Saturday, October 10, 2009
Belfast Phase is an excuse to end Bosnia
at
01:21
0
comments
Friday, October 9, 2009
Dayton Two means Belfast Phase for Bosnia
With the situation amiss, the intelligence underground community composed of Serbian SDB operatives and collaborators from all ethnic groups, led by MI6, has naturally began expanding their theater of ops. So now Catholic churches in Sarajevo are being attacked, and insulting messages painted all over them. The theater was previously softened by an increase in ethnic incidents in the last month or so, where, for example, Croatian flags were set on fire by groups of Sarajevan soccer fans controlled by the SDA party (meaning: Serbian SDB). This all means that, in order to accomplish their geostrategic goal as mentioned above, the op analysts led by the aforementioned freemasons are doing their best to plant the seed of hatred once again amongst Bosnian Muslims and Catholics. There could hardly be a more unnatural conflict on the face of the Earth, than an animosity amongst these two groups because they are the one (Illyrian) people divided by misfortune of historic occupations (by Ottomans; by Habsburgs), always in the interest of English royals and their obsession with how to destabilize the Holy See. This time around, as initiated already a few decades ago, they are aiming to carve up Bosnia into three even funnier (and, obviously, less stable) puppet statelets than is the case presently with the Brussels Phase (Dayton Phase minus Bonn Authorities for enforcing the Dayton Agreement).
In other words, after they had officially recognized the genocidal puppet-creature called "Republika Srpska" as their equal partner (simply by virtue of moving on to the so-called Dayton Two phase, instead of reverting the situation to what was before the Bosnian Genocide established by the International Court of Justice), we are now being pushed by London away from the Dayton Phase, across the Brussels Phase, and on to the "Belfast Phase" for Bosnia. And the English know bloody well how to fire up an Ireland, don't they.
at
02:25
0
comments
Friday, June 26, 2009
Sign Petition for Florence Hartmann
A true heroine of our age, Florence Hartmann deserves your attention and support. This brave lady has stood up against geostrategic powers. She simply acted in compliance with her consciousness, and out of her heart, which happened to be against imperialistic supremacy as well. Learn first-hand why we all still live in the darkness of the 19th century, regardless the glamour and colors of false hopes such as the UN. The strings are being pulled by English royals and their masonic puppeteers. Learn also what sorts of human scum wears judges' robes these days, judges who may be no better than those who once blindly served one chancellor of Germany and his "laws".
at
22:34
0
comments
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Being evil is a family business
Immediately preceding the occupation and obliteration of Kingdom of Bosnia, were two massacres of practically entire Bosnian nobility, first one in Križevci in 1397 and then in Dobor in 1408. The Pope was tricked into giving his blessings to the Hungarian king who committed the massacre, by a faked "coronation" of the Bosnian king for the King of Serbia in 1377 (thus the Pope was made to believe that Bosnia was going to become an Orthodox province). Hungarian king belonged to the Order of the Knights of Dragon, an English geostrategist shield gathering duke of Norfolk de Mowbray, Austrian archduke Ernst, Serbian despot Stefan, Polish king Ladislav, Danish king Christopher etc., a shield that nowadays exists via different forms of "Freemasonry". The real (geostrategic) reason for the massacres however was to soften Bosnia militarily, as practically all generals of the brave Bosnian army and navy were noblemen. Even after such measures, Bosnia didn't give in so easily to the Ottomans, mostly thanks to its rugged terrain and brave people, which prevented any other occupation in prior times (even the mighty Roman Empire took four long years to conquer Bosnia/Illyria proper, in what Roman historians regard as the toughest war that Roman Empire had ever undertaken, on par with the Punic wars).
So soon after the Ottoman annihilation of the country, educated Sephardic families replaced the slain Bosnian aristocracy, took Islam, and were now given the nobility posts and titles, such as Beys and Agas. They have been holding most important posts in Bosnia ever since, making sure that the British geostrategy is being always implemented. This of course is done at the extremely high cost: Bosnia always seems "strange", "unlikely", etc., a nation, with always the most ridiculous political solutions being implemented for Bosnia, while international conferences and foreign occupations shape her destiny geopolitically. These families run government (behind the scenes), but also quite openly run state hospitals, courts, national companies, etc. It's worth noting that, no matter the type of the regime, most of the time members of the same families run the show. Thus the same families, who gave ruling class and intellectuals under the Ottoman occupation, simply continued doing so under the Austrian occupation, as well as under the Serbia's monarchy, as well as in the Communism, as well as today in what mimics Capitalism. At the same time, it's quite obvious to every Bosnian Muslim today that not only our aristocracy wannabes are the least faithful believers of all, but they also care about the national interests the least. Sounds familiar? Of course, the like surrogate-aristocracy is being positioned strategically around the globe, such as, say, the Saudi family. Same goes for the Ottoman family as well; they too were seated using London's gold. Just as they have been seating useful families around the world, the English have been also dethroning families loyal to the Pope. For this they use London's "freemasonry" dogs (a bunch of money grabbing morons) who stage revolutions, invent idiotic regimes such as communism, or play "sudden-billionaire-turned-democrat" roles.
