2012 Physics Nobel Laureates Wineland And Haroche Stole The Discovery, Says Crown Prince

Royal Swedish Academy As A Crime Scene – It is revealed that 2012 Nobel laureates for physics have stolen the rewarded discovery that was submitted to one of the recipient’s public NIST office for verification back in 2008.

Stockholm/Sarajevo, January 11, 2013 – An official report was submitted to Nobel Committee and Swedish Police, offering proof beyond doubt that this year’s recipients of Nobel Prize in physics, David J. Wineland and Serge Haroche, were awarded the Prize for a discovery they acquired from Bosnian Crown Prince Mensur Omerbashich in 2008, while at the same time betraying public trust in responsible office Wineland fills at NIST.

Their “ingenious” discovery is actually Dr. Omerbashich’s discovery of how quantum and mechanist-scales physics are related/cancelled via simple fundamental ratio of 369.2 (gravitational resonance). The discoverer had sent his result to NIST in 2008 expecting a comment and verification from their publicly funded office. Instead of responding properly, Wineland (of NIST) forged his research and presented the discovery as his own. Haroche is at fault by association past 2008.

All Wineland did was trivially use a gas with affinity equal to Dr. Omerbashich’s fundamental ratio (369.2 kJ mol−1 –> Argon), while hiding the fact that he learned about this fundamental ratio from Dr. Omerbashich via personal communication. He thus “ingeniously” annulled the “magical” causes of entanglement. He still pretends he “doesn’t know” why of all beams, it is Argon which works for this specific purpose. Also, Dr. Omerbashich clearly states in his work that entanglement is not real and Wineland knew this also from Dr. Omerbashich. But instead of admitting he/they just verified another man’s discovery, Wineland and Haroche presented it as their own while Dr. Omerbashich waited (and waited) for a reply.

Since the recipients have obtained the discovery through a heinous act of crime, they must be stripped of the Prize regardless of its rules since no one is above law. The rules themselves must be amended in this case in order to comply with the law for the present case and for all future, so that criminals with degrees could never again be awarded the highest accolade.

Basic information and documentation including parts of the correspondence can be found at: http://sites.google.com/site/omerbashich/blog_sci#Nobel

Source: H.R.H. Crown Prince Mensur Omerbashich of Bosnia
(Ph.D. Theoretical Geophysics, UNB Canada 2004)

The Bosnian Royal Family
P.O. Box 1
Sarajevo
Bosnia

www.royalfamily.ba

Press Release >>

Is Our Universe Tidally Engaged With Another Universe?

By Alan Gray

 "Scientist develops absolute cosmological theory, discovering how to express gravitation in terms of speed of light. The theory of hyperresonance shows gravitation is stringdom's eigenoscillation at exactly multiples of c..."

                                                                                                                           Read Full Story

Tužna strana bosanske nauke - kako ne raditi doktorsku disertaciju | The sad side of Bosnian science -- How not to do your Ph.D. thesis

• Omerbašić, M. (2012) Primjedbe, mišljenja, prijedlozi i pitanja na predloženu disertaciju kandidata Mr. Medzida Mulić : "Istraživanje uticaja ITRF realizacija na koordinate, njihovu tačnost i određivanje vektora i brzina GPS tačaka na području BiH" (14.02.2012; odbrana: 27.02.2012 na JU "Građevinski fakultet" Univerziteta u Sarajevu) PDF (The sad side of Bosnian science: how not to do your PhD dissertation - example of Medzida Mulic -- in Bosnian); Dopuna - Asim Bilajbegovic (PDF)
DOPUNA 2 - Krivična prijava MUP-Centar Sarajevo - Kukuruz, Crnčalo (PDF)
Dopuna 3 - krivična prijava MUP Centar Sarajevo - Avdispahić, dopune PDF 

Strong earthquakes are caused by astronomical alignments

(FOR DETAILED PAGE CLICK HERE)



ASTRONOMICAL ALIGNMENTS:

THE CAUSE OF STRONG EARTHQUAKES
THE PROOF THAT STRONG EARTHQUAKES OCCUR DURING EARTH'S ALIGNMENTS WITH CELESTIAL OBJECTS, DUE TO MAGNIFICATION OF MASS RESONANCE - 12 Apr 11

NOTE THAT ALIGNMENT-SEISMICITY CAUSALITY IS BY EXCLUSION, AND 2011 EMPIRICAL PROOF IS JUST ONE PART IN THE 3-STEP PROOF WHERE THE 2011 PAPER TALKS ABOUT BODY RESONANCE (NOT ORBITAL) AND ABOUT TIDALLY TRIGGERED RESONANCE MAGNIFICATION (NOT TIDAL FORCES). FINALLY, THE MECHANISM FOR THE CAUSALITY IS IN THE 2007-2008 PAPERS' EQUATIONS,  AND THE M(6-5%)+ EARTHQUAKES ARE USED FOR ENHANCING THE PATTERN (THAT IS, AT THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF RESONANCE MAGNIFICATION)

 

III) Empirical proof (2011) of the georesonator concept (the Earth thought of as a forced mechanical oscillator) is now available as a preprint. Strong (~M6+) seismicity on Earth occurs due to magnification of Earth masses' (mostly the mantle's) resonance during the Earth's long (>3 days) astronomical alignments with astronomical objects in our solar system.  The causality is by exclusion: it stems from the fact that there are no alternative intermediaries in Space (relating earthquakes and alignments indirectly), other than the hyperresonator (see theoretical proof below). So the correlation is real. Physically, the concept is akin to a bridge eventually collapsing due to soldiers step-marching across it. Thus earthquake precursors such as atmospheric or Sun activity ones are not due to some mysterious "outgoing radiation", but are a part of the same outer forcing that acts naturally along the forcing towards the Earth. For example, since the here demonstrated concept is universal, the Sun’s largest coronal mass ejection recorded, of 7 June 2011, occurred during multiple long alignments Sun-Venus-Mars and Elenin-Sun-Uranus. (Real, logic-bound scientists are normally harassed and bullied, usually by corrupt masonic "scientists", for merely reporting on the causality between Sun's oscillations and Earth's seismicity, climate, etc.) This particular ejection was a Sun equivalent of a M9+ earthquake due to the Elenin. (NOTES: the main reason why the comet C/2010X1 (Elenin) is included here with planets (in addition to the fact it drags gravitationally locked particles spanning 30k+ km) is because it is non-periodic (thus making an apparently static approach and therefore partaking in long alignments), and its trajectory is coplanar to our solar system. Other such comets have forbidding inclinations: their trajectories lie outside our solar system's plane so those comets never align with planets.) Strong seismicity during long alignments has mostly to do with object's low orbital inclination, low speed and large apparent size. Therefore only objects which are virtually co-planar to our Solar system's "plane" and which take up a significant portion of the sky are of relevance here, such as the Sun, the planets and the comet Elenin, but not any other comets or asteroids. The only M6- earthquakes included in this study were those flagged as significant (killer) by USGS. Here the M6 threshold was selected as ~M6+ seismicity emits ~70-90% (a range depending on deviation from the annual average, due to M9+ earthquakes) of all energy from all earthquakes and this 3-step proof is all about determining the mechanism responsible for Earth tectonogenesis as well as most earthquakes (something geophysics still cannot answer). This cutoff then enables also for a path of resonance magnification to be discerned: the M6-M7 earthquakes were then used also to increase the sample size and thus enable for demonstration of the path characteristic of resonance magnification (increase-peaking-decrease in strong seismicity). more::

II) Theoretical proof (2008; or see 2006 version with theoretical and instrumentation proofs lumped together), by showing that absolute generalization - so to apply to all universes at all times - of georesonator to hyperresonator (our Universe thought of as a mechanical oscillator tidally forced by outer universes), results in a first-ever analytical expression for a physical constant: the "Newtonian gravitational constant", G.  Gravitation, and not physics, is scalable along a scale, s, so that: G = s e^2, thus disproving both Einstein's and Planck's assumptions on modifiable physics along largest and smallest scales respectively, as being fundamentally flawed.  The derived equation is that of levitation (anti-gravity), and represents the 4th Kepler's Law as the link between Kepler's orbital and all gravitational theories. What does it mean? For example, quantum mechanics is merely a misinterpretation of reality: "entanglement", "non-locality" etc. are due to georesonator providing common settings for quantum physics to trivially work at (terrestrial) distance. There is no need to look further for "God's particle". The above "God's tune" means He composes for the Symphony. (Ergo, He exists!)

