's orders, to pose as a Trojan horse in continental Europe, which then extended around the Globe.) In imposing its naughty little game, the British government doesn't care much about what it is that its Horse preaches, or how many histories it makes up (such as: imprinting pyramid images on bank notes, inventing faked hopes like US, UN, etc.). All they want is to impress us, by creating as much and as shiny as possible, in any area imaginable from economy to art to engineering to science, no matter the cost and no matter the value... Most importantly, they use their "obsession" with construction so as to advance their philosophy as that "of those who spread the light", as if students must be lied to about questions we cannot answer, as if buildings must be oversized and stretch ever extendedly and overshadow anything humans make and outshine everything within the surroundings including the nature herself. Because you see, Freemasonry believes that it is them, the chosen few, who are the light, who are the nature, who are the god... And the rest of us? Well, every pyramids story requires slaves, remember? Now you may ask -- why am I telling you all this on a blog about Bosnia?.
A 1919 secret document by the Foreign Office proves UK is aware for a long time of the highest value a Bosnian harbor would have. Britain is trying to prevent Bosnia's access to the International waters, and for this she hired services of her puppet -- the Croatia's government ran by HDZ.
See, the fake pyramids near Visoko aren't the only symbolism that Masonic creeps are trying to impose on Bosnia in order to demonstrate to Vatican that Bosnia will never exit the seventh circle of hell that London had pushed her into, some 1600 years ago, so as to keep the continental Europe permanently unstable and thus Vatican permanently miserable (of course, people tend to grow in numbers, so larger catastrophes are cooked up from time to time, such as fake -- nonetheless bloody -- World Wars, or, before those, Italian Wars, and so on). Thus, as their faked (Visoko) pyramids mass-hysteria as a diversion to the passing of faked Amendments to the faked Bosnia's faked Constitution have all failed in the B&H Parliament (in sweet April of 2006 -- the anniversary of the Bosnia's Grand Masonic Lodge resurrection), new construction was needed, new illusions were to be called for, and new morons were to be drafted into the ranks of fake light. Hence there came about the Pelješac Bridge story...
Now, that's not an ordinary bridge, mind you, for it's supposed to connect Croatia's coastline with Croatia's Pelješac peninsula. The official explanation is that, by building this bridge, Croatia connects Dubrovnik and Croatia's inlands via road, thus entirely abandoning the existing (single-)ferryboat line land-Pelješac. (The Bosnian coastline interrupts that of Croatia!) But there's something really odd about that: to build a bridge is the most expensive solution that the government of an overextended (credit-wise) Croatia has at its disposal! Other, far cheaper solutions include digging an undersea tunnel, or even cheaper yet -- purchasing more ferryboats... But No -- says Croatia's governments, not coincidentally ran by HDZ party -- an MI6 creation (the HDZ infamous counterpart is Bosnia's ruling SDA party -- both created by MI6 to serve England's geostrategic needs). Believe it or not: they're going to build this economic disaster of a bridge -- despite clear and loud opposition from the Bosnian Presidency, and clear and obvious maps by fmr. Yugoslavia Military Cartographic Institute showing the marine delineation [see image above]! And it won't be just any bridge, oh no. It will be built so as to impress, so as to overstretch, so as to overshadow and so as to outshine everything ever seen on both sides of the Adriatic Sea! Not less importantly, in doing so they are going to usurp not less that 1 km of Bosnia's territorial seawaters [see image above]. And that's where our story begins...
And where it ends, too. Namely, as it can be seen from the first, third and fourth image [Bosnia's territorial border shown pink; Top image: Croatia's territorial claim shown red if Bosnian islands of Great Školj and Little Školj (not shown) were to belong to Croatia], this "unexplainable" bridge is going to expel Bosnia from the marine nations club -- by simply crossing Bosnia's territorial waters for about 1 km. It is a well-established practice by the International Court to accept the right of exploitation, and all Croatia has to do in order to grab this little tiny piece of Adriatic Seacoast (to add to 98% it already claims -- without Yugoslavia succession delineation ever carried out!) is to build something... anything, really. The Pelješac bridge thus means: no access for Bosnia to the International waters, and no future for Bosnia's envisioned Neum-Klek harbor, so no bright days for a brave Illyrian nation that have been suffering for the past 2 millennia like no one else has ever suffered on this planet we call Earth. So as a new Constitution is being drafted (as we speak), a new diversion stage has been set up. Bring it on, maestro! When you think about it, all of this just so to provide peaceful dreams for one average nation we call England... Indeed, someplace, someday, may those dreams turn into a nightmare!
at
22:36
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Whooo let the Turks in (is letting the Russians in)?