Thus the matter of allowing for some 10000 of his citizens to be massacred in a well planned and organized genocide in Srebrenica, while stopping his own army to rush and rescue them, was easy to one traitor and a Sephard by blood Alija Izetbegović (the suffix "begović" means he's rightfully a "Bey"). Other examples include the Bey Families of Tihić's, Lagumdžija's, Gavrankapetanović's, Filipović's, etc. No matter what, the same families always give the nation's most prominent dignitaries and leaders, managers, judges, media influentials, etc., for full five centuries now. That's how the mechanism of the Britain's geostrategy is being so successfully implemented: by imitating that of the Monarchy herself. It's all a family business, bloodiest one at that... Obviously, the only way to secure stability for Bosnia is to allow her to return to her roots. Ethnically, this means acknowledging that the so-called "Slavic origin" of the Western Balkan's peoples was a fallacy created by England through grants to Vuk Karadžić (proven nowadays by the DNA studies that find the majority of that population to be of Illyrian descent, with virtually no one being of Slavic descent). Politically, this return to the roots means implementing the Spanish solution, and reinstating the last rightful dynasty in Bosnia.
at
16:14
0
comments
Zeitgeist III nails it
at
15:59
0
comments
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Zeitgeist reality check
So we have a world's savior, called the Zeitgeist movement, I hear. No doubt: with the advent of the Internet over the last decade people are becoming convinced that conspiracies are not just theories, but the way human society on Earth is organized. Yet, they seem to be going into another extreme -- while they were underinformed before, they are overinformed now. The result is the same: confusion. (Though, one must congratulate Zeitgeist films creators for not falling in the trap of immediately dismissing anecdotal evidence, or of instead trusting only the idiotic "100% material evidence" trickery, as in the London's so-called "Anglo-Saxon Law system").
The way we live has been predetermined not by some esoteric concepts such as "a grand-scale, never-ending fight between Good and Evil", or by the will of some handful of bankers' families to rule the world (banks don't have armies!). It's far simpler than that. Our world has been shaped by the will of those who have geostrategic potential to rule the world and are using it to that effect precisely! There are only two ways this can go: either by occupying one's mind/soul (via a set of beliefs), or by capturing one's body (militarily or/and via credits). The two absolute geostrategic powers in these two domains are: the Pope and the English Royal family, respectively. While Vatican uses the Good (bless them for that), London misuses the Evil. The most important tool for achieving their goals are their own priests. As we know it through the mouth of its US creator, the "Freemasonry" means merely London's pastors created to follow and pray to Lucifer instead of Jesus... But not in order to "provide a save haven for all who seek protection from the Church prosecution both physical and mental" as masonry likes to say. No! It's a matter of fact, where Bosnia is the key to the ultimate truth, that the reason why the US was created two centuries ago is to serve as a never-ending supply of cannon meat for achieving London's geostrategy that tries to imitate that of the Roman Empire. For instance, this is the strategic reason why Americans are kept undereducated so that their society depends on foreign intellect (60% of US university professors are foreign-born)...
The ultimate geostrategic goal of England is to destroy the (idea of) Pope, which can be done only in his domain. In order to do just that, they will have to destroy Christianity itself. They are doing a great job indeed: from the dragging of the Serb-Slavic hordes from Mt. Ural 1500 years ago to force their way (of like brutality) towards Rome, via the "witchery/sorcery" of the Mid Ages that was successfully crushed by the Church, the splitting of the Church into thousands of denominations, the Italian and later on World (but mostly European) wars including the creation of USA and LN/UN, or Communism and Fascism for which they inverted no less than the Catholic symbolism (of 5-pointed star; of Swastika) so to make it appear the Pope was behind both... The devil truly does come with a thousand faces.
The only way to save the world from the unavoidable destruction of the upcoming (this time surely nuclear) "Reichstag fire - Pearl Harbor - 9/11" intro to (even deadlier) WWIII, is to make the change within the US herself, as well as at the very top of Russia's and China's ruling class so that the "Freemasonry"-type of stupidity is forever eradicated from the face of the Earth. It is on that change, and on sincerity and agility of President Obama and his team that his own physical future depends, as does the future of the United States, and as does the future of our entire World.
at
02:05
0
comments
Saturday, December 27, 2008
EU misled to believe in China
So EU is looking at China (Asia) for help in reforming the world financial system, I hear. EU has started with this wannabe-geostrategy of hers pretty slowly and shy, by first creeping into Beijing some seven years ago and trying ever since to build a geostrategic alliance with China. Well, guess who was there first (by a couple of centuries)? England, of course -- surprise!
The earliest interest by the English (lords) in China started almost a thousand years ago. It culminated in English Navy defeating the Chinese and capturing Hong Kong little over a century ago, to make it a safe haven for the Family Royalle's drug smuggling business (opium; hashish). The "business" turned them into the richest dynasty on Earth, and so encouraged, they later expanded on cocaine markets of Columbia, nowadays safeguarded by MI6 and (parts of) CIA. So China has been a geostrategic puppet of London's ever since. Along the way, Chinese also got their "revolution" just like Germans, French, Italians etc. got their own faked "revolutions" too.
Whenever you find yourself completely overwhelmed by a situation the origins of which you cannot even begin to explain, chances are that you are looking at a grand conspiracy. Such was the case with "fall of Communism" in Russia, where out of 110 armies totaling 5 million soldiers (2nd largest on Earth), not a single hard-line communist general marched on Moscow to capture Parliament or TV, so (not just any but the then-deadliest enemy) Capitalism replaced Communism. Give me a break! Such was the "Communism turned Capitalism" in China too...