I) Instrumentation-data proof (2007; or see 2006 version with theoretical and instrumentation proofs lumped together), by successfully matching world's most accurate gravity field records (decadal, 1Hz accelerations from the Canadian superconducting gravimeter) to decadal M7+ seismicity at or up to 3 days before luni-solar alignments. This paper showed that gravity of the total (all-masses inclusive) Earth responds strongly to Earth’s alignments with the Moon and the Sun, disturbing the Earth enough so that magnification of mechanical resonance is set off. The resonance magnification of the mantle (most of the Earth) gives rise to tectonics and, separately, strong earthquakes. This is now extended to the solar system as a whole and demonstrated.

Den of Thieves IV - Technicalities so Proclaimed

USPTO, Art Unit 2857, 2/17/11:

I am in receipt of the Interview Summary communication of 02.10.2011 (appended) in my patent application 12/022,409.  I thank the Government for such a significant shortening of delivery time that went from half a year in a very important matter communicated (refer to previous communication of last summer), down to under a week in a matter entirely insignificant (see below).

Note that, from the moment the Government has revealed, in form of a self-indictment, that it is a party with financial interest in the matter of patent application 12/022,394, the Government's own procedural regulations ceased being relevant to the patentability of that or any other patent applications of mine such as the 12/022,409. Therefore, the herein made arguments also apply to all of my communication in all of my patent applications such as the 12/022,394.  When cited in the below, the Government's own procedural regulations are used for illustration purposes only and merely to depict additionally the Government's own inconsistency -- now a standard mistreatment of my rights and freedoms in my patent applications (hereinafter: these matters).

While not subjecting myself to any particular procedural regulation of the Government's any more, be it noted (as an example of mistreatment as mentioned above) that this email correspondence of mine is in accordance with the Government's own regulation MPEP713.04 that you cite: "All business with the Patent and Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. (...) The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be based exclusively on the written record in the Office. (...)". In the absence of a "must" or a "has to" or a "shall" instead of a "should" in the first sentence cited above, as well as in the absence of adjective "paper" when referring to "the written record" in the second sentence above, it is clear that the cited regulation applies to all sorts of communication and not just the paper-written correspondence. It is also clear that the adjective "written" in the above refers to either electronic or paper communication equally, and that electronic and paper correspondence carry the same legal weight as well. (This also based on other, more general legislation that shall normally prevail, due to the Government now being a party with self-declared financial interest in these matters).

In the same fashion, the herewith-appended Interview Summary's finding, stating that the interview "does not response point out specific details believed to render the claims patentable over the reference", is baseless due to the above-mentioned Government's own regulation you cite and which states that, in order for an interview to be completely and properly recorded: "(E) The identification of arguments need not be lengthy or elaborate. A verbatim or highly detailed description of the arguments is not required. The identification of the arguments is sufficient if the general nature or thrust of the principal arguments can be understood in the context of the application file. Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner;". Note that I did not "desire to emphasize and fully describe", because (1) it so pleases me; and (2) I do not have to base my actions on the Government's own scribblings any more, and (3) the examiner is likely biased as he is an employee of the party that has a financial interest in these matters.

Therefore, I consider all of my email correspondence in all of my patent applications properly recorded and admissible as they are. Accordingly, I now expect the Government, as the future accused party, to address all the main issues in these matters without further delay as, from my point of view, there are no more technicalities to prevent addressing the main issues as outlined in my requests to the USPTO and US Secretary of Health. Note however that this final communication of mine does not mean I am willing to extend the deadlines as given by those notices.

Dr. Mensur Omerbashich

Den of Thieves III - Once a Thief...

To: USPTO, Art Unit 2857, 1/24/11:

I am in receipt of your Final paper communication of 12.09.2010 in my other patent application, 12/022,409.  As expected (based on my extremely negative experience with your office in Re my other application, 12/022,394), you continue treating me in a manner that cannot be justified at all. This time you insult my intelligence (such as when you replace my terminology with -- synonyms), correct your own corrections just like with my other application, manipulate facts about my idea in Re this specific application, etc. Worse yet, now you go so far as to entirely make up a connection between my idea and a 2000 patent #6,049,727 by Crothall, K.D., issued to Animas Corp. now a subsidiary of the $100B+ Johnson & Johnson (hereinafter: J&J). That patent's owner manufactures just one type of (pivotal) medical equipment: innovative insulin pumps w/ noninvasive bracelets for testing blood/fluid glucose levels, based on the idea they patented in 2000 and that you now claim to be identical to my idea in theoretical spectral analysis. You then use this wild-guessed connection of yours as grounds for rejecting my application entirely.

While I am honored that the USPTO thinks my idea is the same as the one patented in 2000 which helps millions of diabetes patients worldwide, and that that idea/patent had made such a mega-corporation like J&J wish to acquire a spin-off created solely around that patent, you at the same time make a leap of faith so gigantic that it is readily recognized for what it is: flawed and malicious. To demonstrate it, I am herein reproducing your own words in italics: namely, your own interpretation of the 2000 J&J patent, v. my idea (critical keywords are shown in caps):

"With respect to claim 1, Crothall discloses SPECTRUM COMPUTATIONS IMPROVE when ALL VALUES in a dataset that is CHARACTERIZED by NON-UNIFORM RELIABILITY are FIRSTLY WEIGHTED according to THEIR ERRORS (i.e. BETA WEIGHTED) that were A-PRIORI ASSESSED based on TASK-SPECIFIC OR GENERALLY ACCEPTED SCIENTIFIC CRITERIA; and

With respect to claim 2, Crothall discloses PURIFICATION of that dataset VIA REMOVAL of UP TO 50% of its VALUES with RELATIVELY LARGEST ERRORS, from that dataset and PRIOR TO FEEDING the data into GAPS-INSENSITIVE SPECTRAL ALGORITHM (i.e. PLS)."

First note that in your communication you outright reject my terminology that is however exactly the same as that used by yourself in the above to form the grounds for rejection, thus mocking me personally.  Secondly, no above keyword is mentioned in the J&J patent you used to essentially (as you say it yourself) base your decision on.  Thirdly, a thorough inspection into the J&J patent v. my application renders illogical any such alleged connection whatsoever, already at the freshman-statistics level: neither do the compared ideas use a same spectral analysis method, nor is "PLS" a gap-insensitive spectral algorithm! (Hint: only the full least squares spectral analysis with its variance magnitudes makes one such algorithm.)

Given the above demonstration and the stated scientific facts, it is thus clear to anyone with half brain that your Government now infringes as-a-matter-of-factually upon my right to even obtain a patent protection of any idea of mine whatsoever.  I now believe that your reasons for such a discrimination extend beyond what you disclose. (Added reason to strengthen that belief: the publicly available statistics from the USPTO, according to which 2 out of 3 patent applications do get granted -- alas not so for just anyone).  The overall conclusion is that the Government you represent denies me entirely the rights for obtaining protection over my intellectual property, as granted to every person under the Constitution of the United States and applicable domestic & international conventions as well as legal customs.