By the beginning of 15th century, the English spies in the eastern parts of the Christendom became aware of the preparations to create the Russian Empire. As a strategic counter-measure, England encouraged and financed the Ottoman (family's) aspirations to the throne of Turkey, hoping to create a shielding counter-empire able of picking fights with Russia, for England. Indeed, after the Great Russian Empire was created (under the auspices of the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1453), that same year the English signaled the Ottomans to march on Constantinople. Indeed, the Ottomans captured with great savagery the capital of the dying Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, thus ending the Roman Empire as well as the Mid Ages...
Immediately after taking over Constantinople (renamed then to Istanbul) and enacting their own Ottoman Empire instead, the Ottoman Dynasty began returning favors to the English. There was no time to waste, so within a decade the Ottomans had rushed to Rome via the Balkans, conquering Bosnia in 1463. While annihilating the Bosnian Church, exterminating the Bosnian royalty, and burning down/leveling to the ground all traces of Bosnia's statehood such as more than 500 castles and churches (yet all 50,000 gravestones called stećci were left to this day as a scarecrow warning of a dead zone - a true No Man's Land!), the Ottomans at the same time had left Serbia intact; moreover, Turkey had paid for 99% of all Serbia's churches to be built. Thus Serbia was turned into a reliable ally for future Turkish attacks on the (then entirely Catholic) Europe. A strong geostrategic shield was thus put in place that was supposed to enable England sweet dreams for centuries to come. Most of the continental Europe indeed became a never-ending Warfield for geostrategic battles to be fought at, battles that will claim hundreds of millions of lives over the next five centuries, some of which however left England quite harmed as well...
Just like it cooperated with the Byzantine Empire in dragging the Bulgarian schismatic "Bogomilians" over to Bosnia in the 12th century (as soon as the Pope created Bosnia) to prevent Bosnians from identifying themselves with Catholicism and consequently pledging allegiance to the Holy See, England used the subsequent Turkish presence in the 16th century for the same purpose, via Islamization. In the same manner as in the previous cases, the Hapsburgs were given Bosnia in 1878, just as Russia is given Bosnia - today, as we speak. In order to keep them in check so they never fly off the handle (that is: start thinking they're greater than what's needed for England's needs), England exposes its subdued allies to all sorts of historical burdens. Thus the entire Turkish people "got" the stigma of Armenian Genocide, the Germans "got" the Jewish Holocaust, and now all Serbs "got" the Srebrenica Genocide (limited - as Serbs aren't to be disposed of just yet!) What the English are doing here is using the Roman Empire's strategy of divide and rule very efficiently, where one tribe/people is used against another, however always in a different era and under seemingly contradictory geopolitical circumstances. (The English are careful to impact the mankind's history only for so much, where at least one average lifetime passes between consecutive havocs, so that no one could relate the events or connect them with England).
The famous "majesty" of the England's global dominance stems entirely from the willingness of the English (more precisely: their symbiotic diplomats and financiers) to manipulate the weaknesses of foreign regimes and their key individuals via the infamous unholy B-trinity of the Mid Ages: Blackmail them, or Bribe them, or Burn them. The shiny glamour of the English "culture" holds on to indisputable mountains of starched blood of the innocent. This 4th wealthiest nation in the world - itself without (comparatively) any significant natural resources - has been using the best of its culprit minds (mostly Lords, then as nowadays, but today also some esteemed university professors) for the past 1600 years, that is, since the English bishops effectively separated from the Vatican. It's exclusively due to their culprit psyche, and not their qualities of any sort, that the English have become so unbelievably rich, so undeservedly powerful, and so unspeakably guilty. Alas, there is no Galactic Police to arrest them.
at
20:28
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Bosnia-H%z$wa, what's in the name
Imagine a European country in which official history teaches for over a century that "no one knows how the country became" or cannot explain why the country was named the way it was named. In addition, all official discussions of that country's history since the Antiquity and on, carry compulsory labels that say: "very little known about", "not understood", "very little evidence" etc. Well, imagine no more, for that country is Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hmm, Bosnia and what? Oh, you thought I said Bosnia and Southern Bosnia... Because, doesn't "Herzegovina" stand for a southern region of the country, named after Duke (German: Herzog) Stjepan Kosača, a medieval landowner of that region's largest chunk?
at
17:04
Monday, September 10, 2007
Britain - complicit to genocide, TWICE!