Namely, what's been going on in China for the past decade or so is not fundamentally different from what London had contemplated in fmr. Yugoslavia -- a social lab for inventing all sorts of idiotic concepts ranging from genocides to worker-self-governance and back to genocides... Just like the Russian/French/German etc. "revolution" leaders were actually fakes installed by London, so were the Chinese fakes too. The same method is used everywhere: a frustrated individual who would give anything to gain power is opened a huge gold-credit line by London to fulfill his dreams after his masonic predecessor "coincidentally overthrows" the preceding regime. In return, the credit monkey appoints a third individual, carefully picked by London for his heavily disturbed psychology, as the successor of the rabbit-forerunner. Then follow "world" wars, Gulags etc. More is to come, as Putin appointed Medvedev after mason Yeltsin "overthrew" communism, just like Lenin appointed Stalin after masons Kerensky/Lvov "overthrew" monarchy, Hindenburg appointed Hitler after mason Ebert "overthrew" monarchy, Kai-Shek appointed Zedong after mason Yat-sen "overthrew" monarchy, Stambolić appointed Milošević after mason Tito "overthrew" monarchy, and so on... The method is seen so many times, yet it never failed!
So the Chinese excitement with their "sudden" prosperity, followed by national awakening, the Olympics (who said Sarajevo 1984) and even own "Space program", are all sure signs of an upcoming calamity to be brought upon the Chinese by their very leaders -- loyal to London only. What a retarded move on part of the EU leaders (most of whom belong to "Freemasonry" and similar Londoner freaks), to actually declare high hopes in such China!? 'Speak geostrategicsish, anyone?
at
20:57
0
comments
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Missiles, not airplanes hit the Towers on 9/11
YouTube has problem with this video, I hear. They do not allow it on their servers! No, it is not pornography of any type... It is the most staggering piece of evidence yet that the 9/11 was just a (CGI-computer animated graphics) fairytale. What really hit the Towers were air-to-land missiles, the image and trajectory trace of which were digitally re-mastered to look like airliners in the footage broadcast by five national news corporations simultaneously (with an obvious 17-seconds delay). The broadcast was actually controlled from a single (command) center, while military communication was intercepted by early news reports on that morning... No digital equipment was operational on that morning in the Manhattan area (military electronic spoofing) so no amateur digital images exist, while NYPD officers spent that whole day confiscating rolls of film that people turned in to local photographer stores for developing, under the excuse of "protecting memories of families of the victims". Yeah, right: too carrying a police force, a little too soon... Literally all of the so-called amateur video-footage of the "planes" smashing (cartoon-like slicing) into the buildings was "taped" by actual professionals in CGI -- the list of names and their professions is staggering! No eyewitness has ever reported of an airplane, while instead many (suppressed in media reports) did report of missiles, including a news veteran with war experience from Iraq and Afghanistan. The only dozen-or-so "eyewitnesses" who claimed they saw airplanes hitting the buildings were (wow!) top executives of those five national news corporations! That list of names and professions is as staggering... But if you thought this was not enough to prove the mother of all conspiracies: people from the allegedly hijacked airplanes never meant to take those flights (at least one of which never existed as a regular flight), nor has anyone showed up at the destination (LA) airport that day to expectedly ask about their love ones -- no relatives, no friends, no one... Indeed, as we now know with certainty, a missile struck the Pentagon on that day, so the whole operation including NY and PA logically was accomplished in the same manner -- using missiles... What a documentary! What a shameful place Anglo-Saxonia is! And what a dumbass gang the "Freemason" pyramidiots are!
at
02:39
0
comments
Friday, November 28, 2008
Leading US student paper goes fascist?
------------------
Mensur Omerbashich (several attempts to leave the following comment have failed) Never heard of "disappearing peoples", especially those allegedly gone in a mere few centuries? Were they adopted by an alien civilization? Seriously now: more likely, the sources (Roman, Hellenic, later Serbian, Croatian...) started calling Bosnians their own. It's called geopolitics. Happens often, all around the globe, e.g. today in the Middle East where freedom fighters are commonly regarded as terrorists. You catch my drift… Which brings me to an earlier comment by this propaganda’s author: Serbs and Croats became as such around the Renaissance, with other nationalist movements of Europe. So, no Serbs or Croats existed as such in "5th century". Just us, Illyrians, later regarded as Bosnians (after a centrally positioned Illyrian tribe and river) – the people of Kingdom of Bosnia put in place along with many other kingdoms to safeguard the Pope in the collapsed-Rome aftermath, when Slav hordes began unstoppably advancing towards Rome…
Reminder: around 17th/18th century, immediately after England got nearly nailed by powerful Spaniard fleet under the Pope, masonic creeps (London's puppets) spread across Europe to instate capitalism instead of monarchies. England wanted to preemptively get rid of “Papal armies” after her “Deadliest War”, so by manipulating human weaknesses (as today!) England and her Freemoronic Trojan Horse put in power a number of money-grabbing morons called capitalists, across Europe… (By the way, they still run most of Europe.)