One possible motif that I can think of when it comes to the Government's commitment to such grave injustice towards me, is the fact that this particular idea of mine, just like the one in my other application 12/022,394, offers a whole slew of lucrative applications, making my ideas all that more lucrative to the Government too, rather than to myself -- a nobody in comparison to one such Oh great a government.  Another reason that readily comes to mind in the same sense is the fact that the Government has been recently caught in wrongdoing Re my other patent application, and that the Government therefore backfires now like a petty thief who is being pushed to the wall by law enforcement and thereby left with no alternative.

Given that, curiously enough, you disclose only Government or Government-related pharmaceutical beneficiaries of my ideas (goes for both of my applications), but not other such beneficiaries, say military, I now come to the belief based on this 2-of-2 mini-statistics that my ideas, just like those by Mr. Tesla or Mr. Meucci or others earlier, were/are subject to numerous illicit applications by the Government in other fields from within Government's and Government-related financial interests as well, such as but not limited to: chemical industry, weaponry/armament R&D, Space program, etc.

With that in mind, I conclude this official response to your mailing of 12.09.2010, and turn to seeking protection of my basic human rights, freedoms, and intellectual property in both patent applications of mine, as those rights, freedoms, and intellectual property have been hijacked from me by the Government you represent -- one utterly inhumane entity that deserves nothing but scorn, despisal and harmful fist of justice.

Be it noted that I, as the sole inventor and applicant in this patent application, hereby dispute the final decision by the USPTO in its entirety, on the grounds of its quasi-scientific reasoning, as well as for other reasons as stated in the above.  In fair dealing, I hereby propose that the USPTO withdraws its herein disputed decision in its entirety, and grant my patent application as filed with its amendments.

Dr. Mensur Omerbashich

Den of Thieves II - Lab Harvest

To: USPTO, Art Unit 2857, 1/13/11

I am in receipt of your "Final" Final paper communication of 12/28/2010, by which you cancel the finality of your previous paper communication of last fall, and as a "one-time courtesy" offer me a 3-month extension to reply to your Final communication. Let's pretend that that "Final" is final.

 

I find it laughable that you used such an opportunity (created by yourself in what seems to be a standardized procedure when justifying the theft of ideas in the name of the Government -- read on) to include a bunch of ridiculous statements such as those correcting even more of your own corrections, as well as changing communication status. Furthermore, I find it remarkable that you insert a law citation in a "non-suspicious" place within your communication, by which you actually let me know that the Government, by virtue of a law it itself has passed earlier, is somehow (in that Government's imagination) safeguarded i.e. allowed to steal a published idea as long as such a theft occurs within a year since the idea was published!?  (Hurry up, Joe!)  I could not believe my eyes that you actually would use such an outright manipulation -- taking a law, meant to regulate life, out of context and waving it as a red rag in front of bull's eyes.

Indeed, all thieves exhibit a distinct behavioral pattern as characterized by (A) clear intention to steal, and (B) clear intention to manipulate in order to justify the stealing once caught.  Isn't it remarkable that a Government is no different in this respect than a common petty criminal, displaying an all-absence of moral consciousness.  Obviously, the individual-Government turnpike is a two-way road. So the government (in all its branches) shall be held accountable for its crimes just like any petty criminals are. It shall also be held accountable for covering up those activities, regardless the method of crime (laws, police, intelligence, tortures, etc.) unless to an extent there is a national security issue, which any sane minds readily fail to see in my case.  Therefore, the Government's above-described behavior is hereby found entirely unacceptable, also given the special "treatment" I received from the US and Canadian governments since I came up with the idea in 1999, as described in my blog.  That "treatment" included, but was not limited to, mysterious disappearance of the (really) final draft of my PhD thesis in none other than the US Government's 'US Mail'. Isn't it curious (and convenient for the Government alone) that, had not been for that mystery, the Government could not have patented my idea as its own within a year?  Revealing. An Agatha Christie case in all elements.

 

Even if the law, as you invoke it, were (not) meant to protect thievery, I don't feel obliged by a thief's proclamation in which he finds it OK to rob me within that-and-that time frame. And if I wait long enough, thinks the thief in his twisted mind, I could maybe obtain a patent (hip hip, hooray!) -- only if my idea wasn't "too" interesting to begin with. Says thus the Government: only in such a case where my idea appeared boring, e.g. to the great minds of a Government's lab, could I get a patent that equates some crumbs on the floor. While failing to see why I should even be satisfied with them crumbs (Mr. Gates or Mr. Marconi were not!) while being forced to watch as a big fat thief walks away with my pie, I definitely do not accept the Government's stipulation (as placed in-between your own lines) repelling me "by law" from taking actions to protect my own intellectual property. Down with laws that protect them thieves!  More importantly, down with reading of laws that takes laws or their parts out of context and uses them to justify thievery instead of what they are meant for: regulating things for the betterment of the society!

No matter what language you used or what laws (issued by the same Government) you picked to hide behind, the cold truth remains as follows: the Government has stolen the idea from me and patented it as its own. That's what counts, really.  It is logically forbidden to expect that this same idea in fundamental sciences could have occurred twice in history, and within such a short period of time. Of course, I could believe in such a coincidence (famous examples do exist) if on the other side of this equation were another sole researcher of at least the caliber as that of Omerbashich, and not a bunch of ready-made FDA lab personnel utilized by the US Government for its reverse-engineering schemes on a massive scale.  Your tacitly citing of the above-mentioned law in your "Final" Final communication speaks volumes -- I am now positive beyond any doubt that the Government is well aware of its thievery as described herein and as indicated by its actions including your ready-made assemblage. Moreover, I am somehow confident that you have got even more tools in your ready-made toolbox for repelling us "stupid inventors with great ideas" from bugging such a great government, oh the greatest one of all time (minus that first unlucky year).

But what's even more mind blowing is the fact that the Government has also remunerated me as an inventor by virtue of stealing my idea (to laugh or to cry, that is the question), and then also treated me both as a mentally challenged person and the state enemy No.1, all while pretending that "all is good". The Government thus resembles a 2 year old child who believes closing the eyes makes it too invisible, but also an imbecile who believes having no teeth means he can eat pearls without breaking the jaw.  A Government that pretends to be serious while using high-profile wording (or drowning in it, rather), but is in fact and by its essence merely a "mindless thief in a boiler suit", renders your latest (Final?) correspondence, spiced with its ready-made additives, not worthy of further communication.  FYI, I reproduce below my extended personal statement Re this case, as it appears in my personal blog. My previously filed requests to Secretary of Health and to USPTO in the same manner remain unabated.

Unlike Mr. Tesla or Mr. Meucci or numerous others that you (the USPTO) also robbed a great deal but who apparently forgave to you all (Tesla, for example, graciously never forgave to his robbers only the fact that "they couldn't come up with those same ideas on their own"), I on the other hand regret that I ever lifted a pen let alone discovered several natural laws as the only laws that need no human approval.  When I see who is benefiting from my discoveries, I feel sick to my stomach.

May God have mercy on the planet on which a Den of Thieves you represent is seen as the brightest light of them all.

Dr. Mensur Omerbashich

Den of Thieves

What would you do if the US Government had stolen a multibillion idea from you, and protected it under its own name (FDA) in a record-breaking time, less than a year since you published that idea in your PhD thesis? Even worse: not only that they actually did it to you -- but their own patent office now admits it, black on white!