Exercising her free will and the rights reserved as stated in the earlier proceedings in this case [see below]; Following the 14 years of delays under Britain-instated duress in the Bosnia v. Serbia case; Unsatisfied with the obviously unjust verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case by the International Court in Hague presided by an English woman; the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is hereby suing the United Kingdom and other states previously implicated as stated in the above, for GENOCIDE..
15 November, 1993
.
.
Article IX
of the Genocide Convention:
First, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has failed in their affirmative obligation and refused "to prevent" genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of Article I of the Genocide Convention, which provides as follows:"The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in the time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish." Second, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has illegally imposed and maintained an arms embargo upon the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51 while acting in its capacity as a Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council. The United Kingdom has also aided and abetted the ongoing genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina by actively opposing all of the efforts by other States to "lift" this illegal arms embargo. For these reasons, we will charge that the United Kingdom has violated Article III, paragraph (e) of the Genocide Convention that expressly prohibits "complicity in genocide." The legal basis for this charge has been developed at length by Judge ad hoc Elihu Lauterpacht in his Separate Opinion attached to the World Court's Order of 13 September 1993 in the Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), which is currently pending. Finally, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom is both jointly and severally liable for all of the harm that has been inflicted upon the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina because the United Kingdom is an aider and abettor to genocide under the Genocide Convention and international criminal law.
.
. We also serve notice upon all of the more than 100 Contracting Parties to the Genocide Convention that each and every one of them has a solemn legal and moral obligation "to prevent" the commission of genocide in and against the People and State of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as required by Article I.
.
.
.
****
.
.
Professor Francis A. Boyle
Law Building 504
E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, Ill.
61820
3 January 1994
Professor Boyle ("the author") called the Registrar of the International Court of Justice in order to make three basic Points to him for transmission to the Judges of the World Court:
.
1. The Bosnian decision to withdraw the lawsuit against the United Kingdom was made under duress, threats, and coercion perpetrated by the British government and the governments of several other European states upon the highest level officials of the Bosnian government in Geneva, London, and Sarajevo. Therefore the so-called agreement to withdraw the lawsuit against Britain was void ab initio. I reserved the right of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to denounce this agreement at any time and to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom in accordance with the Statement of 15 November 1993.
.
2. The British government demanded that the author be fired as the General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Court. The British government knew full well that the author was the one responsible for the Bosnian strategy at the World Court, and especially for the recommendation to sue Britain.
.
3. Toward the end of conversation with the Registrar on 3 January 1994, the author made an oral Request that the World Court indicate provisional measures proprio motu in order to protect the People and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina from extermination and annihilation by the rump Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia. He pointed out to the Registrar that this oral Request was in accordance with the terms of the written Request for provisional measures proprio motu in advance that was already set forth in Bosnia's Second Request for Provisional Measures of 27 July 1993. The Registrar informed him that the Court was paying close attention to the situation in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Pursuant to Point 2, above, the author was relieved of his responsibilities as General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the World Court on 12 January 1994.
at
15:55
Sunday, September 9, 2007
GEOSTRATEGY, what's in the word
.
Isn't it remarkable indeed that GEOSTRATEGY, a word so important and so frequently cited (Google returns: 100,000) cannot be found in a high-esteemed encyclopedia such as the most famous and most praised one of them all - the Britannica? Things omitted can indeed matter more than things considered. Thus is the case with the Britannica that, to make things even weirder, does report on strategy - from the battlefield to the national level - but stops short of reporting on geostrategy as the "strategy of all strategies". It's with this thought in mind that I write this blog. My goal is to expose those geostrategies that are the culprit behind the millennial suffering of the Bosnian people.

at
23:55