The Pope’s noble intention of 17th century was to civilize the Anglo-Saxons, something even Romans never managed to do. Slavs were the only other significant European tribe that Romans never civilized either. These two failures by the Romans/Pope are the cause for all major troubles that Europe has gone through since 17th century at least. Even as we speak, the EU has been sabotaged by London (finances/monetary) and its credit-puppet Moscow (energy)… At the same time they pretend (recall the joke called "Fall of Communism"?) to be grave rivals over Bosnia and thereby afraid of each other, thus justifying the Bosnia’s gridlock, when in fact London supported Serbia in early 1990-ies when Russia was on her knees. So keeping the Pope in his Golden Cage (a.k.a. Vatican) that Italian masonic traitors have placed him in one century ago, is of utmost importance to London. We all know how to make a golden cage golden. It’s the part ‘how you make it a cage' that’s relevant here.
--
Mrtav Hladan Fri Nov 14 2008 04:21 Illyrians don't make me laugh they disappeared and then 3-4 hundred years later Albanians are mentioned.Now all of the Balkans is Illyran.Seems that The Austro-Hugaran propaganda is still in effect.Bosnia is a EU colony and will eventually split between Srbija nad Hrvatska.And the Muslims will get what we leave them.
--
Mensur Omerbashich Thu Nov 13 2008 13:32 To Alexandar: around 2/3 of all Bosnians are Illyrian, according to independent (Western) DNA studies in the last decade or so. Most Croatians, Montenegrens and Albanians are also Illyrian. It also turns out that most Serbians are not even Slav... The Bosnians=Illyrians equation coincides well with ancient maps depicting Greco-Roman period, showing Illyria centered on Bosnia and naming the today's Adriatic Sea (Emperor Hadrian's Sea) as Mare Illyricum - the Illyrian Sea. Professor John Wilkes, a world leading authority on Illyrians, also supports this equation. So, you were saying?
--
Aleksandar Thu Nov 13 2008 11:00 In ten, twenty, or hundred years, sooner or later Bosnia will separate into three pieces and the Croatian and Serbian thirds will unite with Croatia and Serbia respectively. All south slavs (except the Slovenes) are eitehr Serbs or Croats. These are the only two slavic tribes mentioned in in the Balkans since antiquity. Montengrins, Bosnijaks, Macedonians, what were their ancestors called before they moved to the Balkans?
at
19:38
1 comments
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Croatia's bridge on Britain's orders
Construction is Freemasonry's favorite cover-up (another one is visiting local hospitals and posing as a group Santa). To that effect, they even stole the famous Egyptian pyramids story, and are selling it as their own brand. (As I mentioned earlier, they were created only in 17th century, on English Crown's orders, to pose as a Trojan horse in continental Europe, which then extended around the Globe.) In imposing its naughty little game, the British government doesn't care much about what it is that its Horse preaches, or how many histories it makes up (such as: imprinting pyramid images on bank notes, inventing faked hopes like US, UN, etc.). All they want is to impress us, by creating as much and as shiny as possible, in any area imaginable from economy to art to engineering to science, no matter the cost and no matter the value... Most importantly, they use their "obsession" with construction so as to advance their philosophy as that "of those who spread the light", as if students must be lied to about questions we cannot answer, as if buildings must be oversized and stretch ever extendedly and overshadow anything humans make and outshine everything within the surroundings including the nature herself. Because you see, Freemasonry believes that it is them, the chosen few, who are the light, who are the nature, who are the god... And the rest of us? Well, every pyramids story requires slaves, remember? Now you may ask -- why am I telling you all this on a blog about Bosnia?.
A 1919 secret document by the Foreign Office proves UK is aware for a long time of the highest value a Bosnian harbor would have. Britain is trying to prevent Bosnia's access to the International waters, and for this she hired services of her puppet -- the Croatia's government ran by HDZ.
See, the fake pyramids near Visoko aren't the only symbolism that Masonic creeps are trying to impose on Bosnia in order to demonstrate to Vatican that Bosnia will never exit the seventh circle of hell that London had pushed her into, some 1600 years ago, so as to keep the continental Europe permanently unstable and thus Vatican permanently miserable (of course, people tend to grow in numbers, so larger catastrophes are cooked up from time to time, such as fake -- nonetheless bloody -- World Wars, or, before those, Italian Wars, and so on). Thus, as their faked (Visoko) pyramids mass-hysteria as a diversion to the passing of faked Amendments to the faked Bosnia's faked Constitution have all failed in the B&H Parliament (in sweet April of 2006 -- the anniversary of the Bosnia's Grand Masonic Lodge resurrection), new construction was needed, new illusions were to be called for, and new morons were to be drafted into the ranks of fake light. Hence there came about the Pelješac Bridge story...
Now, that's not an ordinary bridge, mind you, for it's supposed to connect Croatia's coastline with Croatia's Pelješac peninsula. The official explanation is that, by building this bridge, Croatia connects Dubrovnik and Croatia's inlands via road, thus entirely abandoning the existing (single-)ferryboat line land-Pelješac. (The Bosnian coastline interrupts that of Croatia!) But there's something really odd about that: to build a bridge is the most expensive solution that the government of an overextended (credit-wise) Croatia has at its disposal! Other, far cheaper solutions include digging an undersea tunnel, or even cheaper yet -- purchasing more ferryboats... But No -- says Croatia's governments, not coincidentally ran by HDZ party -- an MI6 creation (the HDZ infamous counterpart is Bosnia's ruling SDA party -- both created by MI6 to serve England's geostrategic needs). Believe it or not: they're going to build this economic disaster of a bridge -- despite clear and loud opposition from the Bosnian Presidency, and clear and obvious maps by fmr. Yugoslavia Military Cartographic Institute showing the marine delineation [see image above]! And it won't be just any bridge, oh no. It will be built so as to impress, so as to overstretch, so as to overshadow and so as to outshine everything ever seen on both sides of the Adriatic Sea! Not less importantly, in doing so they are going to usurp not less that 1 km of Bosnia's territorial seawaters [see image above]. And that's where our story begins...