Well, that's exactly what happened to me. In fact, there is even more to the sickening story: they played dirty both before and afterwords. Thus the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), a US Government's own bureau,  dragged my patent application for nearly five years (their publicized statistical average is 18 months), "lost" my filings/amendments half a dozen times, provided wrong instructions at least four times, and so on.  Even prior to the theft, the final draft of my PhD thesis "got lost" in none other then -- the US mail, extending my oral defense for more than half a year. Two PhD committees had resigned also, while many other "nuisances" occurred along the way as well. Those included constant harassment by the Canadian & US police, the Canadian SWAT team breaking into my apartment at 4 am with dogs and automatic weapons, US immigration officers pulling guns at me and holding me captive at the US-Canada border while claiming that "on a tip from the Canadian authorities my US Driver's License contained false data", Canadian & US cops pulling me over and searching the vehicle and me more than a hundred times during the last two years of my PhD often at gunpoint with hands up and sometimes twice in a same day, as well as other forms of pressure to leave my studies such as doubling of my tuition in the middle of academic year because -- I got transferred from the Masters to PhD without oral defense (for excellence, what else)...  The situation about me has become so curious over that time, that the then director of Graduate Studies in Canada noticed I was some sort of a "trouble magnet".  Was I indeed... (And I didn't even mention sudden and life-threatening health issues so curious that any diagnosis was literally impossible except for possibly the deadly poisoning one).

It all continued well beyond my grad school too: when you send in application for 23 positions at NASA over several months period and get a response to none (under the US law they must notify all applicants on the outcome of every application), or when you submit your sole-authorship paper on a prime physical discovery (on mechanist tectonogenesis of the Earth) to 55 English-language journals and get all rejections -- half of which display ignorance and poor manners of referees and the other half contain no explanation at all -- whereas the first (and a prominent) French journal to which you submit the same paper referees it and publishes it virtually immediately as the lead article and features it on its cover page, when you publish another lead paper again as a sole author in an IOP journal in which you kill a nine-referees-approved Nature paper and then they sack that journal's editor while attacking you and your paper so that Nature can continue in its role as a holy cow of Elizabeth's geostrategy regardless, when... you don't really exist, other than as a source of marvelous ideas in fundamental sciences (which their own best minds and the entire turgid "ivy league" are incapable of inventing on their own) for one global-terrorist society and a true Empire of Evil that imported you as it imports a piece of raw meet  for general consumption -- to process, use and dispose of accordingly.

In the late Fall of 2010, the USPTO has finally admitted that my PhD thesis's main idea is identical to what the US Government had patented soon after my oral exam.

Watch "The Social Network" -- there's a pivotal story in that movie, told by the character playing Sean Parker, on how the US buccaneers actually do it to young minds with "too great" ideas... All in all, it's a quite sophisticated system of terror perpetrated 24/7 against the best minds of an era.  Watch and dare shoot for them stars!

UPDATE 1/13/11:  Reply to USPTO Communication of 12/28/10 - To: USPTO, Washington DC 
Patent dispute & request to cancel the patent- To: USPTO, Washington DC 
Notice of patent dispute, and remedy request - To: Secretary K. Sebelius, DoHHS, Washington DC

Wikisneaks Prelude for Silent Night Long Night, in X Mole

I don't believe anything that gets constant coverage by all the controlled media in the world, starts with the prefix "wiki", can fly in and out of the world's most secret mainframes just like 007 does (difference being, 007 always digs out some heavy-weight stuff, like nukes or chems, not worthless gossip), threatens to release "secrets on UFO's" if not left alone, faces Joe Lieberman-led "Inquisition", is located in Her Majesty's wreck-yard Australia, and has a long-term partnership with the leading British newspaper Guardian.  An Anglo-Zionist theater, sacrosanct!

Now pardon me for being realistic, but what a perfect pretext for a shutdown on Internet freedoms, eh? This time around, the cyber-bin Laden comes "straight" from Sweden! Or was it Australia? Or Britain... In any case, quite a remarkable return of the 9/11 (13th) Jedi, it seems, only this time the ghost foe isn't located in an unnamed desert cave equipped with a supah-dupah kidney dialysis medical facility (and staff). This time the enemy is you, and me, and anyone else who uses computers for anything besides debilitating work. You know what Pastor Niemöller said of 1930-ies Nazi Germany: first they came looking for Jews...  In our time and age, it goes something like this:

First they came for hackers,

But I wasn't online to fetch secrets.

Then they came for "cyber-pedophiles",

But children never interested me sexually.

Then they came for anonymous-browsing ISP's,

But I said hey, how else to catch hackers and pedos.

Then they came for me, saying it's illegal to type or think or speak,

And by that time there was no one left to speak up, except for Nobel Peace laureate Assange.

As Christmas without coughing birds, swine, cows, monkeys, mosquitoes or squirrels is approaching, the silent night, the long night, is falling over Sweden. You know, the quite exhausting one, lasting for half a year? For the rest of us, considered by extension to be lucky, it's "just" the silent night falling over mankind. And for the longevity of it, well, that bugger has a naughty habit of lasting for half the eternity, easy.

I am now in position to foretell that, following the two testing ones, the next global virus scare will be the successful one. Here, the "success rate" is measured in terms of tens, if not hundreds of millions of deaths..  Simply put, the stage is set, the lights are dimming, and silence lays everywhere

Along those same lines, I also think the time has come. It's either six million of them, the Illuminati-Masonic-Bilderberg-English-Zionist-Imperialist-Leftist-Egotist (IMBEZILE for short), or six billion of us. Take a pick. Or take the pick. Or whatever firm and sharp object you can get your hands on. You're gonna need it, soon enough.

Quo Vadis, America?

The "final solution" that the Illuminati/Masons/Bilderbergs/English/Zionists/Industrials/Liberals/Israeli are trying to accomplish is to set on Christians and Muslims (traditionally and geostrategically strongest allies against Anglo-Zionism) against each others -- to mutual extermination down to negligible numbers, using atomic and other weaponry of mass destruction set off in a series of staged "terrorist attacks".

For example, the same Swedish minister who last year expelled Christianity from schools, now "suddenly" reversed his stand entirely. Angela Merkel "suddenly" and shockingly announces to the world that integration of foreigners (she means Muslims, who make 5% of Germany, which is the highest) has totally failed... Watch for the like signs of the elite intensifying the cultural interface collision between Christians and Muslims!

The above listed bunch pretends to be God loving only until the stage is set for the "solution". After the "solution", the age of godless evil on Earth enters the stage. So this struggle isn't just about religion -- it's primarily about biological extermination of competing races so that the remaining race could continue thriving on remaining resources that the Earth provides. After Anglos and their bunch have dealt with billions of followers of Christ and Mohammad, the Asians and Africans are too easy to deal with, perhaps using different means but in the same manner.  Just as American Natives were "taken care of" (by using plague-infected blankets as a gift; tricking them into "reserves", etc.) -- on to Hiroshima and beyond... Leave any doubt!! (It's my nature, said the scorpio).

The key for this geostrategy to succeed, is to first turn the US into a Nazi statelet, just as with Germany in 1930-ies. The corruption of masses (one million millionaires in the US alone!), expelling God from schools, etc., are only signs of what's to come from the elites' kitchen...