And where it ends, too. Namely, as it can be seen from the first, third and fourth image [Bosnia's territorial border shown pink; Top image: Croatia's territorial claim shown red if Bosnian islands of Great Školj and Little Školj (not shown) were to belong to Croatia], this "unexplainable" bridge is going to expel Bosnia from the marine nations club -- by simply crossing Bosnia's territorial waters for about 1 km. It is a well-established practice by the International Court to accept the right of exploitation, and all Croatia has to do in order to grab this little tiny piece of Adriatic Seacoast (to add to 98% it already claims -- without Yugoslavia succession delineation ever carried out!) is to build something... anything, really. The Pelješac bridge thus means: no access for Bosnia to the International waters, and no future for Bosnia's envisioned Neum-Klek harbor, so no bright days for a brave Illyrian nation that have been suffering for the past 2 millennia like no one else has ever suffered on this planet we call Earth. So as a new Constitution is being drafted (as we speak), a new diversion stage has been set up. Bring it on, maestro! When you think about it, all of this just so to provide peaceful dreams for one average nation we call England... Indeed, someplace, someday, may those dreams turn into a nightmare!
at
22:36
0
comments
Thursday, January 24, 2008
To my Albanian compatriot
(A reply to my Illyrian-Albanian compatriot, from the "pyramids" blog)
Dear "anonymous",
Unfortunately, Illyria proper (Dalmatia-to-Albania) is geographically in the way of this ober-strategy by Anglo-Saxon and Slav races. That’s the only reason why the Balkans is in the state of permanent turmoil. Namely, without brave Illyrians (some 20 million strong) enjoying a stable and prosperous state, the pope loses his most faithful guard, and he is thus being permanently disarmed. No wonder why England (a.k.a. never-enough-Great-Britain) is the 4th richest nation on Earth, though itself without any significant (comparatively) natural resources.
Sincerely,
Mensur Omerbashich
at
23:50
0
comments
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Whooo let the Turks in (is letting the Russians in)?
By the beginning of 15th century, the English spies in the eastern parts of the Christendom became aware of the preparations to create the Russian Empire. As a strategic counter-measure, England encouraged and financed the Ottoman (family's) aspirations to the throne of Turkey, hoping to create a shielding counter-empire able of picking fights with Russia, for England. Indeed, after the Great Russian Empire was created (under the auspices of the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1453), that same year the English signaled the Ottomans to march on Constantinople. Indeed, the Ottomans captured with great savagery the capital of the dying Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, thus ending the Roman Empire as well as the Mid Ages...
Immediately after taking over Constantinople (renamed then to Istanbul) and enacting their own Ottoman Empire instead, the now Ottoman Dynasty began returning favors to the English. There was no time to waste, so within a decade the Ottomans had rushed into the Balkans, conquering Bosnia in 1463. While annihilating the Bosnian Church, exterminating the Bosnian royalty, and burning down/leveling to the ground all traces of Bosnia's statehood such as more than 500 castles and churches (yet all 50,000 gravestones called stećci were left to this day as a scarecrow warning of a dead zone - a true No Man's Land!), Ottomans at the same time had left Serbia intact; moreover, Turkey had paid for 99% of all Serbia's churches to be built! Thus Serbia was turned into a reliable ally for future Turkish attacks on the (then entirely Catholic) Europe. A strong geostrategic shield was thus put in place that enabled England sweet dreams for centuries to come, while most of the continental Europe became a never-ending Warfield for geostrategic battles to be fought at, battles that will claim hundreds of millions of lives over the next five centuries...
Just like it brought the Bulgarian schismatic "Bogomilians" to Bosnia in the 11th century to prevent Bosnians from identifying themselves with Catholicism (and from consequently pledging allegiance to Vatican), England used the subsequent Turkish presence in the 16th century for the same purpose (via Islamization). In the same manner as in the previous cases, Austria was brought to Bosnia in 1878, just as Russia is being brought to Bosnia today - as we speak. In order to keep them in check so they never fly off the handle (that is: start thinking they're greater than what's needed for England's needs), England exposes its subdued allies to all sorts of historical burdens. Thus the entire Turkish people "got" the stigma of Armenian Genocide, the Germans "got" the Jewish Holocaust, and now all Serbs "got" the Srebrenica Genocide (limited - as Serbs aren't to be disposed of just yet!) What the English are doing here is using the Roman Empire's strategy of divide and rule very efficiently, where one tribe/people is used against another, however always in a different era and under seemingly contradictory geopolitical circumstances. (The English are careful to impact the mankind's history only for so much, where at least one average lifetime passes between consecutive havocs, so that no one could relate the events or connect them with England).
The famous "majesty" of the England's global dominance stems entirely from the willingness of the English (more precisely: their symbiotic diplomats and financiers) to manipulate the weaknesses of foreign regimes and their key individuals via the infamous unholy B-trinity of the Mid Ages: Blackmail them, or Bribe them, or Burn them. The shiny glamour of the English "culture" holds on to indisputable mountains of starched blood of the innocent. This 4th wealthiest nation in the world - yet itself without (comparatively) any significant natural resources whatsoever - has been using the best of its culprit minds (mostly Lords, then as nowadays, but today also some esteemed university professors) for the past 1600 years, that is, since the English bishops effectively separated from the Vatican. It's exclusively due to their culprit psyche, and not their qualities of any sort, that the English have become so unbelievably rich, so undeservedly powerful, and so unspeakably guilty.
at
20:28
0
comments
Monday, September 24, 2007
Salisbury's secret cycle
The two historical moments that defined today's Bosnia were the occupation by Ottoman Turkey in 1463, and handing Bosnia over to Austria-Hungary in 1878. The latter undoubtedly defined Bosnia's destiny for centuries to come, which culminated in the heavy crisis she's going through as we speak. The current crisis is the consequence of unresolved questions from the 1878 Congress of Berlin. ("...the Congress failed to consider adequately the aspirations of the Balkan peoples and, thereby, laid the foundation for future crises in the Balkans", Britannica, 1999). But how did the change of occupation happen in the first place, and why? Moreover, how do entire countries (European at that!) simply "change hands", and how is this done over night? Of course, one correct answer is: via treason. Another correct answer is: via shameful betrayal of the national interests by domestic aristocracy and intellectuals whose personal gains (financial; career) became their only concern. The third correct answer is (why I'm not surprised) - Britain. Namely, the chief engineer of the monstrous project of replacing one occupationist in Bosnia with another was a British lord (why I'm not surprised, again) Robert Salisbury (1830-1903) [pictured right]. (He also had a train of funny sounding titles characteristic of brainwashed ant-like humans who adore (live for - die for) one person, akin of ants adoring their chief fatty insect). The details from his biography that are relevant for the Bosnia case are that he lost his mom at age 10, that he had such an unfortunate childhood that even his biographers couldn't avoid mentioning it, and that he was bullied big time all the way through his schooling. What a profile of a grow-up-to-become-a-Hitler!
Cartoon that appeared in European newspapers of 1878: German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, to British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, as they play gods discussing the Turkey-Austria switch on Bosnia: "I fancy our friend the Turk don't half like it?" Disraeli, a proud racist, replies: "Ha! That's another "Party" that will have to be "EDUCATED" ".
The unresolved issues from the 1877 Russo-Turkish war had made a new war inevitable just one year later - this time between Russia and England (the Turkey's geostrategic "partner of a thousand years"). Britain became fearful, so British foreign minister Salisbury came up with the following genocidal plan. Since Turkey was getting weak as it was feudal and stretched on three continents, Bosnia was becoming a burden. At the same time, another British geostrategic partner of a thousand years, the industrial but smaller Austria (Austria-Hungary) had become desperate for resources and territory. But most importantly, Russia sought to expend into Bosnia, thus acquiring exit to the strategic mid-Adriatic waters... So, what did Salisbury do? He replaced the Ottoman occupation for the Austrian occupation. For this, he undertook secret diplomacy, and a cover-up "1878 Congress of Berlin" was set up within a week. In it, Austria pretended she was worried about the destiny of Bosnian Christians, and asked if she could occupy Bosnia. As expected, most European states sympathized. So in a single move Turkey has freed 100,000 soldiers and moved them from Bosnia to the Russian front, while Austria became enormously rich at the expense of her new colony Bosnia (minerals; 1st class forest). Austria's gains from Bosnia are estimated at over $100 billion worth today.
Russia realized that situation had changed, and the war preparations against England were called off. Bosnians entirely took Islam in the times English-ally Turkey occupied Bosnia in 1463 - as there were no Slavs in then-Bosnia. In order to make the handover appear unsuspicious to Bosnians, the secret diplomacy culminated with a staged armed resistance that took several thousand Bosnian lives. For his genocidal plan, queen Victoria awarded Salisbury the Order of the Garter, the highest decoration she could bestow. Conservative party was delighted with this man's cruelty , so they elected him the party president in 1885. He served as a British Prime Minister in three terms over 13 years, during which time he maniacally held on to his foreign minister post as well. In his mandate as a PM/foreign affairs minister, Salisbury's psychotic profile of a bullied kid simply exploded, and he personally redrew borders of most of the states in Africa, split up the entire Arabia into dozens of funny-shaped countries (drawing borders to match the oil reserves i.e. the oil companies' interests), reinstated cruelty in the British army - India in particular, occupied Cyprus and South Africa... For his cold-blooded dictatorship and cruelty he was dubbed the "PM with Imperial Ambitions" and "English Napoleon". That it was the case of madness can be seen from the way he raised his children too: his son lord Robert Cranborne (1893-1972) designed the apartheid regime of South African Republic. The other son, lord Edward Gascoyne-Cecil (1867-1917) was a colonial administrator of Egypt, and was known for cruelty and smuggling. Yet another son of Salisbury's, lord Robert Cecil (1864-1958), has founded in 1919 the "League of Nations" - the predecessor of the "United Nations"... Like father like sons, and these grabbing maniacs took a big bite of the cake themselves, so the Salisbury estate today is estimated at around $ 1 billion... Demonstrably, the world as we know it is a creation of a single dynasty of money-grabbing lunatics! (And by dynasty I don't mean just the Salisbury's, since the creation of the two key geostrategic points - the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal - was commissioned before and after Salisbury's terms, respectively, so the British collective never depends on any single person - it rather uses many individuals' relentnessness - relentlessly).