From Stockholm with Love: The son-of-a Angie movie

Imagine a Holocaust motion picture, featuring cream de la Hollywood, produced with top dollar, and shot at exclusive and exquisite locations including those named in that movie. Everything seems so real, so historic and so monumental, "better than authentic", as they say. It's exactly like supreme art should make us feel: the camp is there, encircled by rows of pointlessly curled, electrified barb wire. Coldness on the spot. The high towers can be seen also, as they throw their unquestionable shadows not just onto the camp's ground, but symbolically onto the whole of mankind first and foremost too. A solitary, sickening, black chimney can be seen as well - the one and only thing overshadowing the shadow... Evil on top of evil. A drama waiting to unfold before our very own eyes.

And I don't want to hear them naughty creeps a.k.a. the movie critics -- I mean who could, in their right mind, ever, possibly, I mean c'mON, even DARE to question authenticity of ANYTHING in such a superbly made picture, so correctly set up!? Right?  Well, not so correctly set up, after all: not only the plot of this allegedly historic picture is actually a total fake, but it's also a faded replica of a love story depicting the romance between that camp's commander and a Jewish girl who "happens" to be an inmate there. Wow, Benigni meets Shakespeare.

(OK, I'm back from throwing up). Seriously, it makes one scratch one's head, and ask: what in the world could possibly be the message of such a bizarre movie then? Say, Love beats War? Or perhaps, Hope beats Tragedy? Hmm. It's more like Revisionism beats History. Ah, those facts... Morbid as it sounds, the above screenplay (or something along those cheesy lines) is actually happening these days. Under the directing of none other but Prima Donna of the Hollywood's kill'em & shoot'em scene, Ms. Angelina Jolie The Merciless, herself. A devil turned angel? Ha-ha.

One night when she was a big girl, Angelina Jolie dreamt a dream. In it, big Angie saw herself directing a movie. And because all of them awards and her extraterrestrial fame which she had accrued previously in an uberhumanly short period of time, have become boring (happens to some, as stage lights illuminate them), she quickly woke up (it's alright, Leo de Caprio OK'd it!) and realized -- like any good spoiled baby brat should -- "Oh my God, I haf'ta do this, I haf'ta I haf'ta, nah nah nah nah naaah!!" Then, according to the screenplay composed by an equally illuminated uberwriter, she phoned her husby, an actor renown for his even greater uberhuman speed at which he acquired his galactic superfame, only to hear from his baby-manly (c'mon, it's Hollywood) mouth the so many times rehearsed yet splendid words of nothing less than total support. "Darlin', you haf'ta, you haf'ta, you... haf'ta!  Just do it, girl! Chase your dream, baby! Oh, how much I love you!"  (Cuuut!!)

Oh well, nothing like a tacky, shitty Hollywood romance, is there. Sure, heck why not, if there is enough consumers to buy it...  BUT only before it starts mangling real people's nightmares, not dreams. Meet One woman's nightmare, another woman's dream: tens of thousands of raped women in Bosnia, many of whom were 10-ish at the time of their prison-camp captivity and systematic rape aimed at producing an army of "new warriors", will be able to watch a totally MADE-UP story on how it COULD HAVE HAPPENED to them too, had it not been as it happened to have happened as it happened, so be it. Not clear what it all means? "Oh well, it's all just entertainment, why are you so excited man?!" Ts ts.

A single question knocks down the whole ideology (as it's clearly NOT just simply an idea!) behind the Jolie's bloody attempt at historic revisionism, at evidence, and at all those numerous verdicts by international judiciary: Was it so difficult to find a REAL Mr. Oscar Schindler or Mr. John Rabe from those four long years of Bosnian Genocide? It was?! Well, too bad then. But don't you dare to fake world's history, Angie baby, just because them masters to whom you owe your ridiculous fame have told you to! For memories of your dirty little propaganda movie (which, sickeningly enough, turns one mental disorder known as the Stockholm Syndrome from the real-life genocide in Bosnia, into an imaginary Romeo & Juliet play while NOT forgetting to use the proper historic setting!), will haunt you and your children's children for generations to come. You're not making this production for us: you see, in the Balkans, we don't learn history in schools or from TV or movies for that matter; we learn history directly, and we learn it from two sources: our folks at home!  As for you and your chasing the cat's tail: life has so many ways of ruining people's dreams, and infinitely many ways of turning those dreams into nightmares.

Hitler had just one favorite director of propaganda movies during WWII, who too was a female. (Women seem to fall easily for romance-meets-bucks type of tactics, a.k.a. soapiness). When it occurs on top of a relatively just and materially rich society, well developed art is a positive phenomenon. But when it occurs in a dictatorship such as Hitler's, or in a colony like Bosnia (a dictatorship under Izetbegović 1993-2003), well developed art is a make-up used for beautifying one essentially evil regime that's against most of people in that society.  So there is only one thing worse than the worst movie: the lying son-of-a Angie movie! 

A personal note to the uberwriter: Mr. Kissinger, thank you very much for the Oscar that went to "No Man's Land", and for the Golden Bear for "Grbavica". Those nice awards that the American and German Film Academies respectively have bestowed, on behalf of fine "peacemakers" such as yourself, upon the authors of those two lying soaps that try to erase history so that you can assemble a third Yugoslavia readymade for a new circle of hell before your followers assemble the Fourth one and so on, were quite enough. Therefore, please Sir, please please please (how do I sound?) would you kindly keep your sweet sugarpie Angie somewhere near you? I mean, you must be on lookout for qualtiy propagandists, correct? Well, what better place for such a creature than by her master's feet?  Oh, and also, do take them domestic "authors" and "actors" from those soaps with you -- as they now smell your blood-red money and awards coming their way once again, they started barking at Genocide survivors who these days protest this newest episode by Henry's Infamous Hollywood Productions. But their barking is plain boring too, not to mention that it's all over the local media supported financially by fine people such as yourself. And since boredom is so inspiring for Angie, say have her start revising American history instead. Sorry, what? Can't hear you... Oh, that's the Truthers' trumpets, I gather. Ah, what a song. And it's right near you. Enjoy!

PS Sorry about all the CAPS: your movie is evil at so many different levels; the shouting may help.

Bosnian Royal Family Passes Act Of Constituting Kingdom Of Bosnia, Orders Great Powers Return Of Usurped Sovereignty To Royals

Via News

Antipope

Of all the tales on Christendom, perhaps none is more fascinating and mysterious than that of Antipopes. That there could be an invert to the "leader above all leaders", sounds bizarre at first, and difficult to picture. Yet, it has happened in the past, more than once. But in order to properly define what an Antipope is or what he does, thereby learning how to recognize one, an understanding of a pontiff in relation to the Christendom, must be acquired first. That is, not from the point of view of theology alone.

A Pope is the leader of the Church elected by those Cardinals who hold the voting right. They elect a leader amongst themselves, after supposedly feeling in their hearts which candidate is the right one. This method does seem rather a God's choice than that of a rational mind, on a par with the ancient way of electing a new King who is believed to have a divine right to the throne. The altar and the throne, according to the ancient wisdom by Plato and others, together make the safest concept of government ever designed, accommodating the human nature entirely. Because the human nature takes tens of thousands of years to change a significant bit, it’s logical to expect that this concept is the safest and most useful one today too, a full millennium and a half since the Roman Empire got transformed into a series of Christian kingdoms. Transformed but not fell, as all of the kings continued to be subjects of Rome’s. The regrettably wild spirits of the Anglo-Saxons however, have hit the concept hard as soon as it began unfolding. Thus the Christendom’s spiritual leader (the Bishop of Rome; the Pope) was met with a strong opposition from the Saxon princes and their ever-spreading bloodlines who mutinied more often than they obeyed. Thus the Cardinals realized as early as mid-twelfth century that the Pope must come from Italian priests. Surely enough, they learned this hard way, after the only English Pope ever, Adrian IV, named Barbarossa the Holly Roman Emperor (over-king) of all Christendom. Up until that point, Cardinals elected the Pope, and the Pope normally appointed an Emperor.

While the Church hardly ever desired to control anything more than their flock’s souls, Barbarossa wanted to control everything including them souls. So he kicked out the duly elected Pope from Rome, and appointed one himself, obedient only to him. The divinity was thus expunged from the process, and human imperfection took over both the earthly and heavenly thrones alike. But this doesn't mean that the Popes were perfect either. Take for example Eugene III, an imbecile who was ruled by one sinister St. Bernard, a French monk who overthrew the last Celtic Prince, Eustace, from the throne of Britain in order to bring his countrymen Anjous to rule Britain. But the monk was a monk was a... and the lack of divinity in his rule over Christendom had resulted in a rather short life for his "accomplishments" in the matters earthly.

After the next, sane and profoundly Italian Pope was elected (in the divine way), Anastasius IV, he sent the dispossessed Eustace to Bosnia in 1153 and had him start a new Kingdom, rightfully Celtic too, and where a rule of heart could be established just as in case of his father King Stephen who had thus ruled all of Britain. But this sane Pope didn't live very long, because you see, divine Popes seem to be endeared with the dear Lord too, so they end up in heavens before their number is called. His successor Pope, the above-mentioned Adrian, appoints his fellow Barbarossa, a son of the devil himself… Although political imbeciles were not uncommon even amongst the Italian pontiffs, still they occurred far less frequently and almost always had a homeland duty call for Rome, thus having been less harmful to the Church than those who were directly appointed by a Saxon Emperor (take for example Sigismund, and his wild attempts to destroy the divine essence of the Church too via his "Order of the Knights of the Dragon" that sponsored Hus, Ottomans, Luther, Einstein...). Although geostrategic influences on Popes existed before and after Barbarossa, it was him who started it big time, and sort of "streamlined" the process, with his own trademark called "the Antipope". Barbarossa tried hard to turn the Church into a nonsense-army of rational soul-keepers. (Just the same as he tried it back then, and equally infamously Sigismund centuries later, so is Elizabeth II too doing the same thing as we speak). Being the Pope's ancient safeguard, the rocky and rebellious Bosnia paid a high price for the weakened Rome, so Eustace (a.k.a. Black Knight Templar, Viceroy Boril Borič) got overthrown in 1163 by the Byzantine as their prize for rescuing the Rome from Barbarossa, but luckily not before he produced several dozens of offspring that unrolled as the Bosnia's only Royal Family... This episode was perhaps the hardest lesson the Church has ever learned in her never-ending fight against the Saxon: the Cardinals then firmly decided (after hiring the Byzantine mercenaries and thereby saving the Church from the Saxons' weird ideas and sword alike) to have only Italian priests fill the position of the Pope from then on. This was strategically and rationally the most brilliant decision ever taken by the Church, since the closeness of one’s birthplace to Rome meant the highest probability for one’s devotion to Rome also. And so the Church coped pretty well for the next 820 years. (The few non-Italian pontiffs in the meantime represent an exception that confirms the rule: elected under heavy pressure by the Emperors, those pontiffs were Antipopes De Facto, and were either short-lived (good ol' poison, eh) themselves or their doings reversed soon after they were gone). Until one day, marked by the "Vatican II"...

In 1978, a non-Italian Pope came about. Wow. What happened to them Cardinals? Have they lost their mind? Probably not; they just lost their connection to divinity, along with the rational understanding of how the world works and what actually kept the Church persist on Earth as well as in the heavens. (Some of them also got carried away by Catholic faith spreading across all continents, as if that meant their stronghold was any safer – on the contrary, overstretching your resources is the worst strategy imaginable!). Apparently, and most importantly, the world has become masterfully more complex (on the first sight at least), than it used to be before the age of artificial satellites. Individuals less interested in the true meaning of all the technological mumbo-jumbo that flooded the human psyche after the WWII, thus enabling the Baconian pseudo-science of the first Elizabethan era to finally thrive on Einstein-Planck fairytales, started becoming Cardinals. Just as with the rest of us, they too belonged to the techno-generation more than to the Classics Era, and dove into the Transistor Age ever happily and smiling…

It is entirely possible that John Paul II and Benedict XVI were/are actually the Antipopes and not the Popes. Several, geostrategically crucial factors clearly point at this conclusion. First and foremost, the ridiculous "fall of communism" in which John Paul II had a pivotal role. Second, there is the post-1970-ies extermination of the Kennedys going on, that no sane Pope would ever stand by so minimally and do absolutely nothing about. Then comes the "warming of relations" between the Holy See and London, of 1980-ies when Catholics became accepted in British state service albeit to lower posts mainly. This coincided with the beginning of the first non-Italian pontificate in 820 years. In turn, that happened after the last Italian Pope, John Paul I, died just 33 days into his pontificate, of "unknown causes", and was subsequently smeared and labeled with all sorts of alleged corruption scandals by the very same media that nowadays lead the "pedophilia" unholy war against the Church. Furthermore, it is precisely Benedict XVI who, while Cardinal, prepared the field for the pedophilia stunt by in fact protecting child-lover priests amass. And we really see him visiting with Elizabeth II, in the footsteps of his predecessor and even going to London, all after a few renegade (yeah, right) Anglican bishops allegedly "defected" to none other but the – uninspiring Benedict XVI!? (Yeah, right, again). It all stinks a mile as a well known tactics by the freemasonry, and it likely means them high-jacking the majority of the College of Cardinals/Conclave. Sinister as it is (financing both Lenin and Hitler should be too much for any sane person), the Anglo-Saxon Empire can be easily seen as re-using their unholy B-trinity of the Mid Ages today too: bribe them, or blackmail them, or burn them. The now cosmetics-prone Empire (of the self-styled "Empress of 16 kingdoms" Elizabeth II), sure is both able and willing to pull such a feat, especially given the technological advances they reached and nuclear weapons advantage as well (no Catholic nation has nuclear weapons; and France is a freemasonry-mislead nation!).  But the above listed strategic indications of high treachery within the Church are not the only ones. For instance, which sane Pope would watch Croatia and Hungary, the Rome's very last defense-line, sink into Zionist strongholds of Europe, after selling out their very souls, and do nothing about it? Which sane Pope would watch maniacal freaks such as Henry Kissinger rule Europe and her "former" communist cadre through his NED endowment, and do absolutely nothing about it, while instead bestowing honors upon Kissinger’s kiddo Obama? Which sane Pope would tell the Irish to simply put their weapons down, give up their freedom, and turn into money/real-estate-loving creeps instead? Which sane Pope would watch butchering in his own backyard, the former Yugoslavia in particular, and while praying for the victims daily and giving like public addresses weekly, anyway take actions monthly through which he took sides with the MI6-created, Anglophile creatures such as the Croatian HDZ party? Finally, what are the odds that after 820 years of only Italian Popes the Church gets not one, but two non-Italian Popes in a row?

One could go on like this for days, listing the last two Popes’ geostrategic "mistakes" (come on – no one’s that stupid, a top theologian the least of all!). But suffice it to say that this resembles all too close the Trojan horse tactics for conquering nation-states globally also. Thus the main difference between the Pope and the Antipope cannot be viewed separately from that between a patriot and a traitorous politician, respectively: they both talk the talk – at lengths and in-depths, saying all the right words and at the right time, just as one would expect them to. But then, when it comes to walking the walk, they go about doing entirely the opposite from their own words and proclamations... Is it just me, or isn’t it so that the whole situation ends up being quite disgusting, with that gut feeling of you having been betrayed at all levels imaginable? Strangely enough, just like the human body can heal many physical traumas, the human brain too tends to heal psychological traumas as well. So when your brain gets stretched beyond reason, your imagination starts running wild, and secreting that funny liquor of optimism. It all makes you believe in "higher causes", "things beyond our comprehension abilities", "strategic compromises", "politics of reason", and what have you not… But only one thing remains crispy clear as the summer skies are: you are getting played, my Christian friend, and the Church, the Christianity and all them fine soul keepers out there, are in a grave danger altogether as we speak, which is all quite momentous, in fact.