.
In his last interview, that appeared in Sunday Times of March 1980, Josip Broz "Tito" opened his heart and admitted that Yugoslavia was a mere creation set up for Britain's interests. This explains the illogical moves not characteristic of a communist leader, which Tito has taken during his lifelong reign, such as: why he never named his successor, why he (shortly before he died) prepared the country for dissolution by imposing a new Constitution of 1974 that invented federal units ready-made to become independent, and so on. In his death-bad interview, Tito recalled his meeting of 1944 with Winston Churchill in Naples (Napoli), Italy [pictured on the right]. They had agreed Tito would have Yugoslavia the way he wanted, in return for acting as a deterrent or a shield against the Soviet Union (but already in September he met with Stalin in Moscow, so the whole thing was a performance culminating in the Tito's 1948 staged "No!" to Stalin). The 1943 Teheran Conference took place ahead, leveling the ground for this agreement. But in the same week when the Teheran Conference was held, the 2nd Session of the so-called AVNOJ (communist supreme body) took place, pretending to mean an act of independence by Tito's partisans. So even Tito's famous "No!" to Stalin, of 1948, was just a materialization of the secret deal reached a few years earlier between Tito and the British...
When he realized how successful he was in the western Balkans, Salisbury made his idea a permanent one: whenever Russia gets strong - homogenize the Balkans, and whenever Russia gets weak - dissolve the Balkans. Make sure it's all done in secrecy and with bloodshed using unprecedented savagery. In order to see her plan always executed and then brought to the desired outcome, Britain has sponsored the creation of both the Chetniks (Serbian fascists) and the Ustashe (Croatian fascists). As a result, two Yugoslavias were created and dissolved so far. The first, in 1918, in response to the October Revolution of 1917 (that Britain financed herself through Rothschild family's credits to Lenin), resulting in the creation of the Soviet Union (SU). The first Yugoslavia then dissolved in blood as Russia (SU) became weak under Hitler's attacks. (Hitler too was on Rothschilds' credit-stub, which explains why he allowed Chetniks' and Ustashes' presence in Bosnia despite the Nazi propaganda from 1920-ies and on claiming racial non-Slavic purity of Bosnian Illyrians that Nazis saw as being Germans' kin). Second Yugoslavia was then resurrected in 1944, in response to the 1943 victory of the Red Army over Nazi Germany, enabling Russia (SU) to become stronger than ever. This second Yugoslavia was also dissolved in blood, in 1991, after the SU got dissolved in 1989 which had made Russia weakest since 1941.
By instating such a cyclic havoc upon the western Balkans, Britain re-attains a large maneuvering space in the geopolitical arena each time a new cycle of violence erupts. Although many developed nations with good intelligence services know very well what's going on, most nations are actually unaware it's Britain who sets the fire in the first place. Namely, Britain uses such times of crises to reinforce her image in the world as a superior nation able to solve even the gravest atrocities of the mankind. Her strategists are then called upon in many other areas of the world and asked for help and advice (the lord seems to be the Britain's best exporting produce). Imagine how easy it gets for Britain then to impose her own interests/will worldwide, by selling her own interests as - yours. It's a simple game really, no big science involved; in fact, it's made such a shallow game on purpose, precisely so that no one sane would ever believe it to be real. It's also a game that enables Britain to keep Slavic races at bay (see article of 17 September), though this isn't the primary concern of Britain's any more, as she's been a secret geostrategic ally of Russia's without interruption since 1917 at least. This is evident in Bosnian case too, from the fact that Tito himself had prepared the field for Yugoslavia's second collapse, but also from the recent events - because the so-called animosity between Russia and Britain/US today is clearly a faked one as Britain supported Serbia in 1992 too, i.e., when Russia was extremely weak. Therefore it cannot be that Britain/US are now afraid of Serbia when Russia is strong, either. Then the real reason behind the current crisis isn't the Bosnia-for-Kosovo trade, but the other way around: Kosovo-for-Bosnia, as Britain is trying to move the Orthodox frontier westward from the Drina River for the first time since the fall of the Roman Empire. The reasons why Britain is doing this (for which it has committed Genocide provably twice at least) is to create a tighter partnership with Russia for the upcoming actions against China, but also to harm the geostrategic position of her other (beside China) foe - the Vatican - by letting the Orthodox Church into the Vatican's "back yard". Lastly, there is her old goal as well: curb out the potentially only sovereign non-Christian tribe of all Europe - the Illyrians.
at
22:57
1 comments
Monday, September 17, 2007
Bosnia, what's in the shape
World as the playground of three essentially racial axes and one religious axis for the past 1500 years
In the midst of all the gulfs and fronts, at the meeting point of three major geostrategic axes, lies Bosnia (Illyria proper). Three major geostrategic axes that are playing the role in the Balkans for the last 1500 years or so, and that have shaped Bosnia to her present unnatural (triangular) shape, are: the Slavic, the Anglo-Saxon and the Catholic (Vatican) axis. (For instance, constant fighting for power between the latter two is the reason why "Freemasons" - a British Trojan Horse created to manipulate the Third World leaders - are so preoccupied with denouncing Catholicism.) Bosnia is only one of several hotspots of this geostrategic fighting, but situation with Bosnia is particularly difficult in that respect, given her three-corner position along the most important separator. Thus the first two axes use mostly methods of special warfare in order to periodically destroy Bosnia's essence (i.e., its unhampered brotherhood between various faiths and races, as due to the country's crossroads position) and thereby secure their own supremacy over Bosnia. Main methods of special warfare they're using are: 1. cause localized wars by creating, sponsoring and cyclically fueling ethnic extremists such as Chetniks, Ustashe and Mujahadeen with resources and opportunities; 2. bribe local politicians so that they obey the axes entirely, including to commit treason; 3. impose strict media and judiciary control that disable mechanisms of nationalism as the only able enemy of globalism (meaning: globalization hijacked for interests of any of the given axes). It's really remarkable that any human activity, let alone science as the most complex one of all, has remained largely intact, although clear signs of elitism and unscientific control along the geostrategic axes' borders do exist in science as well.
at
22:02
1 comments
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Bosnia-H%z$wa, what's in the name
Imagine a European country in which official history teaches for over a century that "no one knows how the country became" or cannot explain why the country was named the way it was named. In addition, all official discussions of that country's history since the Antiquity and on, carry compulsory labels that say: "very little known about", "not understood", "very little evidence" etc. Well, imagine no more, for that country is Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hmm, Bosnia and what? Oh, you thought I said Bosnia and Southern Bosnia... Because, doesn't "Herzegovina" stand for a southern region of the country, named after Duke (German: Herzog) Stjepan Kosača, a medieval landowner of that region's largest chunk?
at
17:04
2
comments
Monday, September 10, 2007
Britain - complicit to genocide, TWICE!
Exercising her free will and the rights reserved as stated in the earlier proceedings in this case [see below]; Following the 14 years of delays under Britain-instated duress in the Bosnia v. Serbia case; Unsatisfied with the obviously unjust verdict in the Bosnia v. Serbia case by the International Court in Hague presided by an English woman; the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is hereby suing the United Kingdom and other states previously implicated as stated in the above, for GENOCIDE..
15 November, 1993
.
.
Article IX
of the Genocide Convention:
First, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has failed in their affirmative obligation and refused "to prevent" genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of Article I of the Genocide Convention, which provides as follows:"The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in the time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish." Second, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom has illegally imposed and maintained an arms embargo upon the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in violation of U.N. Charter Article 51 while acting in its capacity as a Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council. The United Kingdom has also aided and abetted the ongoing genocide against the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina by actively opposing all of the efforts by other States to "lift" this illegal arms embargo. For these reasons, we will charge that the United Kingdom has violated Article III, paragraph (e) of the Genocide Convention that expressly prohibits "complicity in genocide." The legal basis for this charge has been developed at length by Judge ad hoc Elihu Lauterpacht in his Separate Opinion attached to the World Court's Order of 13 September 1993 in the Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), which is currently pending. Finally, in our Application and Request to the World Court, we will charge that the United Kingdom is both jointly and severally liable for all of the harm that has been inflicted upon the People and State of Bosnia and Herzegovina because the United Kingdom is an aider and abettor to genocide under the Genocide Convention and international criminal law.
.
. We also serve notice upon all of the more than 100 Contracting Parties to the Genocide Convention that each and every one of them has a solemn legal and moral obligation "to prevent" the commission of genocide in and against the People and State of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina as required by Article I.
.
.
.
****
.
.
Professor Francis A. Boyle
Law Building 504
E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, Ill.
61820
3 January 1994
Professor Boyle ("the author") called the Registrar of the International Court of Justice in order to make three basic Points to him for transmission to the Judges of the World Court:
.
1. The Bosnian decision to withdraw the lawsuit against the United Kingdom was made under duress, threats, and coercion perpetrated by the British government and the governments of several other European states upon the highest level officials of the Bosnian government in Geneva, London, and Sarajevo. Therefore the so-called agreement to withdraw the lawsuit against Britain was void ab initio. I reserved the right of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to denounce this agreement at any time and to institute legal proceedings against the United Kingdom in accordance with the Statement of 15 November 1993.
.
2. The British government demanded that the author be fired as the General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the Court. The British government knew full well that the author was the one responsible for the Bosnian strategy at the World Court, and especially for the recommendation to sue Britain.
.
3. Toward the end of conversation with the Registrar on 3 January 1994, the author made an oral Request that the World Court indicate provisional measures proprio motu in order to protect the People and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina from extermination and annihilation by the rump Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia. He pointed out to the Registrar that this oral Request was in accordance with the terms of the written Request for provisional measures proprio motu in advance that was already set forth in Bosnia's Second Request for Provisional Measures of 27 July 1993. The Registrar informed him that the Court was paying close attention to the situation in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Pursuant to Point 2, above, the author was relieved of his responsibilities as General Agent for the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina before the World Court on 12 January 1994.
at
15:55
0
comments
Sunday, September 9, 2007
GEOSTRATEGY, what's in the word
.
Isn't it remarkable indeed that GEOSTRATEGY, a word so important and so frequently cited (Google returns: 100,000) cannot be found in a high-esteemed encyclopedia such as the most famous and most praised one of them all - the Britannica? Things omitted can indeed matter more than things considered. Thus is the case with the Britannica that, to make things even weirder, does report on strategy - from the battlefield to the national level - but stops short of reporting on geostrategy as the "strategy of all strategies". It's with this thought in mind that I write this blog. My goal is to expose those geostrategies that are the culprit behind the millennial suffering of the Bosnian people.

at
23:55
0
comments