It's definitely an end-time for the return of an Italian Pope, and for the keeps over the next 800 years at the very least. Simply put, traditions are there to remain unbroken. Hey, I know, take the English for example – they’re doing pretty well in the earthly business, and it's all a "mere tradition" - just ask any Anglo kid, as they do teach them in school how to parrot the "tradition" phrase to any foreigner that might have a question about their monarchy! In the meantime, flip over any international law textbook and look up under Sovereignty, monarchical in particular, to learn that monarchies are not traditional but essential holders of all sovereignty in a nation...  And one more thing: beware of a Catholic theologian who tells you that theology teaches one to believe in the Holy Ghost without a wholly body – he’s probably tried the body in all positions imaginable.

Why volcanoes go off (yep, again)

Soon after I published the article of 28 April (Why volcanoes go off -- I mean really), the big brother such as above, was reading it. Usually the "watchers" visit the entries within hours of publishing those, but they're usually pretty well hidden behind bogus IP addresses. I suppose they gather info on how smart they are (or aren't) and I was selected as part of this sample (what an honor-- ha!). Well, what can you say? It's a job like no other, isn't it.  Those who don't know how to hide their IP's, range from prime ministers and CEOs of multinational corporations, to royal courts and supreme courts alike, world-wide.

So the little Icelandic volcano that practically died off at the time I published the above article, has "suddenly" awaken again. The airports are getting shut down all over, and the fear of Mother Nature is creeping into every home world-wide, at the speed of deadly mosquito from Nile, deadly birdies, deadly swine, deadly squirrels carrying plague... While the little rocky guy on Iceland is doing his thing, he is again (yawn!) portrayed by mass-hysteria-media as "spilling the horrible fires from the Earth's dark, dark depths" (say this in real deep voice for the effect)...  Meant for anyone out there who's still willing to buy that crap again and again and...

In any case, that must be the first time in history of geophysics study, I gather, that a volcano from its calming mode switches to the excitation mode, on its own. Anybody cares for a tune?  Something like this might be rather appropriate, me lord:

"As we live a life of ease, Everyone of us has all we need,
Sky of blue and sea of green, In our yellow submarine.
We all live in a Yellow Submarine, Yellow Submarine, Yellow Submarine,
We all live in a Yellow Submarine, Yellow Submarine, Yellow Submarine."

Turkey on a Greece...

...or carrot on a stick, same thing.  Remember that any successful geostrategy rests upon three pillars: military, finance and energy; and that the EU is a top-bottom masonic creation aimed at turning Catholic Europe into something it has never been: an Anglo-Zionist Europe. As such, the EU is a compromise between Catholic and not-so-Catholic Europes. The two Europes exist on top of each other; the latter forcing itself on the former ever since geostrategic partners England and Russia agreed on the final version of death of their patsy Adolf Hitler -- fifteen years after the War.

While Greeks are having fun causing nightmares for the Catholic Europe (oh yes, having the Greek intelligence community, ran by MI6, set up "demonstrations" -- is a fun job!), little is said in the media coverage on why it is that the EU has fallen into this situation -- a classical geostrategic trap actually.  No, I don't mean the economic reasons, for that would require that there actually was a productive economy in Greece to begin with. But when was the last time you read on a produce (canned fish absent): "Made in Greece"? Thus I'm not talking about their 50 years of surviving on USD 10 billion a year -- gratis gift by Uncle Sam simply pumped into Greece annually by Congressional decisions. I'm not talking about luxurious living that Greeks are used to based on those amazing injections, so that they nowadays retire at 62, receive both 13th and 14th salaries and retirements, and so on (it was funny watching a Greek Barbara Streisand look-alike on CNN, "explaining" the unexplainable).  Wow, pretty amazing for a nation which based its economic strategy solely on showing you around (a.k.a. tourism). Does anybody really believe that Greece has either strong will or know-how needed to save 30 billion Euros over 3 years? Yeah, right! All it knows is how to live off of credits. No problem with that, but why not do it on their own, just like many other countries do??

I'm talking about the carrot that the "Freemasonry" has thrown in today (Sunday -- imagine that!) in support of the Greece stick, trying to have the former Europe bite on, and bite on it hard: the Turkey bait. Basically, it spells out like this: if you don't depreciate Euro for up to 35% (i.e. shoot yourselves in the foot), we will bring in the Muslim Turkey into the EU. Ha! Scared yet!? Of course, their original plan has always been to bring in Turkey to Europe sooner or later anyway. London has been attempting precisely this, ever since their bringing of the Ottomans in power, in 1453, and then having the Ottomans march on Rome, in 1463.  The recent anti-military cue in Turkey against HQ Generals who, for the first time in the past century, have actually smartened up and wanted to get rid of the "Freemasonry" in Turkey, speaks volumes. Turkey is now truly a "Freemasonic" puppet, waiting to be string-pulled at Tsaress Elizabeth's will. (Funny to some, but in 500 years from now historians will regard our age in no other way but as the Second Elizabethan Era). And the recent stampede of Turkey's diplomats across Bosnia, with their awakening of the Ottoman sentiment in the region, is yet another indicator that London is dragging their Asian puppy towards Rome again - periodicy of idiocy.  So getting rid of Greece actually means repelling Turkey too, while bowing to the Greek circus means actually opening ways for Turkey to "march on Rome" i.e. enter the EU permanently weakened by the Greek factor as the EU will then desparately seek to "expand to new markets". What a bunch of lying bastards, those "Freemasons", huh! But then we knew that all along, didn't we. It's ridiculous to say "Germany is bailing out Greece" when, in fact, it's German "Freemasons" bailing out Anglo "Freemasons".

There are always infinitely many stupid moves one can make; most of the time there is precisely one smart move. In this case, the smart thing for the EU is to cut off Greece from Euro zone, promptly. In fact, their adoptive mom has cut herself off from the Euro zone hasn't she, and boy is she having fun -- while owning 1/6th of the Planet's landmass!  Don't take me wrong, I'm all for tradition (and Elizabeth the Queen is all about tradition, riiiiiight?). Greece has the longest tradition in whole of Europe as far as money minting goes -- just look at the photo, isn't that great? I think they should be allowed to do what they do best: keep tradition alive!  The only remaining question is when the former (and wiser by definition?) Europe is going to start having this much fun herself, geostrategically speaking and then, by definition, in all other ways as well!

http://www.websocializing.com/

Why volcanoes go off (I mean really)

Just like the Internet and every single Internet success-story are (her) military-related or military-approved, so is every other involvement by (her) military in civil affairs in the best interest of empress Elisabeth v.2.0, too.  NATO is the absolute champion in this, and the absolute champion amongst its programs of interfering with civil society is its geophysics program. It's doing miracles to the tsaress's makeup. Thus NATO officials tear their shoes open by traveling around the world and pretending that they mean good to you and to your people. They tell you that all they want to do is gather enough information to be able to protect you from and mitigate consequences of natural disasters should they occur; such as earthquakes, landslides, forest fires, floods, etc.  What they actually do is collect data that enable them to affect the nature in a manner and to a scope such that your entire environment can be affected by an instantaneous disaster that can be ascribed to nature and not your eternal enemy -- them. What a perfect theater!

I can think of at least three ways to use just one to two torpedoes on a tactical submarine in order to make a volcano go off. And if I can, NATO sure as hell can too, and better (meaning worse). Come to think of it, Iceland is the best studied and understood geophysically active region of the Earth, and it's in the NATO's back yard. Making a minor Iceland's volcano go off a day after Kaczyński's murder by Russian air traffic control, and thus prevent world leaders from attending the funeral of this historic figure that paid the price for his resistance to New World Occupation. Come to think of it, the "fall of communism", being likely the most moronic show ever put on, already exposed London and Moscow as fundamental partners in evil. The latest confirmed news (hardly heard from Anglo-Saxon media) say that the satellite observations from the past two weeks verified no more than 5% increase in atmospheric ash of the amount needed to declare no-fly zone. NATO had motif, knowledge and means to trigger that little volcano, and then blow it's eruption via their media out of proportion. Just like I can think of ways how to stimulate a volcano, I have a pretty good idea on how tectonic plates can be made to move in a wanted direction and, in many cases, to a wanted degree. In short: Yes, earthquakes can be caused easily, using tactical weapons deployed at certain spots so that strain is released (pressure in case of volcanoes).

Now you know why Anglos love studying geophysics round the world round the clock. It's exactly the same kind of "love" for other sciences, say Egyptian hieroglyphs, as they dream of unmasking a "fundamental secret knowledge" which would enable them to expose Catholic Church (yawn, not again...) as a mythological fraud. You know what I'm talking about, the Horus-Jesus equation. Be it cherry-picked as it is, for the purpose of the discussion I'll say this about that parallel: as if a model one uses to achieve the goal matters more than the goal itself! The Church's ultimate goal is to civilize all bastards on Earth, that is to bring about that thing some like to call the Good, no doubt about that. As far as the London's ultimate goal is concerned, there is little room for doubt there too.

http://www.websocializing.com/

Case XYZ: Elisabeth II as Barbarossa, as Sigismund, as...

The past several weeks of concentrated attacks on the very essence of the Church through classical espionage-dug-out-pedophilia cases have demonstrated vividly that we still live in the Mid Ages. It also proves that Elisabeth II is a self-styled empress with the same role and intention as that of Barbarossa or Sigismund - destroy the Church and if you can't at least try to get rid of a Pope while you're in power. To demonstrate something... god knows what. That they can do it?? And then what? 2000 years were more than enough for the Church to learn how to efficiently repel all sorts of London's blind bullets, such as the bogomils, the witches, the Ottomans, Hus, Luther, Grimm brothers, Gutenberg, Lenin, Hitler, Ozzy Osbourne and all of "death metal music"...

How did they pull this one? Well the key issue here is the so called Age of Consent clause in the common law. In the continental Europe, and worldwide, the age of consent has always been around 14 years of age (varying between 12-16, in different cultures and in different historic eras). But what Anglo-Saxons did, was to rise the legal Age of Consent in their own Anglo-Saxon law to 18. They had to do this as they as a tribe have the largest proportion of serial killers and rapists of children, as well as criminals overall (due to lack of new colonies resulting in overbooked prisons, decommissioned ships are now being turned into prisons in Britain), amongst all the tribes throughout history. After they became the dominant culture globally in the past half a century, the rest of the world came to accept most of their societal and legal structure too, mostly through force and treason. So came about the generally perceived notion, fueled by hysterical media firmly controlled by Anglo-Saxon "intelligence" community, that having sex with someone age 12-18 is something which counters nature. If Anglo-Saxons are any measure of our evolution ability, it's quite obvious that the human race has not progressed in any positive direction over the past half a century of their global domination. Quite the contrary, the humans have regressed towards insensitivity and alienation in that period -- in other words a total dehumanization. So why would 18 be acceptable all of the sudden as an evolutional improvement in a species which hasn't evolved in any similar manner for the past hundreds of thousands of years? There is only one answer to that: they won the last World War, and have never stopped misusing the strategic advantage so acquired. Given that they actually financed Hitler and Lenin, it's obvious that the human race owes Anglo-Saxons absolutely nothing. After such a statistically significant (unnatural) jump from around 14 to exactly 18, the clause has lost most of its natural significance, so that its purpose grew blurred (as the border became exact) and all that more prone to misinterpretation. Simply put, the clause has become a powerful strategic weapon on its own. Thus in the Anglo-Saxon culture it has become strange to show any kindness towards kids even your own -- that's how important a weapon the clause has become to Elisabeth II!

How come that Anglo-Saxons never get tired of sponsoring the most bizarre people and ideas around? For instance, what they don't realize in this latest of their attempts, is that by increasing the number of publicized cases relating Catholic priests to pedophilia obviously going farther and farther in the past (not to mention comic-books type of witnesses with their eyes wide open for million-size settlements) they're only proving one thing: pedophilia amongst priests is no more frequent than amongst general population. It thus seems that Anglos are far more stupid than one could imagine. It looks even more stupid when they try to compensate their stupidity with persistence (just look at the Climategate; they're continuing their business as usual -- how much more stupid can you get, really?!) And what do you get by piling bullshit on top bullshit? A stinky pile of bullshit! It's ridiculous, unless of course you enjoy wallowing in it, while thinking that no one can see you.

The only collective guilt by the Church in this case is that it opened itself widely, allowing all sorts of people to become priests. As the lustration in east Europe has revealed, a large number of Catholic priests were actually communist secret service agents and foreign governments' spies -- plain and simple. Now imagine what sorts of MI6/CIA/Mossad scum (speaking of real child molesters) this well-intentioned openness must have had brought to the Church in the huge and immensely hostile realm that the Anglosaxonia is to the Catholicism. The Second Elizabethan Era will be remembered for the English speaking world's Catholic Church having been conquered from within.

Obviously, Anglos themselves are like big kids. But worry you not; no one will rape them, oh nooope! And why not? Well simply because they're the ones with the most dangerous guns around; ever! Much like that satanic kid in a must-see movie Case 39.  But before you check that one out, have a look in the meantime at the Catholic Kids. I would include a link on Anglo Kids, if there only were one...

World leading institute dates Visocica concrete to Roman era

In what seems to be the first credible scientific analysis of the Visoko building material, experts from the Politecnico di Torino - Italy's oldest technical and "one of the best Universities worldwide in its field" - have confirmed that "cement-like material is inert and porous concrete like that in ancient Rome".

So far we only had mumbo-jumbo hearsay coming from Mr. Osmanagich and "freemasons". Now it's official: the "Mu civilization" had nothing to do with Bosnia! Do you hear it, Mr. Hitchner? (Mr. Hitchner is an archaeologist specializing in Roman legions, and a creator of the Dayton Peace Accord meant to knock down the Old World Order of the UN just like the Munich Accord of 1938 had knocked down the League of Nations'; the only time CNN reported every half hour of the Visoko "pyramids" was on the day Bosnian Parliament was about to ratify the results of aggression -- the Czechoslovakia situation of 1938, replayed).

Feels good to learn you have a "psychic ability" of foretelling the outcome of complex chemical analyses years ahead, as I've done here.

--
UPDATE, 01 MAY 2010: shortly after I published the above article, the report on the Turin (Torino) analysis became unavailable on the server. A site search for keyword "Bosnia" returns these remnants of the purged report, "forgetting" to mention that the cement is from the Roman era. Now that's the "Freemasonry" love for truth -- caught red-handed!

http://www.websocializing.com/